Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Conclusion

AMD Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6 Edition: One Card, Six Screens
By

Surely, the Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6 Edition is a specialty product, aimed at the few folks out there willing to “go big” on displays. Its competitive position is made that much stronger by the fact that Nvidia’s flagship maxes out at two simultaneous outputs.

Despite the fact that this card comes six months after the Radeon HD 5870 launch (and indeed leverages the same technologies we’ve praised in the last half-year), its feature set remains cutting-edge. All is not perfect here, though. By itself, the idea of Eyefinity 6 is enthralling. But factor in the rest of the multi-monitor ecosystem and you’re left a little less enchanted.

AMD’s partnership with Samsung sounded like a fantastic move last September, and we’re disappointed that the fruits of that collaboration haven’t yet materialized. When they do, a Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6 / single-stand, six-display Samsung setup will represent the ultimate in six-display aesthetics. It remains to be seen how the PVA-based screens perform, though. To its credit, AMD has tried on several occasions to provide us with ETAs on the Samsung screens. But after multiple delays, it’s no longer willing to try pegging availability.

In the meantime, these Dell P2210Hs are a bit of a tease. I can almost get them lined up perfectly, but not quite. The inch and a half of bezel in the middle of the screen is almost enough to make me want to try playing the latest first-person shooters in the lab, but not quite. I want so very badly to tell you that this is the coolest thing I’ve ever had on a desktop, and that you should go out and buy a setup right now. But I won’t, at least not yet.

Knowing how much all of this gear costs, as a package, I can’t help but think that a display setup able to match the elegance of the Eyefinity 6 card is needed to make it all worthwhile.

While I can see myself using six monitors for productivity-oriented tasks, I, personally, cannot game with 1.5” of bezel spanning the entire 3x2 arrangement. I’m a competitive person. Like 50 Cent, I don’t like getting shot (even if it’s just in a game). The P2210H setup currently in the lab gives up too much playable real estate to the bezel, and it’s distracting. I am, however, hoping that Samsung’s thin-bezel array is the solution.

Perhaps more realistic is a dual display group setup, where your top three monitors are devoted to productivity and the bottom three are used for gaming. In this config, all of the action is centered on your middle display. It’s much more playable, to be sure. And if six display outputs are a must have for business reasons, AMD’s Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6 card is the only game in town.

Of course, the Radeon HD 5970, 5870, and 5850 are also viable options if you’re going the 3x1 route. One gigabyte of memory per GPU won’t hurt the performance of these cards until you start cranking up the anti-aliasing. And even then, you’ll want to consider Eyefinity 6 cards in CrossFire to keep the frame rates playable.   

AMD is claiming immediate availability. We’ll be keeping our eyes on the channel and updating Best Graphics Cards For The Money accordingly. But you probably shouldn’t rush to buy the Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6 Edition right away (especially if six-monitor gaming is your Holy Grail). Let’s see how Samsung’s hexa-display array improves the experience first. Right now, there’s just too much bezel in the way.

On the other hand, if you can’t wait to get your hands on this card for what it’ll do for your financial charts, IT management console, or desktop productivity workflow, then congratulations, this is probably the first high-end 3D board you’ve ever considered for business computing.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 116 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 27 Hide
    phantomtrooper , March 31, 2010 4:11 AM
    I would hate playing with that much black area between screens. I will stick with my 1080p monitor thank you.
  • 26 Hide
    mtyermom , March 31, 2010 5:33 AM
    This begs the question: how long until we have zero-bezel displays?
  • 20 Hide
    magicbullet , March 31, 2010 4:47 AM
    wow......i feel so poor.
Other Comments
  • 27 Hide
    phantomtrooper , March 31, 2010 4:11 AM
    I would hate playing with that much black area between screens. I will stick with my 1080p monitor thank you.
  • 11 Hide
    megamanx00 , March 31, 2010 4:22 AM
    :o  They got two of those cards!! Lucky punks.
  • 2 Hide
    megamanx00 , March 31, 2010 4:38 AM
    Glad they compared the 1GB and 2GB cards in a 3x1 setup. Glad I got my 5870 instead of waiting for a 2GB card :D . Even so, I want some thin bezel monitors before I hook up three of them. The bezel on my HP LCD is just to think so I'm not keen on buying another two.
  • 2 Hide
    duk3 , March 31, 2010 4:40 AM
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125322&cm_re=5870-_-14-125-322-_-Product
    Immediate availability? Yes.
    Even in stock! (When linked :p  )
  • 20 Hide
    magicbullet , March 31, 2010 4:47 AM
    wow......i feel so poor.
  • 3 Hide
    Anonymous , March 31, 2010 4:52 AM
    Should have just made the 5970 the eyefinity edition
  • 0 Hide
    ltcommander_data , March 31, 2010 5:27 AM
    So I guess Apple's miniDP connector is quite useful after-all and is now seeing adoption outside of Macs.

    It's too bad you didn't test GTA IV like you used to do. I believe GTA IV at max settings exceeds 1GB of VRAM usage so perhaps 2GB graphics cards may be of some use assuming the game isn't still CPU limited despite 12 threads with the Core i7 980X. At the very least, I'm guessing Liberty City at 6048x2276 would be amazing.
  • 26 Hide
    mtyermom , March 31, 2010 5:33 AM
    This begs the question: how long until we have zero-bezel displays?
  • 8 Hide
    oldscotch , March 31, 2010 5:47 AM
    Obviously, the best solution is a 3x3 grid of displays to make sure your centre focus is not interfered with.

