Skip to main content

Dual-GPU Battle: Does Frame Pacing In Catalyst 13.8 Turn The Tide?

Test System And Benchmarks

The Radeon HD 7990 was officially launched four months ago. So, it's been tough to find extra cards kicking around. But XFX came through for us with its R7990 Triple Dissipation card.

Like most 7990s, it's based on AMD's reference design with a 950 MHz base core clock that stretches to 1 GHz when the thermal headroom allows. It also comes with 6 GB (3 GB per GPU) of 1500 MHz GDDR5 memory. XFX bundles a CrossFire bridge, an HDMI-to-DVI adapter, and a DVI-to-mini-DisplayPort adapter. Aside from the hardware, you get the requisite warranty, installation, and promotional documents, plus a driver CD. Pop the included "Do not Disturb" sign on your door when you want to spend some quality time with your gaming PC.

More important, the R7990 comes with AMD's Never Settle game bundle voucher, good for: BioShock Infinite, Tomb Raider, Crysis 3, Hitman: Absolution, Sleeping Dogs, Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon, Far Cry 3, and Deus Ex: Human Revolution.

We all know that the Radeon HD 7990 requires a substantial amount of power, so XFX also sent its PRO850W 80 PLUS Bronze-certified power supply. This modular PSU employs a single +12 V rail rated for 70 A. XFX claims that this unit provides 850 W of continuous power (not peak) at 50 degrees Celsius (notably higher than the inside of most enclosures).

We've almost exclusively eliminated mechanical disks in the lab, preferring solid-state storage for eliminating I/O-related bottlenecks. Samsung sent all of our labs 256 GB 840 Pros, so we standardize on these exceptional SSDs.

As far as testing goes, we're using FCAT to report frame rates, removing dropped and runt frames from the equation.

We're including side-by-side comparisons from the lossless videos used to create our FCAT-based frame rate and frame time variance data. The results are encoded at half-speed. So, at the YouTube "normal" speed setting (30 FPS), you can scrutinize the result at slower-than-real-time and get a great sense of the differences. Then, if you want to see the output as it appears when we're testing, set the speed to 2x (60 FPS).

The 2x speed option can be accessed via YouTube's HTML5 trial. Enable this feature by going here and clicking the "Join HTML5 Trial" button. Once you're in, close and relaunch your Web browser. You should now have access to HTML5-based speed controls through the settings button on the bottom-right of the video playback window:

A few suggestions about the HTML5 trial. Make sure that the video loads completely before playing it back at 2x. The sped-up content requires more bandwidth, and you don't want hiccups in the stream affecting your perception of the capture. Also, we've seen cases where YouTube doesn't register a speed setting change until the page is reloaded. We recommend watching the video at normal speed before doubling it up. It's much easier to see differences in frame rate smoothness this way. Finally, the YouTube HTML5 trial may demonstrate choppy performance in Firefox, but the experience in IE seems much smoother.

Last but not least, we want to send some props to Chris at Memory Express in Winnipeg, Manitoba for helping us sort out an issue with our display hardware. This isn't the first time these folks have come through for us with some last-minute assistance, so thanks guys!

Test System
CPUIntel Core i5-2550K (Sandy Bridge), Overclocked to 4.2 GHz @ 1.3 V
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX, LGA 1155, Chipset: Intel Z77M
NetworkingOn-Board Gigabit LAN controller
MemoryAMD Gamer Series Memory, 2 x 4 GB, 1866 MT/s, CL 9-9-9-24-1T
GraphicsXFX R7990950 MHz GPU, 6 GB GDDR5 at 1500 MHz (6000 MT/s)Nvidia GeForce GTX 690915 MHz GPU, 4 GB GDDR5 at 1502 MHz (6008 MT/s)
Hard DriveSamsung 840 Pro, 256 GB SSD, SATA 6Gb/s
PowerXFX PRO850W, ATX12V, EPS12V
Software and Drivers
Operating SystemMicrosoft Windows 8 Pro x64
DirectXDirectX 11
Graphics DriversAMD Catalyst 13.6 Beta 2, AMD Catalyst 13.8 Beta, Nvidia GeForce 326.80 Beta
Benchmark Configuration
3D Games
Metro: Last LightVersion 1.0.0.10, DirectX 11, Custom THG Benchmark, FCAT
Crysis 3Version 1.6.89.06, Version 1.5.26.05, FCAT
Tomb RaiderVersion 1.1.748.0, Custom THG Benchmark, 45-Sec. FCAT
Grid 2Version 1.2, Direct X 11, Built-in Benchmark, 60-Sec. FCAT
BioShock InfiniteVersion 1.0.1497522, Built-in Benchmark, FCAT
Battlefield 3Version 1.6.0.0, Custom THG Benchmark, FCAT
Far Cry 3Version 1.0.5, Custom THG Benchmark, 60-Sec. FCAT
  • jimmysmitty
    The drivers do seem to make the FPS much smoother overall. BF3 is a good example with the game dropping then jumping and so on but 13.8 made it a much smoother line.

    Its good to see that work is being done to make it more competitive but I fear that its almost pointless since Hawaii XT is on its way and will be a better option in CFX.

    Also Laras hair on the GTX690 was funny. Just fluttering around like crazy. I guess TressFX does make a difference after all.
    Reply
  • jase240
    This is great, AMD is finally getting on par for dual GPU config with Nvidia!!
    This might make 2 AMD cards a way better value than Nvidia!!
    Reply
  • slicedtoad
    awesome, I'm glad they got around to addressing that indiscrepancy.
    Reply
  • viewgamer
    The Metro Last Light benchmark is a modern example of the way Nvidia handles its business.
    These strong arm tactics to eliminate the competition aren't beneficial to anyone, Nvidia's less than pleasant business practices is why I try to support AMD whenever possible.
    Reply
  • viewgamer
    The Metro Last Light benchmark is a modern example of the way Nvidia handles its business.
    These strong arm tactics to eliminate the competition aren't beneficial to anyone, Nvidia's less than pleasant business practices is why I try to support AMD whenever possible.
    Reply
  • Emma Long
    Apart from Metro the 7990 tied the 690 on two occasions and beat it in the rest, that's very encouraging from the red team.
    The situation with Metro last light seems peculiar to me, we've seen things like this before with Nvidia sponsored titles & I thought the industry was passed this sort of thing.
    Nvidia can compete, it has proven so time and time again, which makes this all the more reprehensible.
    I would like to see an Nvidia that competes on the basis of performance & features not strong-arming developers.

    Back to the 7990, so overall it's faster than the 690 and significantly less expensive, at $700 the 7990 puts very serious pressure on the 780 so I'd like to see the 780 added into the benchmarking mix as well.
    Reply
  • CarlitoBanderas
    What's the point of a 690 ? in 1080o & 1440p it's slower than the 7990, in 4K & multi monitor it doesn't have enough memory & it's 300 bucks more expensive.
    Nvidia needs to bring out a 790 asap, the 690 is not competitive anymore.
    Reply
  • m32
    I've enjoyed this article, Toms. We've seen the flaws and now some improvements with the 7990.
    Reply
  • _zxzxzx_
    AMD deserves a pat on the back for working hard on improving their drivers
    Reply
  • aggroboy
    11476339 said:
    What's the point of a 690 ? in 1080o & 1440p it's slower than the 7990, in 4K & multi monitor it doesn't have enough memory & it's 300 bucks more expensive.
    Nvidia needs to bring out a 790 asap, the 690 is not competitive anymore.
    Enthusiast mindshare is still dominated by the GTX Titan, so Nvidia can afford to stand pat.
    Reply