PC Components CPUs Athlon Vs. Atom: Duel Of The Energy Savers Features By Bert Toepelt published 15 August 2008 Page 13 of 14: SiSoft Sandra Page 1: AMD Athlon 64 2000+ At 8 Watts Page 2: AMD Athlon 64 vs. Intel Atom Page 3: Chipset Comparison: AMD vs. Intel Page 4: Cooling And Temperature Page 5: System Power Consumption Page 6: Processor Power Consumption Page 7: Web Browsing Speed Page 8: Real World Use: LAN, DVD And HD Speed Page 9: Athlon 64 vs. Atom 230 vs. Celeron 220 Page 10: Test System, Drivers, Benchmarks, Settings Page 11: Lame, iTunes, AVG, Winrar Page 12: Cinema 4D, Fritz, PCMark Page 13: SiSoft Sandra Page 14: Conclusion: Athlon 64 Is More Economical, Faster, And Quieter SiSoft Sandra Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware NewsletterGet Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Current page: SiSoft Sandra Prev Page Cinema 4D, Fritz, PCMark Next Page Conclusion: Athlon 64 Is More Economical, Faster, And Quieter TOPICS athlon Intel Optical Media Intel Core Benchmark Drivers Celeron AMD Bert Toepelt
