Sager NP8156 Gaming Laptop Review

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Battery, Thermal, And Display Testing

Battery Test - Tomb Raider 2013 Battery Rundown

To test battery life, we set each laptop’s battery profile to Balanced while running Tomb Raider’s built-in benchmark at the lowest detail preset. The frame rate is locked at 30 FPS through GeForce Experience’s Battery Boost to limit the strain on the battery. Meanwhile, a script running in the background monitors and time stamps the system’s battery percentage. The laptops are set to hibernate once battery levels reach 5%. We test the battery life twice at the laptop’s maximum brightness and at 200 nits.

The Sager NP8156 has demonstrated excellent performance so far, making its battery life scores a bit disappointing. It finishes in last place, lasting a little over 1 hour and 30 minutes. Comparatively, the more powerful Acer Predator 17 can game for an extra 15 minutes. On the upper end of the scale, the MSI Phantom Pro—packed with the same components—offers 20 more minutes of game time compared with the NP8156.

Thermal Testing

For our thermal testing, we use our Optris PI 640 infrared camera. For more information about how we test, be sure to check out our Measurement Science article.

At idle the Optris detects GPU heatsink and heat pipe temperatures hovering around 42°C while the CPU’s respective cooling solution (remember these are separate on this laptop) emits a warmer 48°C. After a 15 minute Furmark stress test, the GPU’s heatsink and heat pipes remain within an acceptable range of 71°C; our AIDA64 temperature log supports this with a maximum detected temperature of 72°C. On the other hand, the CPU's cooling doesn't handle the stress test very well. Furmark raises the heatsink’s temperature into dangerous territory, and the corresponding heat pipe doesn’t do much to alleviate the problem. The separate cooler design is refreshing to see, but it unfortunately it doesn't seem to help (or worse). Longer heat pipes spanning across both heatsinks and exhaust fans may have provided much better thermal dissipation. Admittedly, Furmark is an incredibly strenuous torture test, but a CPU shouldn't get this hot.

You'll also notice that the area around the GPU inductors and MOSFETs are incredibly hot as well, but our thermal tests are conducted without the bottom cover of the laptop attached in order to get a clear view of the GPU. The thermal pads will keep these components cool when the bottom cover is attached to the NP8165. The same cannot be said for the CPU.

Display Testing

We used the SpectraCal C6 Colorimeter to measure the NP8156’s display. Be sure to check out our Display Testing Explained article for a full description of our test methodology.

The NP8156 has a G-Sync display, which is useful for smooth framerates, but that hardly matters if the display  is inadequate. Luckily, our Colorimeter reports excellent contrast values; the white luminances are adequately bright while the black luminances are nice and dark. The crisp contrast creates a vibrant image that earns the NP8156 first place among this comparative set, although a handful of laptops have exhibited greater contrast levels in the past—the MSI GT73VR Titan Pro's display contrast exceeded 1200:1.

RGB balance is decent, but there's certainly room for improvement. From 0-30% brightness, the RGB levels are balanced, but you’ll begin to notice color errors as you turn your brightness higher. In particular, the green levels slowly drop while the red and blue levels stay relatively constant, creating a purple tint. At 100% brightness, the blue levels increase dramatically, adding more blue to that purple hue.

The NP8156’s gamma levels fluctuate wildly, rising above 2.2 until 30% brightness, and plummeting to around 1.8 from 50-90% brightness. This drags the average gamma far below our target of 2.2. The DeltaE 2000 values are quite high, which translates to abundant color errors. The NP8156 exhibits poor grayscale and average color accuracy; unfortunately Sager (or rather, Clevo) isn’t unique in this regard. Almost every laptop we’ve received struggles with grayscale and color accuracy.

  • jaber2
    If I was looking for a gaming laptop your test has convinced me this isn't it, and that I should look at acer
    Reply
  • JQB45
    I was interested till I saw "Inefficient CPU cooling", that's when I decided this wasn't for me. The lack of a standard hard drive to go with the SSD wasn't a deal breaker for me as a 1TB HDD is a fairly cheap and relatively easy upgrade. But I've had a laptop with poor cooling - Never Again will I allow myself to have a laptop with poor CPU OR GPU cooling.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    I'm looking at Sager's configuration tool.

    The M.2 SSD defaults to a 250GB Western Digital blue SATA drive. A SanDisk X400 isn't even a selectable option.
    Reply
  • deadsmiley
    Good review. I have dealt with Sager and cooling issues before with my NP8278. SHOULDN'T have to deal with it.
    Reply
  • Clamyboy74
    You forgot to mention another deal-breaker, it can switch between G-sync and optimus if you want to save battery life. I don't know how you guys could possibly miss this, its mentioned in the manual too (C-2 in the back of the manual)
    Reply
  • Clamyboy74
    Also, many resellers (Xoticpc, HID, Gentech) sell this exact laptop for a lower price (WITH 1TB HDD around $50 less) than the sager store, and you get a much better warranty along with it through the reseller. There is also a 120hz option (although it costs extra) which is nice and might be a good investment for fps gamers. Lastly, xotic and HID both support prema bios, which allows you to tweak many settings that are locked by default without voiding warranty, so you could undervolt the cpu and get an even better battery life. Best thing about sager/clevo to me is the huge amount customization that they allow, unlike every other manufacturer
    Reply
  • HERETIC-1
    Hi Alex,
    Need to move the decimal point in the specs-even the evil crapple can't
    make a lappy that thin.(.098" 2.5mm)
    In your internal description-" two 2.5" SATA slots and one M.2 slot for storage"
    I believe there's 2 x M2 slots-I think if you go NVME you can only use one-
    but if SATA you can use both...............................................
    Reply
  • cats_Paw
    +35 dollars for a thermal compound.
    Btw, check the difference in price between a 1060 and a 1070....
    Then check the price difference between a laptop with a 1060 and a 1070 (everything else the same).

    Its a rip off.
    Reply
  • JQB45
    19465424 said:
    +35 dollars for a thermal compound.
    Btw, check the difference in price between a 1060 and a 1070....
    Then check the price difference between a laptop with a 1060 and a 1070 (everything else the same).

    Its a rip off.

    Just for reference, what is the difference? I felt the same way when comparing the 960m or 965m to the 970m.
    Reply
  • drajitsh
    Unless you live deep inside a cave, in Siberia (cold & dark) why would you want a laptop with such a horrible display and poor cooling.
    If you are not gaming, or the laptop is overheating, you can always switch off the DGPU and use the iGPU, but I can't think of any case where you can switch off the CPU
    Reply