ViewSonic XG2401 24-inch FreeSync Monitor Review

Conclusion

At this time a year ago, IPS/QHD gaming monitors were practically non-existent. We saw plenty of choices in TN screens but users made it clear that they wanted better tech. Today, premium displays are more common but they aren't cheap by any means. $600 is a lot to pay for a 27-inch monitor but once you've had a taste of adaptive refresh, of either the G-Sync or FreeSync variety, it's hard to go back.

Thanks to FreeSync we have some less-expensive choices. And panel manufacturers continue to crank out TN panels to keep prices in check. It may seem like they're relying on old technology to get the job done but in our experience, the newest products are distinctly better than their predecessors, especially in the areas of color accuracy and screen uniformity.

If value is to be the top priority, as it is for most of us, one should consider the merits of a display like the XG2401. It offers the best contrast we've measured outside of a VA panel. It has superb color accuracy; good enough to burn through graphics tasks if need be. And it's just as fast and responsive as more expensive monitors. The only real flaw we found was in its gamma tracking. But that's not sufficient reason to pass it over. We think it has excellent image quality.

While many users are waiting for larger QHD displays to drop below $300, 24-inch FHD screens can offer a comparable gaming experience while saving you at least $200. One might put that leftover cash towards a faster video card, in fact. In our experience, gaming detail, especially in fast-moving fps titles, is pretty much the same perceptively whether you see it on a 27-inch QHD panel or a 24-inch FHD one. The difference in pixel density is, after all, only 17ppi.

If you can forgo features like blur reduction or a larger FreeSync range, the XG might be for you. Its 24-inch size means viewing angles aren't a big factor and FHD resolution is far easier for a budget video card to deal with. And you won't have to calibrate it to see a vivid picture with lots of depth and contrast.

That depth proved to be a boon in our favorite games. Not only is the image bright and vivid, motion quality is as good as any premium monitor we've played on. When detail is set to high levels, we can't honestly say we missed the greater resolution. You really won't be giving up that much if you choose to save money on a monitor like this.

For solid build quality, excellent contrast and color accuracy, we're giving the ViewSonic XG2401 our Tom's Editor Approved Award.

MORE: Best Computer Monitors
MORE: Display Calibration 101

MORE: The Science Behind Tuning Your Monitor
MORE: All Monitor Content

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware, covering Monitors.

Follow us on Facebook, Google+, RSS, Twitter and YouTube.

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject
15 comments
    Your comment
  • darthtomas_admin
    1st lol. On the serious note, is the panel native 8-bit one? That contrast ratio looks too good to be true .....
    -3
  • Amdlova
    i need this!
    1
  • eklipz330
    48hz isn't optimal but it sure as hell is still damn good. 20hz would be perfect.

    freesync is kicking ASS. i hope nvidia continues to rest on their laurels as AMD picks up more market share and becomes a more formidable competitor.
    3
  • RockyPlays
    Buying this asap.
    1
  • karloe
    CONS: 48Hz lower FreeSync --> Christian, didn't you hear about Low Framerate Compensation?
    144 > 2,5x48 --> meaning LFC is on so the actual FreeSync range is 0-144Hz
    1
  • rantoc
    *yawn* Yet another low res 1080p....
    -8
  • ubercake
    Great contrast. Definitely a plus for gaming. If you have the goods to keep framerates above 48 consistently, this monitor looks like a catch.
    1
  • darthtomas_admin
    Christian, could you confirm screen part number ( is it real 8-bit one or 6-bit+dithering ) please.
    0
  • sillynilly
    Another low price monitor good for a low range gaming rig. Not my cup of tea, but cool that the market isn't abandoning the cheaper options for peeps that don't run the latest, greatest parts in their rigs.
    -3
  • slashdot
    Not sure why people diss the "low price monitor", but Freesync and Gsync needs to encompass a larger range of price point. Faster value adoption means paying less "premium" for Freesync/Gsnyc in the top range. Otherwise, adaptive sync would be niche tech that would die in a year and two, and the so-called "premium feature" would no longer be supported.
    2
  • ubercake
    Anonymous said:
    Not sure why people diss the "low price monitor", but Freesync and Gsync needs to encompass a larger range of price point. Faster value adoption means paying less "premium" for Freesync/Gsnyc in the top range. Otherwise, adaptive sync would be niche tech that would die in a year and two, and the so-called "premium feature" would no longer be supported.


    This is definitely a scary fact. If this goes away due to lack of demand/lack of creating demand due to high cost, it will be something we merely talk about as history in 5 years... e.g. Remember when?

    Nvidia needs to take the reigns and decide not to charge such a higher premium so they can get people hooked on the benefits of G-sync while AMD who originally said there would be no premium for FreeSync kind of fibbed. The mark up is definitely not as harsh as G-sync though it is still there.

    Both companies need to sell this tech to consumer TV manufacturers as well or it may very well die off though I sure hope not.
    0
  • Aslam_
    Anyone knows how this compares to the Aoc G2460pf or Acer Xf240h?
    0
  • jkhoward
    I love my FreeSync monitor.. I wouldn't trade it for the world.
    0
  • Thomas_123
    Quote:
    Anyone knows how this compares to the Aoc G2460pf or Acer Xf240h?


    The Acer XF240H has bad Colours and is still too bright for my Eyes, even with Brightness and Contrast set to 0!
    0
  • Aslam_
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Anyone knows how this compares to the Aoc G2460pf or Acer Xf240h?


    The Acer XF240H has bad Colours and is still too bright for my Eyes, even with Brightness and Contrast set to 0!

    Thanks. Asus has also just released the MG248Q. I guess this is the best of the 4 in terms of panel quality.
    0