    Lesse, that'd be 5760 x 3240.
    No sweat ;) 
  • 5 Hide
    Anonymous , March 31, 2010 5:52 AM
    So, I guess if you already have a 1GB 5870 and 3x1 Eyefinity setup, the only advantage of the 2GB version is being able to pile on the AA/AF effects and still have a playable frame rate.
  • -4 Hide
    N.Broekhuijsen , March 31, 2010 5:58 AM
    you made my FullHD 22inch screen look like nothing.... I did not know such a thing was possible.... :( 
  • -3 Hide
    SpadeM , March 31, 2010 6:36 AM
    On a personal note, i'd buy Alienware's curved lcd .. maybe 2 of them .. i mean it's not the same resolution output but still, less bezel problems and it looks, in my opinion, way cooler.
  • 4 Hide
    husker , March 31, 2010 6:45 AM
    Does the card require the configuration of 6 displays in landscape? I'm thinking maybe 5 displays side-by-side rotated in portrait would make a better option to avoid the center bezel. This would give a resolution of something like 5864 x 1920 (allowing for bezel correction). The ratio of width to height would then be about 3 to 1, which would be close to ideal, imo. Then use the other single monitor for live chats, twitter, etc.

    This would also avoid the requirement for the specialized hardware to hold the monitors, assuming they have the capability of being rotated 90 degrees on their standard base.

    Great article, thanks.
  • 8 Hide
    welshmousepk , March 31, 2010 6:48 AM
    6x 1080p projectors would be nice.

    now i just need to win the lottery.
  • 5 Hide
    lutel , March 31, 2010 7:03 AM
    now it is time for bezelless LCDs
  • 2 Hide
    cangelini , March 31, 2010 7:09 AM
    huskerDoes the card require the configuration of 6 displays in landscape? I'm thinking maybe 5 displays side-by-side rotated in a portrait would make a better option to avoid the center bezel. Then use the other single monitor for live chats, twitter, etc.This would also avoid the requirement for the specialized hardware to hold the monitors.Great article, thanks.


    Nope, you can move them around, if you have the physical mounting hardware to support your desired config. The actual display groups do need to be in arrays of some sort, though.
  • 1 Hide
    anamaniac , March 31, 2010 7:26 AM
    Excellent article Chris.
    What sexy cards. I think the GTX 480/470 look ugly, and believe that reference ATi cards always win for looks. =D

    huskerDoes the card require the configuration of 6 displays in landscape? I'm thinking maybe 5 displays side-by-side rotated in a portrait would make a better option to avoid the center bezel. Then use the other single monitor for live chats, twitter, etc.This would also avoid the requirement for the specialized hardware to hold the monitors.Great article, thanks.

    I run a 3x1 setup with all monitors in portrait mode. I couldn't stand in the insane stretching at the edge of every monitor due to the insane aspect ratio.
    welshmousepk6x 1080p projectors would be nice. now i just need to win the lottery.

    I considered a 5x1 projector setup, but I eventually gave up on the thought realizing at some point I need to buy a car...

    I honestly believe a 5x1 all portrait oriented setup would be superior. This also gives you a reasonable aspect ratio (as games don't do well with insane aspect ratios).
    The only problem with running monitors in portait mode is the viewing angle. If you're like me and use cheappy TN panels, it can be horrible if you move your head even just a few inches.

    The active DP to DVI adaptors cost $150 in Canada. =(
    I tried using a passive (which still cost $50), and it worked (2048x1152), for 15 minutes. After that, it decided to no longer work, and so I dropped way too much money for the active (which had its own issues).
    Why not miniDVI or miniHDMI instead? (other than the ridiculous HDMI licensing fees, but really, we're paying $200+ for these cards, deal with it).

    At 3456x2048 a 5770 1GB is more than enough for most games still, and I can add a little AA to a few.
    Now only if all games natively supported any resolution and were hort+. I can only use my triple display configuration on about half of my library. I shouldn't have to be doing .ini, registry and hex hacks.
    ATi should give us some software equivalent to one Matrox gave it's TH2G/DH2G users (instantly modified game .ini's etc.). Or at least include the address http://widescreengamingforum.com/ with the card...

    What about a triple slot card? There was a 2GB 4870x2 (Gainward Rampage700 2048MB) triple slot card, and it was a beast, while offering a extra display output. I would be comfortable with a triple slot 5970 or 5990 (5890x2 or whatever they want to call it, IF they ever make it).
    How about some 3GB (6GB for x2) cards?
    A 5970 8GB (with a 384bit bus) triple slot with six miniDP (with 6 RAMDACS and includes 6 miniDP to DVI and HDMI adaptors) with a massive air cooled copper block and both GPU's are handpicked is something easily worth well over $1000. Run three 4K projectors on that (in all portrait, running at 6480x3840 @ 24.9MP) watch as people go change their pants. =D
    Anyone remember the Asus Mars GTX 285x2 4GB that almost soldout on preorders alone? There is a market for it.
  • 1 Hide
    anamaniac , March 31, 2010 7:28 AM
    cangeliniNope, you can move them around, if you have the physical mounting hardware to support your desired config. The actual display groups do need to be in arrays of some sort, though.

    I used a hardware store for my needs. I bought a hammer, a bag of nails, and five feet of wood. No way in hell was I going to spend hundreds on proper mounts, when $25 would achieve the same result, albeit ugly as hell.
  • 17 Hide
    gti88 , March 31, 2010 7:41 AM
    I don't think I could enjoy a game with these black bezels.
  • -3 Hide
    yyk71200 , March 31, 2010 8:19 AM
    Me want to play Crysis at 7680x3200 max quality, AA, and AF.
Display more comments