Ukraine war fuels rise of killer AI robots — report details rapid evolution using consumer drones and Raspberry Pi

AI robot in an office setting
(Image credit: Shutterstock)
8

Many have feared the day we must recognize that killer AI robots have come to fruition. They say necessity is the mother of invention, and Ukraine’s need for a means to continue fighting its war with Russia cannot be denied. So, the country has become a Silicon Valley for drones, autonomous weaponry, and more.

The country’s tech industry has begun adapting consumer technology, much of it right off the shelf, for modern warfare. The New York Times says companies are creating “technology that makes human judgment about targeting and firing increasingly tangential.” Autonomous systems currently keep a “human in the loop” to select and confirm targets. “Human in the loop” is an oft-used phrase by policymakers and AI ethicists, and one fear is that it may not always remain a requirement of the technology.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jeff Butts
Contributing Writer

Jeff Butts has been covering tech news for more than a decade, and his IT experience predates the internet. Yes, he remembers when 9600 baud was “fast.” He especially enjoys covering DIY and Maker topics, along with anything on the bleeding edge of technology.

  • hotaru251
    luckily for it the singularity will have all the drones it needs to take over world as soon as it happens.
    Reply
  • CmdrShepard
    It's easy to stop the wars -- just vote all warmongering politicians out of the office.

    (That'd be like all of them?)
    Reply
  • derekullo
    Trained to destroy apples with extreme prejudice!
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    CmdrShepard said:
    It's easy to stop the wars -- just vote all warmongering politicians out of the office.

    (That'd be like all of them?)
    Sigh.....

    I was going to try to preempt any political junk in this.

    But the 2nd comment in, usurped me.


    So....No more political junk.
    Please?
    Reply
  • KnightShadey
    USAFRet said:
    Sigh.....
    I was going to try to preempt any political junk in this.
    But the 2nd comment in..

    Oh sure.... take the side of Skynet... or you meant 2nd reply in. 🤔😉🙃😜

    I'm on the fence on the debate of robots killing people, if it can better determine combatant vs non-combatant, then I'd say that's an improvement over the classical method. 💀

    It is true that over time, IN GENERAL, collateral damage / non-combatant deaths have been a lower percentage from generation to generation, but that has also come about from computer assisted devices like guidance systems, smart bombs, drones, etc. The idea that a human is on the other end doesn't really change the result for the target. However if it is possible to be more precise and also put fewer people at general risk , then is the tradeoff worthwhile?

    It's definitely far superior to A,B,C weaponry, which is much worse than Ai IMO. ☢️☣️📛
    So if you don't completely ban the former, then the latter is fair game, even if they all pose existential threats. ☠️
    Just don't give the latter control of the former, keep it conventional. 🧐
    Reply
  • ivan_vy
    potential hacking or AI going rogue is a major concern.
    Imagine a battlefield with machines in eternal warfare and humans living in basements.
    Reply
  • gamerk316
    ivan_vy said:
    potential hacking or AI going rogue is a major concern.
    Imagine a battlefield with machines in eternal warfare and humans living in basements.
    Which isn't too large a concern when you remember they're limited by both ammunition and the ability to stay operational for more then a few hours due to fuel/battery constraints.

    Now, put AI in charge of ammo/fuel production, or start slapping fission reactors on them, *then* you can be concerned. Right now, all we'd really need to do is hide in a basement for 12 hours or so and wait for them to die out.
    Reply
  • ivan_vy
    gamerk316 said:
    Which isn't too large a concern when you remember they're limited by both ammunition and the ability to stay operational for more then a few hours due to fuel/battery constraints.

    Now, put AI in charge of ammo/fuel production, or start slapping fission reactors on them, *then* you can be concerned. Right now, all we'd really need to do is hide in a basement for 12 hours or so and wait for them to die out.
    solar powered, battery backed, connected to the grid, replenish energy by another drone...who's wanna go out and check how many rounds are still in the chamber?
    how long can we wait? food and water might run out faster than fuel.
    Reply