EVGA 850 B3 PSU Review

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Load Regulation, Hold-Up Time & Inrush Current

To learn more about our PSU tests and methodology, please check out How We Test Power Supply Units. 

Primary Rails And 5VSB Load Regulation

Load Regulation testing is detailed here.

Hold-Up Time

Our hold-up time tests are described in detail here.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

The hold-up time we observed is longer than 20ms, and the 850 B3's power-good signal is accurate.

Inrush Current

For details on our inrush current testing, please click here.

The inrush current is normal for this unit's capacity.

Load Regulation And Efficiency Measurements

The first set of tests reveals the stability of the voltage rails and the 850 B3's efficiency. The applied load equals (approximately) 10 to 110 percent of the PSU's maximum load in increments of 10 percentage points.

We conducted two additional tests. During the first, we stressed the two minor rails (5V and 3.3V) with a high load, while the load at +12V was only 0.1A. This test reveals whether a PSU is compatible with Intel's C6/C7 sleep states or not. In the second test, we determined the maximum load the +12V rail could handle with minimal load on the minor rails. 

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test # 12V 5V 3.3V 5VSB DC/AC (Watts) Efficiency Fan Speed (RPM) Fan Noise (dB[A]) Temps (In/Out) PF/AC Volts
1 5.210A 1.985A 1.991A 0.980A 84.785 80.878% 0 <6.0 43.15°C 0.954
12.128V 5.047V 3.310V 5.092V 104.831 38.55°C 115.18V
2 11.444A 2.971A 2.992A 1.181A 169.620 85.014% 0 <6.0 45.29°C 0.982
12.125V 5.041V 3.305V 5.076V 199.521 40.50°C 115.18V
3 18.052A 3.478A 3.510A 1.380A 254.853 86.712% 1218 27.3 41.24°C 0.989
12.119V 5.036V 3.300V 5.060V 293.906 46.13°C 115.19V
4 24.648A 3.977A 4.001A 1.584A 339.727 87.533% 1276 29.0 41.29°C 0.992
12.112V 5.032V 3.296V 5.045V 388.113 46.48°C 115.20V
5 30.912A 4.974A 5.009A 1.785A 424.624 87.466% 1338 30.7 41.63°C 0.994
12.104V 5.026V 3.292V 5.029V 485.473 46.95°C 115.22V
6 37.193A 5.977A 6.022A 1.994A 509.607 86.950% 1462 34.3 42.72°C 0.995
12.094V 5.021V 3.287V 5.010V 586.089 48.26°C 115.19V
7 43.502A 6.981A 7.038A 2.199A 594.560 86.345% 1600 36.1 43.47°C 0.996
12.079V 5.017V 3.282V 4.992V 688.583 49.30°C 115.20V
8 49.797A 7.987A 8.058A 2.410A 679.494 85.549% 1743 40.0 44.14°C 0.996
12.071V 5.010V 3.275V 4.975V 794.273 50.18°C 115.18V
9 56.545A 8.488A 8.583A 2.414A 764.493 84.596% 1885 42.2 44.62°C 0.996
12.060V 5.007V 3.271V 4.965V 903.702 50.88°C 115.18V
10 63.031A 9.005A 9.088A 3.036A 849.365 83.782% 1885 42.2 45.71°C 0.997
12.052V 5.002V 3.267V 4.935V 1013.785 52.33°C 115.18V
11 70.143A 9.016A 9.099A 3.042A 934.308 82.482% 2014 43.1 46.20°C 0.997
12.041V 4.997V 3.262V 4.925V 1132.742 53.15°C 115.18V
CL1 0.098A 14.023A 14.004A 0.004A 117.803 77.549% 1432 32.6 44.59°C 0.974
12.123V 5.027V 3.292V 5.107V 151.908 50.67°C 115.20V
CL2 70.778A 1.004A 1.003A 1.002A 865.942 83.783% 2003 43.0 47.16°C 0.996
12.046V 5.011V 3.278V 5.022V 1033.550 53.82°C 115.18V

Load regulation is pretty tight on every rail, particularly considering this PSU's price point. Better still, the 850 B3 delivers more than its full power at 46°C.

