Web Browser Grand Prix VIII: Chrome 16, Firefox 9, And Mac OS X
Back in August, Mozilla took the WBGP crown with Firefox 7. Can Firefox 9 retain that title? And how are the top Web browsers doing in Mac OS X? We used a Hackintosh last time. This time, we're testing on the world's first Ultrabook, the MacBook Air.
WBGP VIII Test Setup
Hardware Setup
Test System Specs | |
---|---|
Operating System 1 | Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate (64-bit) |
Operating System 2 | Apple Mac OS X Lion (64-bit) |
Model | Apple MacBook Air 11.6-inch (late 2011) |
Processor | Intel Core i7 @ 1.8 GHz (dual-core) |
Memory | 4 GB DDR3 @ 1333 MT/s |
Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 3000 384 MB DDR3 SDRAM |
Storage | 128 GB SSD |
Software Setup
Our test installations are freshly installed and fully updated as of midnight on December 20th. Power management and automatic updating is disabled before testing. The Web browsers and additional software, along with the exact version numbers tested, are listed in the table below.
Software | Version |
---|---|
Chrome | 16.0.912.63 m |
Firefox | 9.0.1 |
Internet Explorer | 9.0.8112.16421 |
Opera | 11.60 (build 1185) |
Safari | 5.1.2 (7534.5.2.7) |
Adobe Flash | 11.1.102.55 (64-bit) |
Microsoft Silverlight | 5.0.61118.0 |
Oracle Java | 6.0.30 |
Network Setup
The following table contains the system specs of the local Web server used for our startup time tests, the page load time tests, and JSGameBench.
Local Web Server Specs | |
---|---|
Operating System | Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Server Edition "Lucid Lynx" (32-bit) |
Processor | AMD Athlon @ 1150 MHz |
Motherboard | Soyo Dragon Platinum |
Memory | 512 MB DDR |
Graphics | AMD Radeon 9550, 256 MB GDDR |
Storage | 40 GB Western Digital HDD WD400BB |
Optical | Samsung DVD-ROM SD-616T |
Extra Packages | Apache2, MySQL Client, MySQL Server, PHP5, PHP-GD, PHP5-MySQL, PHPMyAdmin, SSH |
The table below holds additional information on the test network.
Network Specs | |
---|---|
ISP Service | Cox Premium (28 Mb/s down, 5 Mb/s up) |
Modem | Motorola SURFboard SBS101U |
Router | Linksys WRT54G2 V1 |
While we typically use a hard-wired Ethernet connection, due to the MacBook Air being the test system, we're debuting the use of Wi-Fi in the Web Browser Grand Prix.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Test Setup
We restart the computer and allow it to idle for a few minutes before benchmarking the next browser. Other than the conformance benchmarks, all of our final scores are an average of several iterations. More iterations are run on tests that have short durations, lower scales, and/or higher variance.
All tests are placed into one of four groups: core, observation, dated, and quarantine. Core tests are considered current. These tests are usually trusted industry standards or our own creations, and they make up the core of the WBGP suite. Tests that are either generally unknown, mostly untested, or just too bleeding-edge are placed under observation. Tests classified as dated are either outdated, losing relevance, or otherwise need replacing. We are actively seeking community feedback and contributions regarding alternatives to these benchmarks. The final group is for quarantined benchmarks. Benchmarks find their way into quarantine by delivering dubious results or by being gamed. Whenever benchmarks that test the same thing yield conflicting results, more weight is given to tests with a better rating when creating the analysis tables.
