System Builder Marathon, Q3 2013: $350 Bonus Entry-Level PC
Deals
By
Paul Henningsen
published
Results: Compression
Sporting a stronger quad-core processor and faster storage drive, the $350 PC takes victories in all three compression utilities. Its only loss is in the OpenCL-enabled workload, where last quarter's Radeon HD 7750 discrete card pulls off a single win. The current build's most impressive victory comes from 7-Zip, since that utility fully exploits AMD's modular Piledriver architecture.
Current page: Results: Compression
Prev Page Results: Productivity Next Page Results: F1 2012 And The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimStay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
TOPICS
85 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
slomo4sho Nice choice in parts (unlike their mid/high end counterparts, the low end MSI boards continue to disappoint. Maybe consider Biostar, ECS, or ASRock in future low end builds) . However, those wanting to cheat can pickup a 750K with 7770 within $20-30 of the price of the APU for overall improved gaming performance. It is interesting what $40-50 can accomplish in these low budget builds :)Reply -
internetlad Have to admit, I like where this went. This is a little higher than a similarly priced build I was looking at for my brother in law about a year agoReply
-
rolli59 Well throw in a HD7750 (can be had for $50 after MIR) and it will keep up with the $400 system in gaming. Since MIR do not count reduce the ram to 2x2GB (Q2 $400build) to offset the cost.Reply -
pauldh The promo is now back, so the A10-5800K was (for us) and is once again $110 from Newegg no rebates. We can't match that price too easy with HD7750/7770. Although as rolli said $50 after $30 mail-in rebate + a Pentium gets close (AR).Reply
EDIT: My mistake! Actually this is a different promo. A $20 gift card. When we chose this part, the savings instantly removed $20 from the shopping cart total. -
sicom So a $350 PC has better performance than an Xbox 360, and a $400 PC blows it clear out of the water. Cost of operating system not withstanding. I realize this console generation is nearly ancient history by now, but I still find that interesting, and perhaps because it's not ancient history yet.Reply
Note of reference: BF3 plays at 720p @ 30 FPS at about medium'ish settings on 360/PS3. -
pauldh 11609414 said:Nice choice in parts. However, those wanting to cheat can pickup a 750K with 7770 within $20-30 of the price of the APU for overall improved gaming performance. It is interesting what $40-50 can accomplish in these low budget builds :)
That must be a pretty big cheat. ;) But that pairing sure stymies the 6800K's appeal doesn't it.
You are so right, $40-50 more does wonders. We could make a fun poor man's marathon out of exploring that alone.$400/450/500 gaming faceoff? :D -
aggroboy
You're using 2012-2013 components to compare against a 2005 console.11609551 said:So a $350 PC has better performance than an Xbox 360, and a $400 PC blows it clear out of the water. Cost of operating system not withstanding. I realize this console generation is nearly ancient history by now, but I still find that interesting, and perhaps because it's not ancient history yet.
Note of reference: BF3 plays at 720p @ 30 FPS at about medium'ish settings on 360/PS3. -
itzsnypah 750K HD7750 4GB RAM and you have much better computer (overall and gaming) for the same price.Reply
750K vs A10-5800K (CPU wise)
The same (except 750K no graphics to cool)
7750 vs 7660D
512 vs 384 shaders
GDDR5 vs DDR3
800Mhz vs 800Mhz
Did you even consider this or did you go into this budget with your heart set on an APU? -
pauldh 11609701 said:750K HD7750 4GB RAM and you have much better computer (overall and gaming) for the same price.
750K vs A10-5800K (CPU wise)
The same (except 750K no graphics to cool)
7750 vs 7660D
512 vs 384 shaders
GDDR5 vs DDR3
800Mhz vs 800Mhz
Did you even consider this or did you go into this budget with your heart set on an APU?
That's an easy answer. The math simply didn't (and still doesn't) add up.
The cheapest 7750 was $85, the 750K was also $85. That's $170 when the 5800K was $110 with a promo code anyone buying one would have used to save instantly before checking out. The goal was $325 factoring that promotional instant savings.
And as mentioned in the text on page one, a 4GB mem kit saved only $10, meaning 750K+7750 was still $50 over, which is huge on a $325 budget.
Although, I knew before order time playing by the rules we'd call this a $350 PC. Hope that all makes sense.
-
Memnarchon The current APU costs $130. And the memory costs $50. Total: $180.Reply
Now if you place an Athlon X4 750K 3,4Ghz for $80 or an Ivybridge Pentium G2120 3,1Ghz $70, using a HD 7770 for $90 and for memory 4GB (2 x 2GB) for $35 it will be total: Intel: $195 ($15 more) and AMD:$205 ($25 more).
Now for $15/$25 you can have double or more performance on games. Why to go with an APU???
edit: I actually read the article and didn't read all the comments.
But even if you choose not to go with 7750, according to Tom's hierrarchy chart the 6670 (even the DDR3 version) is still two tiers faster. And I can't remember even prvious month the 6670DDR3 to cost more than $60 (maybe less with some AR) So a 750K or a G2120 (or a bit lower) will still offer better performance at almost same price (the pentium will be the same price) with 4GB RAM.
Most Popular