Mainstream-Ready? DDR3-1600 Shootout

Features
By
published

Benchmark Settings

Swipe to scroll horizontally
3D-GamesRow 0 - Cell 1
CrysisVersion: 1.1
Row 2 - Cell 0 Video Resolution: 1600x1200 pixels
Row 3 - Cell 0 Video Quality: High Details
Row 4 - Cell 0 Anti-aliasing: Off
Row 5 - Cell 0 Benchmark: Benchmark_CPU.bat
Supreme CommanderVersion: 3.220
Row 7 - Cell 0 Video Resolution: 1600x1200 pixels
Row 8 - Cell 0 Video Quality: High Details, High Shadows
Row 9 - Cell 0 Anti-aliasing: Off
Row 10 - Cell 0 Benchmark: 60 second game with physics
Unreal Tournament 3Version: 1.2 (Dual-Core Patch)
Row 12 - Cell 0 Video Resolution: 1600x1200 pixels
Row 13 - Cell 0 Video Quality: Highest Details
Row 14 - Cell 0 Post Processing: Intense
Row 15 - Cell 0 Benchmark: 16-bot botmatch (war-marketdistrict)
ApplicationsRow 16 - Cell 1
Grisoft AVG Anti-VirusVersion: 7.5.467
Row 18 - Cell 0 Virus Base: 269.6.1/776
Row 19 - Cell 0 Benchmark: Scanning 3.82 GB Application Folder
Maxon Cinema 4DVersion: 10.008
Row 21 - Cell 0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Row 22 - Cell 0 Benchmark: Rose Drop, 8-bits (50 Frames)
Adobe Photoshop CS3Version: 10.0x20070321
Row 24 - Cell 0 Filtering from a 69 MB TIF-Photo
Row 25 - Cell 0 Benchmark: Tom’s Guide-Benchmark V1.0.0.4
Rarlab WinrarVersion 3.70 BETA 8
Row 27 - Cell 0 Compression = Best
Row 28 - Cell 0 Dictionary = 4096 kB
Row 29 - Cell 0 Uncompressed Folder Size: 642MB
VideoRow 30 - Cell 1
TMPEGEnc 4.0 XpressVersion: 4.2.10.211
Row 32 - Cell 0 Import File: Terminator 2 SE DVD (2 Minutes)
Row 33 - Cell 0 Resolution: 720x576 (PAL) 16:9
Row 34 - Cell 0 Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Channel, English
Row 35 - Cell 0 Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160kb/s)
DivX 6.6Version: 6.6.1
Row 37 - Cell 0 Profile: Home Theater Profile (720 x 576)
Row 38 - Cell 0 1-pass, 780 kb/s
Row 39 - Cell 0 Encoding mode: Insane Quality
Row 40 - Cell 0 Enhanced multithreading
XviD 1.1.2Version: 1.1.2
Row 42 - Cell 0 Target quantizer: 1.00 (maximum quality)
Clone DVD 2Version: 2.908
Row 44 - Cell 0 DVD "Terminator II SE" (English version)
Row 45 - Cell 0 Transcoding from DVD-9 to DVD-4.7
Row 46 - Cell 0 Audio: English Dolby AC-3/6 (surround) - DTS
Row 47 - Cell 0 Subtitles: None
SyntheticsRow 48 - Cell 1
SiSoftware Sandra XIIVersion 2008.4.14.20
Row 50 - Cell 0 Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark
TOPICS
Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
23 Comments Comment from the forums
  • emp
    Unless you guys know something that I don't (which is perfectly possible), as far as I understand the X58 will have a DDR3-1066 standard, which in my eyes makes DDR3-1333 the more coveted overclocking without breaking the bank. Unless DDR3-1600 makes a REAL improvement in overclocking capabilities (and I don't think it does, isn't that one of the features the IMC is supposed to bring?), I'd like to see more DDR3-1333 round ups, which in my opinion will be the more sought after memory with the masses.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    Rumors are all over the place on the new CPU, with support for up to DDR3-2000 rumored as an option for tuners (read, overclockers). This memory overclocking mode is also rumored to be available at stock CPU speeds.
    Reply
  • cangelini
    empUnless you guys know something that I don't (which is perfectly possible), as far as I understand the X58 will have a DDR3-1066 standard, which in my eyes makes DDR3-1333 the more coveted overclocking without breaking the bank. Unless DDR3-1600 makes a REAL improvement in overclocking capabilities (and I don't think it does, isn't that one of the features the IMC is supposed to bring?), I'd like to see more DDR3-1333 round ups, which in my opinion will be the more sought after memory with the masses.
    Heya emp! It'll officially be doing DDR3-1066 out of the gate. However, you're probably going to see motherboard vendors enabling 1333, 1600, and 2000 as well, which is why we were hoping some of these modules would hit that number with overclocking.
    Reply
  • cangelini
    lacritsI recent the online survey I am promted when trying to continue in the article! There was no way for me to "x"-out the message, I had to answer in the "applet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applet " itself. I don't trust such content and would like the option to not answer in the applet at all!If I see this crap repeatadly here at Toms when viewing articles or reading other content I'll stop visiting this site altogether.. I've been a frequent visitor for years.. But this is not acceptable from a security stand point!
    I'll look into the issue you're talking about lacrits--thanks for the heads-up.
    Reply
  • geok1ng
    Sub optimal results for DDR3 2x2GB kits. To compensated for the increased tRD and timings over DDR2 counterparts DDR3 kits should achieve DDR3 1333 CAS5, DDR3 1600 CAS6 and DDR 1800 CAS7, numbers that not a single kit in the article was capable, showing that 2x2GB DDR3 kits are much more slower than 2x1GB parts. DDR3 ony makes sense on the 2:1 divider, so we are talking about DDR3 1600-1800 speeds for optimal performance but at this range only a few Motherboards accept tRDs of 6, and most cant even handle tRDs of 7. Until further results i still advocate the use if DDR2 2x2GB kits capable of CAS5 tRD5 operation mostly on the 1150-1250Mhz range, all of them south of the $200 mark...
    Reply
  • itadakimasu
    However, you're probably going to see motherboard vendors enabling 1333, 1600, and 2000 as well, which is why we were hoping some of these modules would hit that number with overclocking.

