Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Our 2022 GPU testbed consists of a Core i9-12900K processor, MSI Pro Z690-A DDR4 WiFi motherboard, and DDR4-3600 memory (with XMP enabled). We're running Windows 11 with the 22H2 update applied to ensure we get the most out of Alder Lake. We're also running the latest game patches and Intel drivers at the time of testing: Intel 30.0.101.3435.
Intel's drivers have come a long way in the past year or so, but that's also because they had a long way to go. While the Xe Graphics in 11th Gen and later CPUs are more capable than earlier iterations, we've run into plenty of games that just didn't work properly — Deathloop, Horizon Zero Dawn, and Assassin's Creed Valhalla all had issues in the past. There were lots of other games that didn't work right at launch as well.
Of our 14-game test suite, only one game straight up refused to run: Minecraft with ray tracing enabled. Minecraft itself could run just fine, but Microsoft (Mojang Studios) implemented a whitelist of cards that could support ray tracing, rather than just querying the hardware. We had a few other problems, including Fortnite refusing to launch with the initial 3433 test driver, but nothing that absolutely stopped us from testing the games.
That isn't the same thing as saying you won't encounter issues with your PC or the games you want to play. For example, AMD and Nvidia have been building dedicated graphics card drivers for decades and have processes to test and fix bugs. Likewise, Intel has worked to improve its driver team, but only time will tell if it can truly support games to the same level as its competitors.
As discussed in the Arc A770 review, you'll also want to ensure your PC is relatively recent before using an Arc GPU. Intel says that resizable BAR support is required; without it, performance suffers a lot. That should mean that any Intel 300-series chipset or later could work, but not every board actually has the necessary BIOS updates available, and the MSI MEG Z390 Ace WiFi board I use for power testing won't POST (Power On Self Test) with only the Arc GPUs installed; it needs a second graphics card in a different slot to POST.
Our test suite will be the same 14 games as in other recent reviews. Eight of the games are tested without ray tracing, with six more relatively demanding ray tracing games (minus Minecraft for now). While the primary target for the Arc A750 is 1080p and 1440p, we also did some 4K testing just to see how the card fares compared to the A770 at higher resolutions.
The competition consists of ten other GPUs besides the two new Arc A700-series cards. We've included the AMD and Nvidia cards that match up against Arc, along with some GPUs that are at least somewhat close in terms of price and performance. If you want to see every graphics card we've tested, check our GPU benchmarks hierarchy — we'll update that and add Arc to the list shortly.
- MORE: Best Graphics Cards
- MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy
- MORE: All Graphics Content
Current page: Intel Arc A750 Test Setup
Prev Page Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition Card Next Page Intel Arc A750 Gaming PerformanceJarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.
-
cknobman Performance numbers better than expected.Reply
Power usage and temperatures are less than desired. -
tennis2 TBH, not an unexpected outcome for their first product. The DX12 emulation was a strange choice, forward-thinking sure, but not at that much cost to older games they know reviewers are still testing on. Was wishing/hoping Intel's R&D budget could've gotten a little closer to market parity (I'm sure they did also for pricing) but I don't know what their R&D budget was for this project. Seems like their experience in IGP R&D could've been better extrapolated into discrete cards, but apparently not.Reply
My biggest concern is future support. They said they're committed to dGPUs, but this product line clearly didn't live up to their expectations. Unless we're all being horribly lied to on GPU pricing, it doesn't seem like Intel is making much/any money on the A750/770. Certainly not as much as they'd hoped. If next gen is a flop also.....who knows, maybe they call it quits. Then what? Would they still provide driver updates? For how long?
I do wonder what % of games released in the past 2 years (say top 100 from each year) are DX12.... -
JarredWaltonGPU
Intel will continue to do integrated graphics for sure. That means they'll still make drivers. But will they keep up with changes on the dGPU side if they pull out? Probably not.tennis2 said:TBH, not an unexpected outcome for their first product. The DX12 emulation was a strange choice, forward-thinking sure, but not at that much cost to older games they know reviewers are still testing on. Was wishing/hoping Intel's R&D budget could've gotten a little closer to market parity (I'm sure they did also for pricing) but I don't know what their R&D budget was for this project. Seems like their experience in IGP R&D could've been better extrapolated into discrete cards, but apparently not.
