The Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure looks impressive and, at least in my view, quite lovely. Sure, it's big and somewhat boxy, but it's great to see a massive card like this actually getting a triple-slot IO bracket. That provides extra support, though there's also an additional support bar for good measure. The 322x131x71 mm dimensions might not be strictly necessary, as we've seen much higher power draws from cards that aren't quite this large, but it does help keep temperatures down. The card isn't as heavy as some other cards we've looked at, though neither is it a featherweight, tipping the scales at 1582g.
Of course, beauty is subjective, but while most of my fellow editors think the card itself looks good, one voted to award Sapphire the ugliest GPU box of 2022 award—and the year's not even half over. Maybe the blazing gold raccoon face or whatever will help attract some sales on retail shelves, assuming it actually sits on a shelf for any reasonable amount of time. Once you've installed the card in your PC, you can stash the box in your closet and never look at it again (unless you want to).
Sapphire provides a healthy amount of RGB lighting on the Nitro+ Pure. On the top of the card, the Sapphire logo and light bar light up and cycle one set of colors, while the three fans comprise a second lighting zone. Of course, as with so many graphics cards, the instant you install the card in a traditional PC case, the fans will face downward and are only useful for ambient lighting. Regardless, if you like the pretty, shiny lights, the Nitro+ should suffice.
Like most other modern graphics cards, the Sapphire RX 6950 XT includes three DisplayPort 1.4 and one HDMI 2.1 outputs. As noted already, the IO bracket is three slots wide, with two of those slots dedicated to letting air flow out of your PC case. However, the perpendicular orientation of the heatsink fins means almost no air will actually do so.
There are three power connectors, a somewhat unusual arrangement of dual 8-pin PEG with a single 6-pin PEG. PCIe spec means the power connectors alone can provide up to 375W of power, with up to another 75W coming from the x16 PCIe slot. That should be more than sufficient, and we measured peak power draw of around 400W in overclocked mode during testing. Sapphire also notes that it uses a dedicated VRAM heatsink to help keep the faster memory running cool.
- MORE: Best Graphics Cards
- MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy
- MORE: All Graphics Content
I'm a bit puzzled with these refreshes... AMD wants just a little bit more money for them with equally little bit of extra performance, but in the case of the 6950XT and 6750XT, they are not replacing the "equivalent" card, so the potential "value" crumbles down horrendously. The 6650XT is a strange bug as it is meant to replace the 6600XT in the stack (or so I've read/seen) which, fair enough, seems like an "equivalent" replacement, maybe marginally better; just maybe. And still, overall, they don't seem like a refresh that had any significance of being launched right at this time.
The only silver lining I can totally see is the 6900XT and 6800XT going down the price stack significantly, maybe even pushing the already great 6800 closer to the 6750XT, making the latter completely pointless! Well, maybe not quite, but I'd say the 6800 is the go-get card in that price range if the prices adjust downward for the 6800. I wonder if this will push nVidia prices down? Historically it hasn't been the case, but maybe there's still a chance. I mention it, because the 3060ti is the sweet spot of this gen IMO, but if the 6800 goes down in price a bit more, its supremacy will be challenged. We all win regardless xD
Anyway, puzzling release to say the least after seeing the performance of the cards.
If you have the option to buy a 3070, 3060ti, 6750XT or a 6800 at around the same price, I'd be willing to say* rational thinkers would take the 6800.
It does not matter how good a product is if you can't buy it.
I will agree with the 6800 is going to become really scarce now, maybe more than before, when it drops further in price if it gets squeezed from above.
All in all, I find it strange you said it's the least sold card form the line up. I would say the 6700XT is the least sold? I've never seen it out of stock xD
RX 6700 XT: $500
RX 6750 XT: $550
RX 6800: $760
RX 6800 XT: $800
RX 6900 XT: $950
RX 6950 XT: $1,100 (but sold out everywhere)
In terms of performance, the RX 6800 is 25-30% faster than the RX 6700 XT, because it has 50% more CUs and 33% more memory and memory bandwidth. Again, if it were in stock at the $580 MSRP, it would be quite compelling, but when the 6800 XT is only $40 more it's the better choice: 5% more money for 15% more performance.
Based on sales on eBay, the RX 6700 XT has been one of AMD's most popular RDNA 2 GPUs. In the past year, nearly 10,000 have been sold on eBay, compared to only 2,250 RX 6800 cards, 3,700 RX 6800 XT cards, and 2,800 RX 6900 XT cards. The 6600 XT is catching up, having sold over 6,300 since launch, but it hasn't gotten there yet. I know eBay isn't the retail market, but that's as good as I can do with the data that's out there.
Alternatively, the Steam Hardware Survey (DirectX 12 API page) shows 0.30% for the RX 6600 XT, 0.25% for the 6700 XT, 0.15% for the 6900 XT and RX 6600, 0.13% for the RX 6800 XT, 0.09% on the 6500 XT, and 0.05% for the RX 6800. So in that case the 6600 XT has surpassed the 6700 XT in total sales to gamers, maybe.
I don't think AMD will totally halt RX 6800 sales, but it has always been a GPU that only exists to take care of yields. If a Navi 21 isn't at least 90% functional on the CUs, and fully functional on the cache and memory controllers, it can't be sold as a 6800 XT. I do wonder if some Navi 21 chips end up as RX 6700 / RX 6750 XT, just because there will inevitably be flaws in the Infinity Cache or memory controllers. But perhaps AMD just doesn't bother with such chips.
As for the Steam Survey. I mentioned this in the news report where the 6900XT finally appeared in it. I've had it for a good while now and I've never seen the Steam Survey pop. Same with my laptop and its 6800M. I've swapped my CPU 3 times now and I've only been survey'd once; before I even got my Vega64 to replace my RX480. All of this to just point out and reinforce the point that the Steam Survey is weird.
Interesting information none the less, so thanks for it.
Well, at least I hope this will help push the price down even more.