System Builder Marathon, Sept. 2011: System Value Compared

Page 5 of 13:

Benchmark Results: Crysis

The overclocked $1000 build overtakes the stock $2000 build using Crysis' High Quality setting, but only if you look at the averages. After noticing the big loss at 2560x1600, we were even more surprised to see the $500 machine manage playable frame rates at its highest-tested 1920x1080 resolution.

The $500 machine reaches 1920x1080 at Crysis' Very High quality settings, while the overclocked $1000 machine looks like it might be playable at 2560x1600. Those who really want the most realistic visual settings at high resolutions will want to take a closer look at the $2000 build’s results.

Current page: Benchmark Results: Crysis

Prev Page Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra Next Page Benchmark Results: F1 2010

TOPICS

Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.

More about pc building

The Wolfbox MF100 Electric Air Duster is now only $62 — Make your PC dust-free

Fanless audiophile PC sells for close to $30,000 — music server features dual Xeon 10-core CPUs, 48GB RAM, 280GB Optane SSD, and 2TB secondary storage expandable to 24TB

Sabrent's USB Type-C M.2 SSD Enclosure reduced to just $22 at Amazon

See more latest

46 Comments Comment from the forums

hmp_goose

Value, shamlue: Will it run Crysis?

Oh: Wait …
Reply
revjacob

Actually what we need now are more affordable 2560x1600 monitors for these enthusiast PCs.
Reply
compton

I think the next quarter SBM should utilize an SSD at all segments. Its just about time when no one should seriously think of not including a SSD a build. There are great values out there and even the budget system deserves some love. If a small increase in price segments is necessary, so be it. Going from a HDD to a SSD is like going from IGP to discrete class graphics.

Also, as a result, more emphasis should be placed on the storage sub system. I know these are gaming configurations, but I'd give up my GPU in a nanosecond if it meant I could keep my SSDs. Fortunately, I don't have to choose, but I would if I had too, and I'm not alone out there. Budget systems don't feel so budget-y with even a modest SSD.
Reply
chumly

Maybe the value of the $1000 PC would go up if you weren't wasting money on unnecessary or poorly chosen parts. You could add another 4 GB of ram, and swap out the twin stuttering 460's for 6870's (and still have enough money to add a better, modular PSU).

Here:
http://i.imgur.com/g22Bq.jpg
Reply
jprahman

comptonI think the next quarter SBM should utilize an SSD at all segments. Its just about time when no one should seriously think of not including a SSD a build.
Yeah, good luck fitting an SSD into a $500 gaming build.

Reply
Kamab

jprahmanYeah, good luck fitting an SSD into a $500 gaming build.
there have been 64GB Vertex Crucial drives on sale for < 79$. Which isn't bad.
Reply
Kamab

And I meant OCZ Vertex / Crucial M4
Reply
compton

jprahmanYeah, good luck fitting an SSD into a $500 gaming build.
That's why I think the $500 system should be closer to $600, maybe like $550. 30GB Agility drives were going for $40 yesterday at the Egg, so its not like you have to spend $300 to get a tangible benefit. That one addition would have contributed a significant performance benefit and the budget category used to be $650 anyway.
Reply
nd22

I would have stick to 1 gpu in the 1000 S build. Instead of 2 gf 460/radeon 6850 I would have used 1 radeon 6970/ geforce gtx570 - from persoanl experience 1 gpu = less problems!
Reply
mayankleoboy1

i think quicksync should be included in the final score as video conversion is something that everyone of us do. and if we buy a SB cpu, then we would surely use quicksync.
maybe also include windows boot time.

Reply

Show more comments

Benchmark Results: Crysis

Benchmark Results: Crysis

Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter