Intel installs industry's first commercial High-NA EUV lithography tool — ASML Twinscan EXE:5200B sets the stage for 14A

ASML
(Image credit: ASML)

Intel announced that it had installed ASML's Twinscan EXE:5200B, the industry's first High-NA lithography tool with 0.55 numerical aperture projection optics made for commercial chip production. The tool has passed acceptance testing and will be used for development of Intel's 14A fabrication process, which will be the world's first node to rely on High-NA EUV scanners for its most critical layers. The achievement indicates that High-NA EUV lithography is moving beyond early experimentation toward high-volume manufacturing (HVM).

ASML's Twinscan EXE:5200B builds on the 1st Generation EXE:5000 platform that Intel received in 2023 for its Oregon R&D fab. The new tool can 'print' chips with an 8nm resolution, enabling scaling beyond which is currently possible with Low-NA EUV tools that offer a 13nm resolution without using multi-patterning. Unlike the EXE:5000, the EXE:5200B is capable of processing 175 wafers per hour at a 50 mJ/cm² dose (up from 185 wafers per hour at at a 20 mJ/cm² dose) and achieves overlay accuracy of 0.7 nanometers, a critical parameter as feature dimensions continue to shrink.

ASML

(Image credit: ASML)

To boost performance, the scanner integrates a higher-power EUV light source to enable faster wafer exposures at a 50 mJ/cm² dose. This in turn supports workable resist/process windows with strong image contrast while minimizing line-edge roughness (LER) and line-width roughness (LWR), which tend to be challenging with modern production nodes.

ASML and Intel did not limit their work to the optics and light source. They also reworked the wafer stocker system, which is responsible for how wafers are stored, queued, and moved in and out of the scanner. For next-generation tools, this component of the system has a direct impact on both productivity and patterning accuracy.

ASML

(Image credit: ASML)

The updated stocker design improves lot flow and wafer handling to make sure that wafers arrive at the exposure stage in a more predictable state. At the same time, it provides tighter thermal control, keeping wafers and carriers at stable temperatures before and after exposure, an important factor as even tiny temperature variations can cause wafer expansion or contraction, leading to overlay errors, which in turn leads to an increase in defects and decrease of yields.

In addition, by reducing thermal and mechanical variation, the new architecture helps to minimize drift over long runs, thus enabling the scanner to maintain stable behavior and reducing the necessity for frequent recalibration. This stability will be particularly important for multi-pass and multi-exposure patterning, which will be inevitably used in the coming years for sub-1nm process technologies.

One of EXE:5200B's parameters that is hard to overestimate is its overlay performance of 0.7 nm, which was achieved by advancements of stage control, sensor calibration, and environmental isolation. Overlay performance is crucially important for next-generation process technologies as even tiny alignment errors can translate into yield losses.

ASML

(Image credit: ASML)

It is necessary to note that ASML's Twinscan EXE:5200B is not just another EUV scanner in Intel's fab, but rather a foundation that is expected to enable Intel to regain its leadership in the semiconductor industry.

To use the new lithography tool, Intel is conducting parallel work on masks, etch processes, resolution enhancement techniques, and metrology that must be co-optimized to extract the maximum value from High-NA EUV patterning.

Intel says that its High-NA tools will enable more flexible design rules, reduce the number of patterning steps, lower mask counts, shorter cycle time, and increased yields thanks to lack of multipatterning with 14A and more advanced process technologies. Meanwhile, as Intel learns how to use High-NA EUV tools and gains valuable HVM experience, it will be able to insert High-NA EUV multi-patterning when it needs to in the sub-1nm era without significant effect on yields.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Tanakoi
    Unlike the EXE:5000, the EXE:5200B is capable of processing 175 wafers per hour at a 50 mJ/cm² dose (up from 185 wafers per hour at at a 20 mJ/cm² dose)...
    How is 175 wafers/hr "up from" the earlier model's 185 wafers/hr?

    THG editor to Aisle 1, stat!
    Reply
  • Gururu
    How can they be doing this so fast when 18A isn't even up yet?
    Reply
  • George³
    Gururu said:
    How can they be doing this so fast when 18A isn't even up yet?
    But it is. Just production isn't so massive.
    Reply
  • moreslawplease
    Tanakoi said:
    How is 175 wafers/hr "up from" the earlier model's 185 wafers/hr?

    THG editor to Aisle 1, stat!
    If you read Intel's post, it mentions "faster wafer exposure at practical dosages." Doesn't look like ASML shared WPH of the 5000 tool at the higher dose, but you could guess that the dose of 20 is less 'practical.' WFH at 50 on the 5000 would be a lot less than 185, so I guess that's why increasing to 175 on the 5200B is something to brag about.
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    Tanakoi said:
    How is 175 wafers/hr "up from" the earlier model's 185 wafers/hr?

    THG editor to Aisle 1, stat!

    It's the higher dose rate, means less passes on multipass processes.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Tanakoi said:
    How is 175 wafers/hr "up from" the earlier model's 185 wafers/hr?

    THG editor to Aisle 1, stat!
    The dosage is the important part here. The higher the dosage the slower the processing is due to the exposure time. I don't believe there is any publicly facing information regarding how fast the 5000 was with higher dosages, but one can be sure it was a lot slower than 175 WPH.

    For some context: the latest EUV machine ASML is touting runs 220+ WPH at 30 mJ/cm²
    Reply
  • thestryker
    This marks Intel's third High-NA machine installation in Oregon. Seems like a positive sign that they aren't pulling back on the move.

    It will be interesting to see where the next one ends up. It makes sense that they'd want at least one commercial ready machine there, but with how expensive they are and the lower capacity of the development fab I'm not sure installing more makes sense. There's a good chance the 5000s can be upgraded as well even if they cannot reach the exact performance of the 5200B. Where ever the next one is installed should show what Intel's strategy for deploying 14A is.
    Reply