Benchmark Results: Java And Silverlight
GUIMark Java Swing 5
All of the GUIMark Java Swing 5 scores are very close, within a fifth of a frame per second. But in the end, Opera tops the competition, with Firefox and IE8 in second and third, respectively. Chrome trails behind in fourth and Safari places fifth.
Encog Silverlight Benchmark
The Encog Silverlight benchmark is a new addition to the Web Browser Grand Prix. It replaces the Bubblemark Silverlight benchmark because it is easier to get clear reading; Bubblemark's score constantly changes.
With Encog, the lower the score, the better. Opera manages to get the lowest score by a decent margin. Safari comes in second, followed closely by Firefox and Chrome. Surprisingly, IE8 scores the lowest here. This was one benchmark we thought Microsoft's browser would actually have a good chance of winning.
Related Stories :
- Safari, Firefox Post Market Share Gains Against Internet Explorer
- Internet Explorer 9 Will Have Windows 7 SP1 Bits
- Internet Explorer 9 Will Never Be on Windows XP
- Internet Explorer 9 Beta is Ready for Download
- Internet Explorer 9 Video Leaked, Scores 95 Acid3
- Microsoft's Internet Explorer 9, Dissected
- This is What Internet Explorer 9 Might Look Like
- Internet Explorer 9 Beta Launching September 15
- Microsoft Releases Internet Explorer 9 Preview 3
- Microsoft Previews Internet Explorer 9 at PDC09
July 7th - Firefox 4 beta released.
Tom's impending road test STILL BEHIND THE TIMES
I agree. Firefox 4 was supposed to have the major speed up (especially in startup time.)
But you know what, apple said they have the world's fastest browser. I think we should just pack up and call it a day. The spoken word of god is indisputable...
FF4 also has hardware acceleration
I'm very happy to see my beloved Firefox's performance.Whatever people say about Opera and Chrome, Firefox is the best IMO.And Apple is proved to be a liar from this article.
Honestly, does browser speed matter?
Forgot to add:I cant wait for the final release of FF 4!
Great review,
Have to wait for FF4 release to see how it performs compared to others
I've been using Firefox for about to two years now. I can't get enough of adblock plus. One of my favorite plug-ins.
lmao @ FFfanboys other review sites posted FF4 numbers, its performance is pathetic to say the least.
@Lady slayer, and Boi, this is only for stable releases. Notice that Chrome 6 is not benchmarked. FF4 is a beta, the final product is a long ways off. Judging on what they promising and what they implemented so far in the beta and nightly builds, I wouldn't be surprised if FF4 was delayed until early next year.
FF Fanboys always will be biases fanboys, but the fact is:
Chrome and Opera are the best ones, the others are just slugs in a F1 race.
That's the truth. Period.
I care not for speed, but for usability. Chrome's minimalistic design fits my simple needs.
Using the Windows Task Manager to measure memory usage is flawed. Browsers like Chrome that use multiple processors will be incorrectly shown to use more memory than they actually are because of how memory is shared between each process. See http://google-chrome-browser.com/c [...] ry-usage-0 for more information.
Used Firefox for yearssss. Just started using chrome a couple months ago and can't go back to slow ugly Firefox. Love the single address and search bar, tabs on top, minimalist design and speed of chrome.
First can we have an article like this every month or so, just like the graphics cards for the money articles?
Second, to sum up the article imo, IE is a clear loser, Safari comes 4th trailing Firefox in 3rd, while Chrome and Opera are up ahead, close enough to say that they share 1st and 2nd, depending on updates.
Considering how many websites are yet to be optimised, crash or just do not work for Google Chrome I fail to understand how it can be classed as a winner. When it comes to everyday use for me Chrome is way behind other more established browsers.
Firefox for Windows, Firefox for Mac OS X, Firefox for Linux & Firefox FTW.
How can Opera be #1 when they don't even have a simple ad-blocker? Functionality is much more important than a few ms of loading.