Samsung 990 Pro 4TB Review: The Best Gets Bigger

Samsung bulks up its fastest SSD.

Samsung 990 Pro (4TB)
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Comparison Products

Shane Downing
Contributing Writer

Shane Downing is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering consumer storage, PC hardware, and AI.

  • jaquith
    Admin said:
    Samsung 990 Pro 4TB Review: The Best Gets Bigger : Read more
    Nice review but the "Con" of high MSRP retail prices is a little misleading. The Samsung 990 Pro 1TB is listed on Newegg for $69.99, the 2TB is listed for $134.99 and the 4TB isn't in stock yet anywhere. I would imagine the 4TB costing somewhere less than twice the 2TB. The real world difference between Gen 4 and Gen 5 is negligible and the Gen 4 are considerably cooler to run. Until engineers resolve the higher temperatures problem, I think the Gen 4 is a much better deal.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    jaquith said:
    Nice review but the "Con" of high MSRP retail prices is a little misleading. The Samsung 990 Pro 1TB is listed on Newegg for $69.99, the 2TB is listed for $134.99 and the 4TB isn't in stock yet anywhere. I would imagine the 4TB costing somewhere less than twice the 2TB. The real world difference between Gen 4 and Gen 5 is negligible and the Gen 4 are considerably cooler to run. Until engineers resolve the higher temperatures problem, I think the Gen 4 is a much better deal.
    It's not a con of "High MSRP retail prices," it's a con of "High MSRP." Also, what you said implies "High manufacturer suggested retail price retail prices," which obviously makes no sense. As the article states:

    "Launch pricing is $344.99 and $354.99 for the bare and heatsinked models, respectively. This drive carries a significant premium, but it’s worth $10 more for the heatsink, and further, we expect retail sale prices to be well below these values, as we've seen with other 990 Pro models." (Emphasis added.)

    In short, we don't know yet where the 4TB model will eventually settle, but we do know that the stated launch price feels very high compared to what's already available. Samsung has had some great Black Friday SSD sales in the past, and I wouldn't be surprised to see sub-$300 pricing around BF this year. But we'll just have to wait and see how things develop over time with actual retail prices, rather than the official manufacturer suggested retail price.
    Reply
  • NuSHrike
    Following from the previous https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/samsung-990-pro-ssd-review and this article, this latest 990 Pro is still not King for my needs.

    I need sustained writes and 990 Pros, and Samsungs in general, still fail at it. I'm talking in Windows, Explorer (where I rarely to never see 2GB/s write speeds), and other multimedia in general.

    IOMeter sustained writes, 990 Pro 4TB collapses at 75s in while others like the Rocket 4 Plus-G 4TB keeps going until 120?s in, but then drops to a still higher steady state than the 990Pro 4TB. 990Pro is like a rabbit in a rabbit/turtle race -- early speeds, but no stamina.

    Crystal Disk Mark:
    * random writes, bottom of the pack
    * random IOPS writes only middle of the pack vs Rocket 4 Plus-G, FireCuda, A440 Pro
    * slowest write latency (though talking about microseconds)
    * middle of the pack in peak sequential writes (QD1)
    * finally but only #2 in peak sequential write (QD8)

    I think about these things when I'm making multi-GB copy of Unity files from one place to another.

    Peak reads don't really matter as they're all the same on average in real-world usage where usual numbers never reach above 1GB/s, and well within the performance of all PCIe4 SSDs.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    NuSHrike said:
    Following from the previous https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/samsung-990-pro-ssd-review and this article, this latest 990 Pro is still not King for my needs.

    I need sustained writes and 990 Pros still fail at it. I'm talking in Windows, Explorer (where I rarely to never see 2GB/s write speeds), and other multimedia in general.

    IOMeter sustained writes, 990 Pro 4TB collapses at 75s in while others like the Rocket 4 Plus-G 4TB keeps going until 120?s in, but then drops to a still higher steady state than the 990Pro 4TB. 990Pro is like a rabbit in a rabbit/turtle race -- early speeds, but no stamina.

    Crystal Disk Mark:
    * random writes, bottom of the pack
    * random IOPS writes only middle of the pack vs Rocket 4 Plus-G, FireCuda, A440 Pro
    * slowest write latency (though talking about microseconds)
    * middle of the pack in peak sequential writes (QD1)
    * finally but only #2 in peak sequential write (QD8)

    I think about these things when I'm making multi-GB copy of Unity files from one place to another.

    Peak reads don't really matter as they're all the same on average in real-world usage where usual numbers never reach above 1GB/s, and well within the performance of all PCIe4 SSDs.
    Having used the Sabrent Rocket Plus-G 4TB for almost a year now... I'm ready to ditch it. Something has gotten screwy. The drive is only ~50% full, and read speeds have completely collapsed. I'm talking less than 100 MB/s! It's terrible.

    I can temporarily get things better by making a copy of a folder (like Borderlands 3). But after a few weeks or so (not sure on the time), read speeds on those files become crap again. I'm going to try imaging the 4TB drive to a different 4TB SSD to see if that fixes things, and run that way for a while.

    I don't know for sure what the problem is, so maybe it's Sabrent, maybe something else in my test PC, maybe Windows... so many possibilities! Anyway, I'm just saying that it's tough to know — really know — if any SSD will be great long-term. Also super frustrating. Like, stuff that only happens after several months would never show up in a review. Sigh.

