MIT's Protonic Resistors Enable Deep Learning to Soar, In Analog

Artistic rendition
(Image credit: MIT)
6

A team of researchers with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have been working on a new hardware resistor design for the next era of electronics scaling - particularly in AI processing tasks such as machine learning and neural networks. 

Yet in what may seem like a throwback (if a throwback to the future can exist), their work focuses on a design that's more analog than digital in nature. Enter protonic programmable resistors - built to accelerate AI networks by mimicking our own neurons (and their interconnecting synapses) while accelerating their operation a million times -- and that's the actual figure, not just hyperbole.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Francisco Pires
Freelance News Writer

Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.

  • Krotow
    In short - they discovered new use for pulverized sand.
    Reply
  • shady28
    Protonic resistors sounds cool.
    Reply
  • All star trekky
    Reply
  • blargh4
    All this research towards human obsolescence, definitely not something we might regret in 50 years
    Reply
  • eye4bear
    More and more I think the Romulans are right about AI....
    Reply
  • bit_user
    I wonder if the 10^6 improvement is also accounting for the overhead of digital multiplication. If so, I wonder which datatype they used as the basis for comparison (my guess is fp32, but there are far more efficient options supported in recent hardware: bf16, int8, and even fp8 and int4).

    I also wonder how well analog neural nets will scale. It seems to me that the more signal propagation you have, the more noise can get amplified. To counteract that, you might need more redundancy, which in turn could impose a practical limit on scalability. And scale is what limits the complexity of "reasoning" it can perform, as well as how much it can "remember".

    Analog computing is nothing new, nor are its intrinsic efficiency advantages. Yet, there are reasons why computing went decidedly digital. This makes me a little skeptical of just how far we can get by turning back to analog.

    One more thought: I'm no expert, but I thought our neurons are actually sort of digital in amplitude (i.e. being driven by voltage spikes), but operate in the continuous time domain. There's a whole class of digital neural networks which aims to emulate these characteristics, called "spiking neural networks".
    Reply