The table below lists all 53 of the tests currently in our suite (along with a version number and link, where applicable), number of iterations performed, and current rating:
Tom's Hardware Web Browser Grand Prix Test Suite v8.0 | ||
---|---|---|
Test Name | Iterations | Rating |
Performance Tests (44) | ||
Cold Startup Time: Single Tab | 3 | Core |
Cold Startup Time: Eight Tabs | 3 | Core |
Hot Startup Time: Single Tab | 3 | Core |
Hot Startup Time: Eight Tabs | 3 | Core |
Uncached Page Load Times (9 Test Pages) | 5 | Core |
Cached Page Load Times (9 Test Pages) | 5 | Core |
Kraken v1.1 | 2 | Core |
Google Kraken v1.1 Mod | 2 | Observation |
SunSpider v0.9.1 | 2 | Observation |
Google SunSpider v0.91 Mod | 2 | Observation |
FutureMark Peacekeeper 2.0 | 2 | Core |
Dromaeo DOM | 2 | Core |
Maze Solver | 5 | Core |
GUIMark2 Flash Vector Charting | 3 | Core |
GUIMark2 Flash Bitmap Gaming | 3 | Core |
GUIMark2 Flash Text Columns | 3 | Core |
Flash Benchmark 2008 v1.09.1 | 2 | Core |
GUIMark Java | 3 | Dated |
Encog Silverlight | 3 | Dated |
Facebook JSGameBench v4.1 | 2 | Core |
GUIMark 2 HTML5 Vector Charting (1 pixel variant) | 3 | Core |
GUIMark 2 HTML5 Bitmap Gaming | 3 | Core |
GUIMark 2 HTML5 Text Columns | 3 | Core |
Asteroids HTML5 Canvas 2D And JavaScript | 2 | Core |
Psychedelic Browsing | 2 | Observation |
Hardware Acceleration Stress Test | 2 | Dated |
Mozilla WebGL FishIE | 5 | Observation |
WebGL Solar System | 5 | Observation |
Efficiency Benchmarks (5) | ||
Memory Usage: Single Tab | 3 | Core |
Memory Usage: 40 Tabs | 3 | Core |
Memory Management: -39 Tabs | 3 | Core |
Memory Management: -39 Tabs (extra 2 minutes) | 3 | Core |
Reliability Benchmarks (1) | ||
Proper Page Loads | 3 | Core |
Conformance Benchmarks (3) | ||
Ecma test262 | 1 | Core |
Peacekeeper 2.0 HTML5 Capabilities | 1 | Core |
HTML5Test.com | 1 | Core |
Legend
Throughout this article there are a ton of charts, many of which house data from both Windows 7 and Mac OS X. The data in these charts is sorted by the Windows 7 score, with the best performer on top and the worst at the bottom. Windows 7 scores are represented by blue bars and OS X scores are in green. If an OS X browser outperforms all of the Windows 7 browsers, we'll indicate this occurrence by changing the color of the winning OS X browser from green to red.
Now, let's fire off the starting pistol and let the race begin!
Current page: WBGP VIII Test Setup
Prev Page Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Opera, And Safari Next Page Startup Time Performance Benchmarks-
The best part is I'm quite sure that this is using an out of the box build. Using a PGO compiled nighlty build, with about:config properly configured, and addons like Adblock/NoScript blocking things from ever loading Firefox is significantly faster than these benchmarks state.Reply
-
frost_fenix I have use firefox and chrome interchangeably for a few years now. I enjoy chromes streamlined design but have recently discovered the noscript addon for Firefox and have since favored Firefox. I have also found Firefox to be more compatable with school webpages and application pages. Still either firefox or chrome is better than IE.Reply -
pharoahhalfdead Good point Stoof. I have IE9 and the newest FF, and with the FF add ons, it blows IE out of the water. The majority of IE pages like yahoo video links, boxingscene etc take 6 or more seconds to load, whereas FF is only a fraction of the time.Reply
I think add ons are much easier to find with FF, and there seems to be a wider variety. Then again I do realize this article wasn't about browsers with add ons. -
hardcore_gamer The only one thing I hate about firefox is that it takes a lot of time to launch.Reply -
adamovera stoofThe best part is I'm quite sure that this is using an out of the box build. Using a PGO compiled nighlty build, with about:config properly configured, and addons like Adblock/NoScript blocking things from ever loading Firefox is significantly faster than these benchmarks state.Yes, we're using everything stock. There is no one-size-fits-all combination of plug-ins to standardize on, and every browser might not have the exact same plugins available. So that throws out a fair comparison between browsers - wouldn't work for the WBGP. Perhaps an article concentrating specifically on Firefox (or another Web browser) with and without various plug-ins would clear that up?Reply -
Please use Firefox's latest logo, the one with the shiny orb in Mozilla's press kit! The one they're using now is the old one. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/brand/identity/Reply
-
nevertell Chrome is the easiest to use if you've got lots of tabs open. Scrolling through them with mouse is a breeze and tab management is just excellent.Reply -
soccerdocks frost_fenix. I enjoy chromes streamlined design but have recently discovered the noscript addon for Firefox and have since favored Firefox.Reply
Why do people seem to forget Chrome has this built in. All you have to do is go into the options menu and disable JavaScript.