Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE Review: Incredible, Affordable Air Cooling Performance

Shockingly cool and quiet, less than $40!

Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE
Editor's Choice
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Cinebench Test Results

I first attempt to run Cinebench without power limits enforced. If the cooler can handle it, this load will use a little more than 230W. Unfortunately, I haven’t found an air cooler capable of passing this test, and Thermalright’s Peerless Assassin 120 SE is no exception.

When testing a more reasonable 200W CPU power limit, Thermalright’s Peerless Assassin 120 SE performed exceptionally well. In this workload, the CPU temperature averaged 61 degrees Celcius over ambient – the best resultI’ve seen from any air cooler I’ve tested, beating DeepCool’s AK500 by seven degrees C!

Thermalright’s Peerless Assassin 120 SE is also the only air cooler that has passed my 200W tests when limited to 50% fan speeds,  though it did get quite toasty when doing so.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

200W and 140W OCCT Test Results

I usually like to run OCCT's small set stress testing for stability when overclocking, but on Alder Lake, I haven't found a cooler that's capable of handling OCCT without throttling unless power limits are enforced.

I test OCCT at 200W to demonstrate a thermally demanding load, but also with a 140W power limit enforced to show how these coolers might perform with a CPU that's easier to cool, like Intel's i5-12600K or AMD's Ryzen 5800X.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

With OCCT, Thermalright’s Peerless Assassin SE continued to deliver outstanding results. While it wasn’t able to pass 200W with reduced fan speeds in this scenario, at the default fan curve it averaged 64 degrees C over ambient – once again degrees C cooler than DeepCool’s AK500!

Where things get really interesting with the Peerless Assassin 129 SE is in lower wattage loads. In fact, I had to retest these results multiple times because I couldn’t believe my own results. When limited to 140W and with fans running at the default fan curve, the Peerless Assassin SE outperformed every cooler I’ve tested – including many high-end AIOs. At 140W with fans reduced to 50% speeds, Thermalright’s cooler tied with BeQuiet’s Pure Loop 2 FX and Cougar’s Poseidon GT360 AIOs for the best cooling performance.

95W OCCT Test Results

Due to requests from our readers, I’ve begun to include 95W results, which should be broadly applicable to CPUs like AMD’s Ryzen 5 5600V or Intel’s Core i5-12400. In these lower wattage tests, the Peerless Assassin once again lives up to its name, outperforming it’s nearest rival by six degrees C when fans ran at the default fan curve, and a whopping 12 degrees C when set to 50% fan speeds.

These results are even more interesting when you consider that most coolers do worse when limited to 50% fan speeds in this test. But the Peerless Assassin does better. This is because it runs at less than 50% fan speeds in this test using the motherboard’s default fan curve.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Noise Levels and Acoustics

To test noise levels, I used the SLM25TK Sound Level Meter positioned 18 inches behind the rear of the Be Quiet Silent Base 802 PC case, and recorded early in the morning to achieve the lowest noise floor possible. The chart below shows averaged results, measured over the course of five minutes, to account for sudden sound spikes.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

In all workloads tested, the Peerless Assassin 120 SE ran very quietly. When running at maximum fan speeds, it is the second-quietest cooler we’ve tested thus far. At an enforced 50% fan speed, it runs quieter than all coolers we’ve tested except for Cooler Master & Corsair’s AIOs.

Conclusion

I was truly amazed by the performance of Thermalright’s Peerless Assassin 120 SE, especially when you consider its low $36 price. I had to retest this cooler multiple times before I would believe my own testing results! It is by far the best-performing airr I’ve tested, capable of handling 200W+ with Intel’s Core i9-12900K, while running whisper silent, and it absolutely murders its competition in lower TDP workloads. Whether you care about value or not, you should consider this cooler for your next system build.

Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • RichardtST
    Awesome. So it should work pretty well if I remove the fan covering the RAM? Or move it to the other side? Gotta have my pretty RGB RAM and cannot be covering it up! Mounting system looks like a breeze too.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    looking at amazon there is a large number of options for this cooler. black, white, with or without argb. the non se version is also there which seems like it just adds a couple extra sockets it can mount to.

    https://www.amazon.com/Thermalright-Peerless-Assassin-Aluminium-Technology/dp/B09LGY38L4?th=1

    i like the grey of the non se version and it's only a couple bucks more. might just pull the trigger on this for my 5900x to give it some room to breathe. i'm a sucker for a good buy :)
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    RichardtST said:
    Awesome. So it should work pretty well if I remove the fan covering the RAM? Or move it to the other side? Gotta have my pretty RGB RAM and cannot be covering it up! Mounting system looks like a breeze too.