The registered efficiency levels are low though, especially under full load. And the fan speed profile is quite aggressive once the operating temperature and load increase. Of course, this is a low-efficiency PSU, so high fan speeds are expected; they help keep the internal temperature manageable. As a result, EVGA's 850 B3 easily satisfies the 80 PLUS Bronze requirements, even under high operating temperatures.


MORE: Best Power Supplies


MORE: How We Test Power Supplies


MORE: All Power Supply Content

TOPICS
Aris Mpitziopoulos
Contributing Editor

Aris Mpitziopoulos is a contributing editor at Tom's Hardware, covering PSUs.

  • orionfotl
    There's a typo in the Final Analysis: "Although we're glad the 850 B3 didn't blow up like the 450W model, this is our second (so fat) B3-series power supply to die on the bench."
    So fat.

    Shame on the PSU.
    Reply
  • Aris_Mp
    (so far) Thanks!
    Reply
  • Realist9
    Part of what I got from this review and the associated charts is that my next psu will likely be a Corsair unit.
    Reply
  • dstarr3
    It seems like the general wisdom is still "Don't buy a PSU unless it has a 7- to 10-year warranty." The best products from the best OEMs always come with those warranties lately.
    Reply
  • Aris_Mp
    If you ask me the warranty isn't an indication from the moments it is 5 years long. On the other hand when a company avoids sending some specific PSUs for review, then the whole thing looks suspicious.
    Reply
  • dstarr3
    20217010 said:
    If you ask me the warranty isn't an indication from the moments it is 5 years long. On the other hand when a company avoids sending some specific PSUs for review, then the whole thing looks suspicious.

    I don't necessary mean that longer warranty = better product. I just mean that there are some OEMs that are better than the rest, and their best PSUs are the best on the market, and all those best PSUs happen to have 7- to 10-year warranties on them. So if you see that warranty on a PSU right now, you can reasonably assume that it is one of the best models from one of the best OEMs.
    Reply
  • Olle P
    I don't totally agree with the "Pros" and "Cons":
    * Six 8-pin PCIe-connectors are supposed to be capable of delivering up to 900W. This PSU can't handle that.
    * The efficiency is as advertised. That's neither a "Con" nor a "Pro". (In fact I'm impressed with the efficiency at 20W load. Expected worse.)
    * Sleeve bearing is what makes the fan relatively quiet, so it's not a "Con" per se. Had it been a ball bearing fan you'd written "High noise level" as a "Con" instead.
    Reply
  • Aris_Mp
    Efficiency is a con in general. It is low

    If the fan had DBB and an optimal fan profile then it wouldn't be a con. A sleeve bearing fan in a 100 buck PSU doesn't look good and those type of bearings are suited for horizontal installation so they should normally be avoided in PSUs.
    Reply
  • obsidian86
    Seasonic focus 850 currently for $10 more than this settles it
    Reply
  • al3xand3r
    Hi Aris, congratulations for the wonderful review and all of your work.
    I've seen all of your reviews, but one thing I do not understand compared to other review sites and that's related to the advanced transient tests. For example, the be quiet! Pure Power 10 600W PSU, in Advanced Transient Test at +12V, 20% - 20ms has a voltage drop of 0.211V. At 50% load 20 ms is a voltage drop of 0.222 volts. Instead, at ardOCP, the same PSU records a 0.520 volt voltage drop at 20% load - 10 ms and 0.540 volts at 50% load – 10ms. And that's a huge difference. And I do not think this difference is because of the reduced time from 20ms to 10ms because at 1ms wich is tougher the drops it's not as high. What is wrong with ardOCP methodology?
    Is it possible that a quality PSU like this to have a voltage drop in load so high (0.52 Volts)? And that's just an example. At all the PSU’s I've seen on both sites are differences like this. Same as when you were doing only 50ms or 200ms. Is there any explanation for these figures that do not coincide?
    Thank you
    Reply