    this is said like its not happened.... my most recent build on a gigabyte p45 board is running 2gb of ocz platinum ddr3-1333 @ 750mhz like a champ...

    this was built well over a month ago and there were several boards then supporting 1600 fsb and ddr3-2000.

    my ram defaulted out at its stated 7-7-7 timings @ 667mhz stated speeds.
    Reply
  • emp
    Yep, I figured as much on my own, cangelini. However DDR3 1333 in my opinion is getting there to the "acceptable" price range, but DDR3-1600 still has a long way to go. I'd like to see soon after Core i7 and the X58 chipset is released an article about the effect of DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, and DDR3-1600 on overclocking, I believe that's when we'll be able to make an informed decision on which are "mainstream ready & accepted"
    Reply
  • cangelini
    itadakimasuthis is said like its not happened.... my most recent build on a gigabyte p45 board is running 2gb of ocz platinum ddr3-1333 @ 750mhz like a champ...this was built well over a month ago and there were several boards then supporting 1600 fsb and ddr3-2000. my ram defaulted out at its stated 7-7-7 timings @ 667mhz stated speeds.
    It hasn't--X58 isn't out yet. The response was to emp's question on Nehalem =)
    Reply
  • eodeo
    X58 isn't out yet.
    whats the point of this review than?

    ddr3 hardly offers a solid 1% over ddr2 while the price would suggest otherwise. Same goes for the i7. How fast will it have to be to compare to 3.6ghz core2 quad? at what price?

    face it, ddr3 is useless to us, and only reason any sane person would even be considering it is due to intel making it mandatory for the i7.

    sure it will be nice one day in the future. So, 'till the future comes, in a year or two, stick with ddr2 pc800, you dont need any faster anyways.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    eodeowhats the point of this review than? ddr3 hardly offers a solid 1% over ddr2 while the price would suggest otherwise. Same goes for the i7. How fast will it have to be to compare to 3.6ghz core2 quad? at what price?face it, ddr3 is useless to us, and only reason any sane person would even be considering it is due to intel making it mandatory for the i7.sure it will be nice one day in the future. So, 'till the future comes, in a year or two, stick with ddr2 pc800, you dont need any faster anyways.
    LOL, I know you meant PC2-6400. Because PC800 is DDR...RDRAM.
    Reply