NVIDIA GeForceFX 5900 Ultra: The Way FX is Meant to be Played!!

Page 15 of 33:

Unreal Tournament 2003

Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: GeForceFX 5900 Ultra
Page 3: 256 Bit Memory Interface
Page 4: Ultra Shadow Technology
Page 5: Floating Point Ops
Page 6: Comparison Table
Page 7: Detonator FX
Page 8: Aniso Image Quality
Page 9: Aniso Image Quality, Continued
Page 10: Test Setup
Page 11: Benchmarks
Page 12: DOOM III - Medium Quality
Page 13: DOOM III - High Quality
Page 14: Doom III - Medium Quality 4xFSAA
Page 15: Unreal Tournament 2003
Page 16: 2xFSAA
Page 17: 4xFSAA
Page 18: 8x Anisotropic
Page 19: 4xFSAA & 8x Aniso
Page 20: Serious Sam: The Second Encounter
Page 21: 2xFSAA
Page 22: 4xFSAA
Page 23: 8xAnisotropic
Page 24: 4xFSAA & 8xAniso
Page 25: Splinter Cell
Page 26: 3DMark 2001 SE
Page 27: Fillrate
Page 28: Shader Performance
Page 29: 3DMark 2003
Page 30: Shader Performance
Page 31: Codecreatures
Page 32: Average Number Of Polygons
Page 33: Conclusion

Unreal Tournament 2003

Normal

In the standard tests, the GeForceFX cards easily pull ahead of the ATi siblings. Above 1024 x 768, the gap between the 5900 Ultra and the 5800 widens considerably.

Current page: Unreal Tournament 2003

Prev Page Doom III - Medium Quality 4xFSAA Next Page 2xFSAA

Topics

Components

GPUs

Graphics