    You could try mounting the fan on the opposite end, but I think it would be less effective this way. It should still work well.
    Reply
  • wifiburger
    nice review!

    I have this cooler on my spare/tv system, 1080ti with day1 3900x, fans only go 50% when using 160w or 65c temps

    You can reduce some of the noise by having the pull fan on different fan header with 5-10% less PWM vs the push fan.

    I wasn't expecting much quality for the fans for the low price but the included fans are crazy good, almost Noctua level for air / low noise.

    Prime95, below 85c with 50% speed. Pretty good for air cooler with my hot running day 1 3900x.
    Reply
  • tennis2
    Difficult to increase sample size with multiple TH reviewers. Leaves me wondering about comparison to the Deepcool AS500 (or similar single-tower 140mm coolers, Scythe Fuma 2, etc.) Would be nice if testing can be normalized in a way that allows results to be transferred/combined for larger lists.

    The Scythe Fuma 2 has some obvious compatibility benefits: Offset fins, and a 15mm front fan. Seems like some sort of shroud for the center fan of the PA120SE would've been a welcome inclusion to make removal of the front fan a viable alternative in the case of RAM clearance issues. Duct tape at $36 I suppose.

    Can't deny that value though. For $36...no brainer. Hopefully price doesn't shoot through the roof as more people learn about this product.
    Reply
  • Co BIY
    Looking at the construction do you see anything different that leads to such great performance ?
    Reply
  • Exploding PSU
    Math Geek said:
    looking at amazon there is a large number of options for this cooler. black, white, with or without argb. the non se version is also there which seems like it just adds a couple extra sockets it can mount to.

    https://www.amazon.com/Thermalright-Peerless-Assassin-Aluminium-Technology/dp/B09LGY38L4?th=1

    i like the grey of the non se version and it's only a couple bucks more. might just pull the trigger on this for my 5900x to give it some room to breathe. i'm a sucker for a good buy :)

    Same here, I watched a few reviews about this cooler sometimes ago and I'm looking to pick one up in white. It's rare to see a good air cooler in white.
    Reply
  • philhay
    The review here mentions AM5 compatibility but the manufacturer's page doesn't and I don't see it mentioned on a few seller's sites. Originally I'd read that AM5 compatibility is a given for an AM4 cooler. But more recently I've also read it might not be that simple, particularly for an AM4 cooler that has it's own backplate. Anybody shed any light? Thanks
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    in the very limited couple days we've had with am5, i've not seen anything to say otherwise. everything i have seen says am4 coolers are compatible.

    but i'd give it a couple weeks for info to come in before jumping in myself. let others be the guinea pigs and find out if something does not work :)

    i never jump head first into a new platform anyway. there is ALWAYS bugs to work out no matter who is making it. let the first couple months go by for BIOS updates, new featurs, fixes and so on rather than being the one who has to suffer all the issues
    Reply
  • helper800
    Math Geek said:
    in the very limited couple days we've had with am5, i've not seen anything to say otherwise. everything i have seen says am4 coolers are compatible.

    but i'd give it a couple weeks for info to come in before jumping in myself. let others be the guinea pigs and find out if something does not work :)

    i never jump head first into a new platform anyway. there is ALWAYS bugs to work out no matter who is making it. let the first couple months go by for BIOS updates, new featurs, fixes and so on rather than being the one who has to suffer all the issues
    I bought the 3900x on day one and had some "interesting" BIOS related issues for about 6 weeks and apparently the 3000 series had a much better launch than the 2000 and 1000 series Ryzen chips. I would not say buying day one new platform CPUs is a bad idea but new adopters should be ready for some "interesting" BIOS, performance, or other unforeseen compatibility issues.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    yah probably better way to say it.

    i don't want to be the beta tester so i wait. but if you can handle working with any potential bugs and don't mind doing it, then early adoption is not the worst thing ever :)
    Reply