Comparison of Graphics Chips and Introduction of the Test Configuration
The Geforce 6 and 7 are not overclocked. If the Geforce 8800 GTS 512 OC was to be operated at the standard clocking rate, it would be as fast as the Geforce 8800 GT OC in terms of overall performance. The Geforce 9600 GT has 1024 MB of graphics memory, while the new Geforce 9800 GTX is competing for first place with the Geforce 8800 GTS 512. Which of these two models comes out on top depends on the clocking rate used—the two cards are too similar in terms of the technical specifications and clocking rates with G92 graphics chip, for any relevant performance differences to be identified.
|Card manufacturer and chip
|Memory Data Rate
|Geforce 9800 GTX
|512 MB GDDR3
|4.0, 1688 MHz
|Geforce 9600 GT OC
|1024 MB GDDR3
|4.0, 1680 MHz
|Geforce 8800 GTS OC
|512 MB GDDR3
|4.0, 1825 MHz
|Geforce 8800 GT OC
|512 MB GDDR3
|4.0, 1650 MHz
|Geforce 7950 GT
|512 MB GDDR3
|Geforce 6800 GT
|256 MB GDDR3
OC = overclocked (speed is higher than standard)
Memory Data Rate = physical clock rate times two
|Intel E2160@1.8, E2160@2.41,E6750@2.67,Q6600@2.4, Q6600@3.2,X6800EE@2.94
|Zalman 9700 LED
|Asus P5E3 Deluxe, PCIe 2.0 2x16, ICH9R
|2x1 GByte, Ballistix (Crucial Technology) 1.5 Volt,DDR3 1066 7-7-7-20 (2x533 MHz)
|Intel High Definition Audio
|Intel 1000 Pro
|Western Digital WD5000AAKS 500 GByte, S-ATA, Cache 16 MB,Hitachi 120 GByte, S-ATA, Cache 8 MB
|CoolerMaster RS-850-EMBA 850 Watt
|Nvidia Forceware 174.53, 9800 GTX 174.74
|Windows Vista Enterprise
|Chip set driver
|X38 Intel 126.96.36.1999
For the purpose of testing, all graphics cards used a version of the new 174 driver introduced with the 9600 GT. The Geforce 9800 GTX required Version 174.74 because the graphics chip was not included in official releases. The Microsoft Flight X SP2 and DX10 preview modes still have representation errors in the water pixel shader—as a result, the simulated waves are missing. In DX9 mode (Geforce 6 and 7) everything appears to be fine.
Current page: Comparison of Graphics Chips and Introduction of the Test ConfigurationPrev Page Test Subjects: Four Generations of Nvidia Chips Next Page Graphics Cards have More Potential
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
will there be a AMD/ATI roundup???Reply
That would simply consume more time without really proving much. I think sticking with a single manufacturer is fine, because you see the generation differences of cards and the performance gains compared to geting a new processor. You will see the same thing with ATI cards. Pop in an X800 and watch it crumble in the wake of a HD3870. There is no need to inlude ATI cards for the sake of this article.Reply
This has been a long needed article IMO. Now we can post links instead of coming up with simple explanations :DReply
I didn't realize the new gpus were actually that powerful. According to Toms charts, there is no gpu that can give me double the performance over my x1950 pro. But here, the 9600gt was getting 3 times the frames as the 7950gt(which is better than mine) on Call of Duty 4.Reply
Maybe there's something wrong with the charts. I don't know. But this makes me even more excited for when I upgrade in the near future.
This article is biased from the beginning by using a reference graphics card from 2004 (6800GT) to a reference CPU from 2007 (E2140).Reply
Go back and use a Pentium 4 Prescott (2004) and then the basis of these percentage values on page 3 will actually mean something.
yadgeI didn't realize the new gpus were actually that powerful. According to Toms charts, there is no gpu that can give me double the performance over my x1950 pro. But here, the 9600gt was getting 3 times the frames as the 7950gt(which is better than mine) on Call of Duty 4. Maybe there's something wrong with the charts. I don't know. But this makes me even more excited for when I upgrade in the near future.I upgraded my X1950 pro to a 9600GT. It was a fantastic upgrade.Reply
scyThis article is biased from the beginning by using a reference graphics card from 2004 (6800GT) to a reference CPU from 2007 (E2140).Reply
maybe it is. but its relevant especially with those people who are stuck with those prescotts/6800gt. this article reveals an upgrade path nonetheless
If they had used P4s there would be o many variables in this article that there would be no direction and that would make it pointless.Reply
Great article!!! It clears up many things. It finally shows proof that the best upgrade a gamer can make is a newer card. About the P4's, just take the clock rate and cut it in half, then compare (ok add 10%) hehehReply
I know randomizer thinks we would get the same results, but would it be possible to see just a small article showing if the same result is true for AMD processors and ATi graphics.Reply
Firstly we know that ATi and nVidia graphics doesn't calculate graphics in the same way, who knows perhaps an ATi card requiers more or less processorpower to work at full load, and if you look at Can you run it? for Crysis(only one I recall using) you will see the minimum needed AMD processor is slover than the minimum needed Core2, even in processor speed.
So any chance of a small, or full scale, article throwing some ATi and AMD power into the mix?