My biggest concern is future support. They said they're committed to dGPUs, but this product line clearly didn't live up to their expectations. Unless we're all being horribly lied to on GPU pricing, it doesn't seem like Intel is making much/any money on the A750/770. Certainly not as much as they'd hoped. If next gen is a flop also.....who knows, maybe they call it quits. Then what? Would they still provide driver updates? For how long?
I do wonder what % of games released in the past 2 years (say top 100 from each year) are DX12....
I don't really think they're going to ax the GPU division, though. Intel needs high density compute, just like Nvidia needs its own CPU. There are big enterprise markets that Intel has been locked out of for years due to not having a proper solution. Larrabee was supposed to be that option, but when it morphed into Xeon Phi and then eventually got axed, Intel needed a different alternative. And x86 compatibility on something like a GPU (or Xeon Phi) is going to be more of a curse than a blessing.
I really do want Intel to stay in the GPU market. Having a third competitor will be good. Hopefully Battlemage rights many of the wrongs in Alchemist. -
InvalidError About the same performance per dollar as far more mature options in the same pricing brackets, not really worth bothering with unless you wish to own a small piece of computing history.Reply -
Giroro So what's the perf/$ chart look like without Ray Tracing results included?Reply
I mean I love Control and everything, but I've been done with it for years. I googled "upcoming ray tracing games" and the top result was still that original list from 2019.
There's so few noteworthy RT games, that I'm surprised that Intel and the next gen cards are even bothering to support it.
Also, I'm not really understanding how the hypothetical system cost that was discussed would be factored into the math. -
InvalidError
Chicken-and-egg problem: game developers don't want to bother with RT because most people don't have RT-capable hardware, hardware designers limit emphasis on RT for cost-saving reasons since very little software will be using it in the foreseeable future.Giroro said:There's so few noteworthy RT games, that I'm surprised that Intel and the next gen cards are even bothering to support it.
As more affordable yet sufficiently powerful RT hardware becomes capable of pushing 60+FPS at FHD or higher resolutions, we'll see more games using.
It was the same story with pixel/vertex shaders and unified shaders. Took a while for software developers to migrate from hard-wired T&L to shaders, give it a few year and now fixed-function T&L hardware is deprecated.
Give it another 5-7 years and we'll likely get new APIs designed with RT as the primary render flow. -
drajitsh
@jaredwaltonGPUAdmin said:The Intel Arc A750 goes after the sub-$300 market with compelling performance and features, with a slightly trimmed down design compared to the A770. We've tested Intel's new value oriented wunderkind and found plenty to like.
Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition Review: RTX 3050 Takedown : Read more
Hi, I have some questions and a request
Does this support PCIe 3.0x16.
For Low end GPU could you select a low end GPU like my Ryzen 5700G. this would tell me 3 things -- support for AMD, Support for PCIe 3.0, and use for low end CPU -
krumholzmax REALLY THIS IS PLENTY GOOD? Drivers not working market try to AMD and NVIDIA BETTER AND COST LEST _ WHY SO BIG CPU ON CARD 5 Years ago by performance. Who will buy it? Other checkers say all about this j...Reply -
boe rhae krumholzmax said:REALLY THIS IS PLENTY GOOD? Drivers not working market try to AMD and NVIDIA BETTER AND COST LEST _ WHY SO BIG CPU ON CARD 5 Years ago by performance. Who will buy it? Other checkers say all about this j...
I have absolutely no idea what this says. -
ohio_buckeye I don't need a card at the moment since I've got a 6700xt, but the new intel cards are interesting. If they stay around with them, I might consider a purchase of one on my next upgrade if they are decent to help a 3rd player stay in.Reply