Nvidia Infuses DGX-1 With Volta, Eight V100s In A Single Chassis

If you happen to need eight Tesla V100 GPUs with a total of 40,960 CUDA cores and 128GB of GPU memory crammed into one beefy chassis, Nvidia's got you covered. Yes, the DGX-1 can play Crysis (sorry to steal your thunder, commenters), but Nvidia designed it specifically for artificial intelligence workloads in the data center.

Artificial intelligence is reshaping the face of computing from the data center down to mobile devices. Nvidia GPUs already power a good portion of today's compute-intensive AI training, which is the critical step that enables the lighter-weight inference part of the deep learning equation. Processing data on the edge through inference, such as in IoT and mobile devices, brings its unique set of challenges, but the real processing grunt work occurs in the data center. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Janissaire
    high end gaming for rich peoples lolz,you can tell it by looking at the chassis online&the premium look of the graphic card.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    NVLink 2.0 increases throughput to 10X that of a standard PCIe connection (300GB/s).
    Comparing aggregate vs. point-to-point bandwidth.
    : (
    A single NVLink2 is really just ~56% faster than PCIe 3.0 x16.
    Reply
  • drajitsh
    Paul please check. You alluded that it CAN be used a gpu, "Yes, the DGX-1 can play Crysis " . Tesla cards do NOT have display out hardware. You do NOT get DVI/DP/HDMI ports in tesla cards.
    Reply
  • coolitic
    I believe a few tesla cards had display output in the past at least, for whatever reason. But yeah, most don't.
    Reply
  • Fiqar_
    I'm so sick of everyone following apple in terms of design. Be orginal for christs sake! This looks like something straight out of an Apple launch event! I mean the premium look alone gives it away!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    19677114 said:
    I'm so sick of everyone following apple in terms of design. Be orginal for christs sake! This looks like something straight out of an Apple launch event! I mean the premium look alone gives it away!
    Wow, of all the things to pick on...

    Anyway, for those of us who don't watch Apple launch events, what are you claiming resembles them? I have no idea what you mean by "premium look".
    Reply
  • Karadjgne
    Theres no issue with not having DP out on that monstrosity, it'll never be used in a pc, not with a 3200w necessity power consumption. The only way anyone will use it with games is via network.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    19678797 said:
    Theres no issue with not having DP out on that monstrosity, it'll never be used in a pc, not with a 3200w necessity power consumption. The only way anyone will use it with games is via network.
    There's allegedly a Quadro GP100 graphics card. So, it's plausible there could someday be a Quadro GV100.

    If this is to be believed, it looks like the drivers still need work:

    http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=Quadro+GP100&id=3721
    Reply
  • Karadjgne
    Dunno, I've always wondered about that, can't be just the drivers. Look at the Quadro's out now, like the $800 m4000, it's got 1664 Cc, 192 mem interface and 8Gb vram and DP 1.2 vrs the 1080ti that has double the Cc, 352 mem interface, 11Gb vram and DP 1.4 yet is $100 cheaper. And yet the gtx can't do what that m4000 can, so I'm guessing there's considerably more to what else is on those cards than just the physical specs, cuz in gaming the m4000 is gonna get Stomped by the gtx, yet in Cad, the gtx is gonna get Stomped and it can't all be just the drivers. The Quadro's / FirePros were never really good at gaming.
    Reply
  • Elrabin
    19679533 said:
    Dunno, I've always wondered about that, can't be just the drivers. Look at the Quadro's out now, like the $800 m4000, it's got 1664 Cc, 192 mem interface and 8Gb vram and DP 1.2 vrs the 1080ti that has double the Cc, 352 mem interface, 11Gb vram and DP 1.4 yet is $100 cheaper. And yet the gtx can't do what that m4000 can, so I'm guessing there's considerably more to what else is on those cards than just the physical specs, cuz in gaming the m4000 is gonna get Stomped by the gtx, yet in Cad, the gtx is gonna get Stomped and it can't all be just the drivers. The Quadro's / FirePros were never really good at gaming.

    Why are you comparing an older model to a newer model?

    M4000 is based on Maxwell. A more fair comparison would be to the P5000 which is based on Pascal, same as the 1080

    GTX 1080 has 2560 CUDA cores at 1733 mhz and 8gb of GDDR5x

    The P5000 has 2560 CUDA cores at an unspecified clock speed and 16gb of GDDR5x

    They should perform almost identically in gaming and workstation tasks once clock speed is taken into account.

    I'm using a GTX 1080 in Nvidia IRAY 3d renders and it stomp the snot out of a M4000 for that task.

    http://www.migenius.com/products/nvidia-iray/iray-benchmarks-2016-3
    Reply