When it comes to delivering solar power to a PC, the input voltage levels and the type of power supply used play the most important roles. A conventional solar power module puts out the equivalent of 16 V DC.
Specifications label from one of the solar panels we used for this build
There are two ways to route electricity from our solar modules to our solar-powered PC. Both approaches come with their own pros and cons, as we will see.
Conventional Input Voltage: Too Much Power Goes To Waste
If the decision is to use conventional A/C input to the PC, lots of energy-efficient standard components may be used. This approach requires the use of a transformer that converts the 16 V DC output from the solar modules into conventional alternating current (110/120 V in North America, 230 V in Europe). That enables use of a standard power supply in the PC itself, which then converts back from A/C to DC, and adjusts voltage levels once again.
Transformers required when using conventional A/C input to the PC
If you look at this sequence of power transforms, it's easy to see that it doesn't make much sense to switch from DC to A/C from the solar module to the PC's power supply, which then switches back from A/C to DC a second time. This type of double power transformation could result in the loss of as much as 25% of the output energy in the form of waste heat, thereby boosting power requirements to service the PC.
16V DC Input Voltage Requires A Special Power Supply
It's much more effective to stick to direct current, and to take the 16 V DC output from the solar modules straight into the PC. But this requires a special power supply.
Transformer required when handling 16 V DC input to the PC
By directly connecting the power outputs from the solar modules to the PC's power supply, only a single transformer is required, which greatly lowers the amount of energy wasted in that transfer. Using 16 V DC input directly does have a disadvantage as compared to using conventional A/C power, though: in transporting energy from the solar modules to the PC, a lot of current is wasted in overcoming resistance in the cables that tie them together. The reason is that the voltage levels are low, which means the current levels are high, and loss is proportional to current. We knew we could take certain steps to offset these energy losses, so we decided to go the 16 V DC route anyway. How we managed energy delivery to the PC, and built the necessary supporting equipment, chose our solar modules and storage batteries, and so forth, is covered in the third installment of this solar-powered PC saga.
- A New Desktop PC Power Consumption World Record: 61 Watts
- Power Delivery: Conventional A/C (120/230V) Or 16 Volts DC?
- Delivering 16 V DC From A Solar Panel
- Delivering 16 V DC From A Solar Panel, Continued
- Efficiency Is Where It's At
- Efficiency Is Where It's At, Continued
- Best Choice: AMD Athlon 64 X2 BE-2350
- 1 Watt Active Cooling Takes Very Little Power
- Energy-saving Motherboard: Gigabyte With HDMI And DVI
- Energy-saving Motherboard: Gigabyte With HDMI And DVI, Continued
- Comparing Energy Draw: MSI Vs. Gigabyte
- Motherboard Comparison
- Measurements: Energy Consumption For Onboard Components
- Major Differences Among Hard Disks: WD Comes Out Best
- Comparing DVD Drives: Samsung Wins With 3.5 Watts Consumed
- The Monitor Is A Real Energy Hog: 23 Watts When In Use
- The Monitor Is A Real Energy Hog: 23 Watts When In Use, Continued
- 61-Watt Solar-Powered PC: Storage Batteries Allow Operation In The Dark
- 61-Watt Solar-Powered PC: Storage Batteries Allow Operation In The Dark, Continued