    As for the 990 Pro 4TB, we're also testing hardware BitLocker encryption. If you have Windows 11 Pro and a drive with OPAL support, it will still default to software. You have to jump through a bunch of hoops. Probably a lot of people are running Windows 11 Pro with software encryption and they don't even realize it!
    Reply
  • NuSHrike
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    Having used the Sabrent Rocket Plus-G 4TB for almost a year now... I'm ready to ditch it. Something has gotten screwy. The drive is only ~50% full, and read speeds have completely collapsed. I'm talking less than 100 MB/s! It's terrible.

    I can temporarily get things better by making a copy of a folder (like Borderlands 3). But after a few weeks or so (not sure on the time), read speeds on those files become crap again. I'm going to try imaging the 4TB drive to a different 4TB SSD to see if that fixes things, and run that way for a while.

    As for the 990 Pro 4TB, we're also testing hardware BitLocker encryption. If you have Windows 11 Pro and a drive with OPAL support, it will still default to software. You have to jump through a bunch of hoops. Probably a lot of people are running Windows 11 Pro with software encryption and they don't even realize it!
    Only a year means it falls under warranty? Thanks for the heads-up on longevity.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    NuSHrike said:
    Only a year means it falls under warranty? Thanks for the heads-up on longevity.
    Not a question of warranty. I was sent the sample for use in our GPU test PC. Thankfully, I have some alternatives available. If I image to the Lexar NM790 and the problem goes away (and stays gone!), that will be sufficient for my purposes. If it sticks around, then it's a problem with my PC somewhere (or Windows) and I get the fun job of cleaning out all the files and re-imaging the drive. Right now, I just have a bit of a sour taste now thanks to what happened with the Sabrent Plus-G 4TB. Probably need to ping them and see if they have any thoughts on what's going on.
    Reply
  • Greg7579
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    It's not a con of "High MSRP retail prices," it's a con of "High MSRP." Also, what you said implies "High manufacturer suggested retail price retail prices," which obviously makes no sense. As the article states:

    "Launch pricing is $344.99 and $354.99 for the bare and heatsinked models, respectively. This drive carries a significant premium, but it’s worth $10 more for the heatsink, and further, we expect retail sale prices to be well below these values, as we've seen with other 990 Pro models." (Emphasis added.)

    In short, we don't know yet where the 4TB model will eventually settle, but we do know that the stated launch price feels very high compared to what's already available. Samsung has had some great Black Friday SSD sales in the past, and I wouldn't be surprised to see sub-$300 pricing around BF this year. But we'll just have to wait and see how things develop over time with actual retail prices, rather than the official manufacturer suggested retail price.
    Jarred, I want 8TB M.2 PCIe Gen 4 for my single main data drive. There are 2 or 3 of those at 900 bucks but I want more of them competing out there. Why is 4TB the common ceiling? I want to fit all my image files on one drive. No array. Then I can back up the M.3 PCIe 4 drive to single Samsung SATA QVO 8TB drives that have dropped from 900 to 300 bucks in the last 2 years.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Greg7579 said:
    Jarred, I want 8TB M.2 PCIe Gen 4 for my single main data drive. There are 2 or 3 of those at 900 bucks but I want more of them competing out there. Why is 4TB the common ceiling? I want to fit all my image files on one drive. No array. Then I can back up the M.3 PCIe 4 drive to single Samsung SATA QVO 8TB drives that have dropped from 900 to 300 bucks in the last 2 years.
    It was previously a question of NAND density. To get to 8TB basically required QLC NAND and four NAND packages. Alternatively, 4TB TLC with four NAND packages was possible. I'm not sure of the absolute maximum, but that's basically where we ended. (If you can only do 4TB with TLC, then QLC would only get you 5.3TB with QLC... or alternatively, 8TB with QLC means you should be able to do 6TB with TLC.)

    The good news is that Samsung's latest NAND, used here on the 4TB 990 Pro, should allow a dual-sided configuration to hit 8TB while still being TLC. Whether that will happen any time soon is a different question. But other drives are also 4TB and single-sided, and now there are 8TB dual-sided (still not sure on TLC or QLC, though — I'd have to double check... and I did, and there are TLC 8TB now thanks to BiCS5, possibly some other NAND types as well).

    I think in general the feeling among SSD manufacturers is that 8TB for a consumer drive is still very niche, and so it's not being pursued. Probably going to take a few years for 8TB to come down to reasonable pricing levels. Cheapest for now is the Teamgroup MP44 at $800. Probably in two years (maybe less) we'll see that below $400, and fast 4TB drives below $200.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    Probably a lot of people are running Windows 11 Pro with software encryption and they don't even realize it!
    I didn't know until Macrium informed me.

    MS Surfaec 3 Go came with Windows S.
    Promote that to WIn 11 Home, and the BitLocker remains.

    I didn't know it was BL until the first time I did a full drive Image in Macrium.

    "This Image is of a BitLocker encrypted Volume, but this Image is unencrypted." (or words to that effect)

    wait, WHAT?
    Reply
  • farhadd
    Jarred, do you think we'll ever see Tom's Hardware reviewing Fanxiang drives? I know they might not be top end hardware but their price and performance promises are extremely tempting for a gaming storage drive etc.
    Reply