Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4-3200 4x 8GB Review: Lights & Action

Editor's Choice

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Superb performance and moderate pricing earns the Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4-3200 our Editor's Choice Award for RGB-equipped memory, though its pastel colors might be off-putting to a few builders.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Excellent performance at rated (XMP) settings and across multiple data rates

  • +

    Supports both Corsair and third-party RGB utilities

  • +

    Reasonably priced

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Didn’t reach DDR4-4000

  • -

    White light diffusers cast pastel hues

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Builders who put a premium on aesthetics often face a tough choice between the best-looking and best-performance parts. Corsair brings a bit of both in its Vengeance RGB DDR4-3200 kit, providing four 8GB DIMMs (32GB total) at CAS 16 timings for a price that’s reasonably moderate given recent market trends. And this kit isn't all about looks; it has the goods where benchmarks are concerned, too.

First, some memory basics background is in order. Latency is measured in cycles, and latency time is the inverse of frequency. Lower is better when it comes to latency. So for instance, DDR4-3200 CAS 15 would be better (fewer wait cycles) than CAS 16 at DDR4-3200, which happens to be our performance baseline, as well as the spec of this particular kit. DDR4-3200 CAS 17 would be worse (more wait cycles) than our baseline. In other words, Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4-3200 buyers get the extra bandwidth of its high data rate without suffering any additional lag.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
  • irish_adam
    Can we start doing reviews with both Intel and AMD hardware now please? Ryzen is a lot more susceptible to frequency than Intel and as this is an enthusiast website and as AMD is getting 50% of enthusiast sales and has been for a year then maybe its time you started to accommodate all those people that this article is effectively useless for. I feel like the dominance of Intel has made review sites lazy.
    Reply
  • slyverine
    maybe it's because AMD things don't get shipped to them for testing.
    Reply
  • krzysztof.hukalowicz
    From where do you get this 50%?
    Reply
  • Crashman
    21227294 said:
    maybe it's because AMD things don't get shipped to them for testing.
    I haven't received any hardware from AMD, but I could have bought some by now. Until recently the problem was that I only had time to test on one platform and Intel clocked memory much higher. That's still mostly true, but AMD's gaining market share is also true. So now I have a problem, to take twice as long on memory reviews or cut the number of settings to like...two...and do two platforms.
    Reply
  • modobiker
    Great article!!
    Reply
  • rigobertochacon04
    Son compatibles al 100% con software de Msi??
    Reply
  • Crashman
    21346269 said:
    Son compatibles al 100% con software de Msi??
    It functioned normally with our version of MSI software. I don't know if that applies to all motherboard models.

    Reply