Gigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X motherboard review: Striking in white, with lots of USB

An updated AM5 board with fast storage (two PCIe 5.0 sockets) and a unique white/gray appearance

Gigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X
Editor's Choice
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Firmware

Gigabyte updated its BIOS on this board, which undoubtedly improved the previous version. The updated Easy Mode is laid out logically and displays plenty of information about the system, processor, RAM, fan speeds, and has several selectable options, including XMP profiles and RAM tweaks, Re-Size BAR support, Smart Fan 6 access, and more. The black background and white characters are easy to read, while the purple and blue accents on the top and bottom provide a much-needed visual update.

The Advanced mode also received a facelift. While all headings are still across the top, they are now larger ‘buttons’ and easily selectable with a mouse. The highlight bar (where you are on the page) is Aorus Orange and easy to see. Every option you need and want is at your fingertips, and you don’t have to drill down several layers to reach the most commonly used functions – especially if you populate your selections in the Favorites section.

Software

Several months back, Gigabyte released a new software suite called the Gigabyte Control Control (GCC). GCC is a one-stop shop that controls several functions, from RGB and Fan control to hardware monitoring and overclocking. It’s also helpful in finding, downloading, and installing driver updates to your system. It’s a simple application that does its job. It’s also a much cleaner tool than the previous App Center and gets our approval for the breadth of functionality it brings users.

Test System / Comparison Products

We’ve updated our test system to Windows 11 64-bit OS with all updates applied. We kept the same Asus TUF RTX 3070 video card from our previous testing platforms but updated the driver. We also updated to F1 22 for our games and kept Far Cry 6. Unless otherwise noted, we use the latest non-beta motherboard BIOS available to the public. The hardware we used is as follows:

Test System Components

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CPUIntel Core i9-13900K
MemoryGSkill Trident Z DDR5-5600 CL36 (F5-5600U3636C16GX2-TZ5RK)
Row 2 - Cell 0 Kingston Fury Beast DDR5-6000 CL36 (KF560C36BBEAK2-32)
GPUAsus TUF RTX 3070
CoolingCoolermaster MasterLiquid PL360 Flux
PSUEVGA Supernova 850W P6
SoftwareWindows 11 64-bit (22H2)
GraphicsNVIDIA Driver 522.25

Benchmark Settings

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Synthetic Benchmarks and SettingsRow 0 - Cell 1
ProcyonVersion 2.6.848 64
Row 2 - Cell 0 Office Suite (Office 365), Video Editing (Premiere Pro 23.6), Photo Editing (Photoshop 25.0, Lightroom Classic 12.5)
3DMarkVersion 2.27.8177 64
Row 4 - Cell 0 Firestrike Extreme (v1.1) and Time Spy (v1.2) Default Presets
Cinebench R24Version ‘build unknown’
Row 6 - Cell 0 Open GL Benchmark - Single and Multi-threaded
BlenderVersion 3.6.0
Row 8 - Cell 0 Full benchmark (all 3 tests)
Application Tests and SettingsRow 9 - Cell 1
LAME MP3Version SSE2_2019
Row 11 - Cell 0 Mixed 271MB WAV to mp3: Command: -b 160 --nores (160Kb/s)
HandBrake CLIVersion: 1.2.2
Row 13 - Cell 0 Sintel Open Movie Project: 4.19GB 4K mkv to x264 (light AVX) and x265 (heavy AVX)
Corona 1.4Version 1.4
Row 15 - Cell 0 Custom benchmark
7-ZipVersion 21.03-beta
Row 17 - Cell 0 Integrated benchmark (Command Line)
Game Tests and SettingsRow 18 - Cell 1
Far Cry 6Ultra Preset - 1920 x 1080, HD Textures ON
F1 2022Ultra Preset - 1920 x 1080, Ultra High (default) Bahrain (Clear/Dry), FPS Counter ON

MORE: Best Motherboards

MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard

MORE: All Motherboard Content

Joe Shields
Motherboard Reviewer

Joe Shields is a Freelance writer for Tom’s Hardware US. He reviews motherboards.

  • HideOut
    $330 for ALC 897 audio? thats a JOKE! My 2.5 year old AMD 5900X system has a newer codec than that, on a board that was $132.49 WITH 2.5G ethernet and all. I know inflation blah blah blah, but this what, 2.7X more or something? Its pathetic. But hey, THG gets a cut if you buy this "bargain" pile from their link
    Reply
  • Ogotai
    heh, id just disable the audio on any board, and put my SB AE-4 Plus into it, problem solved...
    Reply
  • 35below0
    HideOut said:
    $330 for ALC 897 audio? thats a JOKE! My 2.5 year old AMD 5900X system has a newer codec than that, on a board that was $132.49 WITH 2.5G ethernet and all. I know inflation blah blah blah, but this what, 2.7X more or something? Its pathetic. But hey, THG gets a cut if you buy this "bargain" pile from their link
    Who gives a rat's ass about the audio codec though? The other features pointed out are the draw.
    Audio components are kinda meh all the way to the top end Gigabyte boards anyway.

    Granted, it would be nice if it were better, but i don't think a professional would be any happier with a slightly better (less crap) codec. And non-professionals will either not care or will happily step up to a higher end model to get what this board offers *and* more.
    Reply
  • Notton
    I'm not too into audio, but don't they all skip the onboard audio when you send the sound through HDMI, AptX-LL enabled BT, or 2.4Ghz wireless?

    Like, if you care about audio so much, why not spend a little bit on a HDMI/USB DAC, or HDMI audio splitter?
    I'm sure they are better EMI shielded than mobo audio too.
    Reply
  • Sleepy_Hollowed
    If I was buying this for audio, I'd just slide a pcie card and not touch the integrated one.

    I have not used my on board card for a long time since I either use a USB DAC or a pci-e (not so much recently though) card if I need to get the CPU load out of the equation for audio..
    Reply
  • Aurn
    Notton said:
    I'm not too into audio, but don't they all skip the onboard audio when you send the sound through HDMI, AptX-LL enabled BT, or 2.4Ghz wireless?

    Like, if you care about audio so much, why not spend a little bit on a HDMI/USB DAC, or HDMI audio splitter?
    I'm sure they are better EMI shielded than mobo audio too.

    From what I found, you are correct, in the case of wireless speakers or headphones, the onboard audio is bypassed, so its quality does not matter. (And same in the case of HDMI.) But not everyone has or wants to use wireless speakers. I still use my 21-year old Creative speakers, which need the rear audio jack (black colour) and I’d rather not add yet another external peripheral (external sound card in this case). I just don’t like this trend of new mainboards skimping on audio quality and ports at the same time when you already don’t have much room for extra PCIe cards because graphics cards are thick. I’m glad I got the MSI B650 Tomahawk WiFi when I changed PCs in October ; it has noticeably better audio than my previous ASRock X370 Taichi and still has five audio jacks and optical output
    Reply
  • WonkoTheSaneUK
    Typos in the "test system components" table, unless the testers did manage to fit an Intel 13900K into an AM5 motherboard?

    I've owned this motherboard since before Xmas (imported via NewEgg), so I may have had the first one in the UK.
    I can cofirm the retail box includes all the usual bits (WiFi antenna, SATA cables, etc), but the manual has to be downloaded.
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    For anyone looking at this motherboard for use with the 9000 series it works quite well. I had to update my BIOS using Q-Flash Plus to support the 9000 series but once that was done it works with 6400MHz Team T-Create Expert RAM without any IF offset.
    Reply