AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Review: New Gaming Champ Beats Pricier CPUs

Sub-$450 CPU is even faster for gaming than Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The $449 Ryzen 7 7800X3D delivers incredible gaming performance that easily beats Intel's flagship Core i9-13900K while also dethroning AMD's own Ryzen 9 7950X3D as the fastest gaming chip on the market. However, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a specialized chip optimized specifically for gaming, so it trails Intel’s competing Core processors in productivity applications.

AMD's pricey Ryzen 9 7950X3D and its sibling the 7900X3D arrived to critical acclaim, but the company held back the much less expensive Ryzen 7 7800X3D until April 6. From a business perspective, that makes a lot of sense — the 7800X3D offers slightly more gaming performance for $250 less than the flagship, which doesn’t leave much reason to buy the flagship if you’re only interested in gaming.

Below, we have the geometric mean of our gaming test suite at 1080p and 1440p and a cumulative measure of performance in single- and multi-threaded applications. We conducted our gaming tests with an Nvidia RTX 4090, so performance deltas will shrink with lesser cards and higher resolution and fidelity settings.

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • colossusrage
    Nothing surprising here. Waiting for Black Friday to pick one up either cheaper or with some kind of bundle at Microcenter.
    Reply
  • atomicWAR
    Staring at my 7950X3D chip and smiles...I need more cores personally and I have zero problem shutting down a CCD to get max FPS when the need arises which will beat the 7800X3D due to 250mhz higher clocks. Plus if I know a game hates/could care less about the extra cache I can switch CCDs to use the higher clocks. Regardless though this sounds like a great chip. I need to build a rig for my nephew who is graduating high school this year, he might benefit from a 7800X3D if I am nice...otherwise hell just get a 7700X lol.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    No real surprise here. For gaming only the 7800x3d is the best choice. That's why I was a little surprised the came out with a 7900 and 7950 variant.

    On a side note. When you compare the cost of the 7800x3d + AM5, it's actually only slightly more expensive than upgrading from a 12900k to a 13900ks (700 vs 890 with decent components and 32 GB of DDR 5). If your upgrading from something older than 12th gen Intel or 3000 series AMD it's hard to call the pricing a con in that scenario. Upgrading from either of those in a gaming only environment the prices are pretty close in a 13900k vs 7800x3d when you add all the component prices together.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    The reviewer forgot to mention one big con:
    Might get fried the second you boot it up the first time...
    (if you upgrade from a different CPU and the bios settings are not extremely strickt set for the x3d chip)
    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/overclocking-bug-5800x3d
    Reply
  • healthy Pro-teen
    TerryLaze said:
    The reviewer forgot to mention one big con:
    Might get fried the second you boot it up the first time...
    (if you upgrade from a different CPU and the bios settings are not extremely strickt set for the x3d chip)
    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/overclocking-bug-5800x3d
    It doesn't burn the chip itself, but the bug does allow you to mess with the voltages, so you can fry it but only if U manually (intentionally) push the voltage to insane levels like Igor did.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    healthy Pro-teen said:
    It doesn't burn the chip itself, but the bug does allow you to mess with the voltages, so you can fry it but only if U manually (intentionally) push the voltage to insane levels like Igor did.
    As I said, if you forget that you had higher Vcore for your previous CPU you can fry it on the spot.
    Reply
  • healthy Pro-teen
    I watched the hardware unboxed review where a currently $140 motherboard ($125 MSRP) was able to keep up with a 7950X. there are many options for motherboards under $200 to run this chip without any issues, platform pricing is much better than it was at launch.
    Reply
  • King_V
    TerryLaze said:
    As I said, if you forget that you had higher Vcore for your previous CPU you can fry it on the spot.
    So, if someone who already bought an AM5 CPU, which could have been purchased, AT MOST, 6 months ago, and has over-volted it, and has decided to swap in a 7800X3D....

    That seems like an absurdly niche case. And, for the tiny number of people who are swapping from one AM5 chip to this one, and over-volted, one would think they'd be knowledgeable enough not to be that careless.

    This seems like you're really grasping at straws to find a "flaw"/complain about AMD.
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    JamesJones44 said:
    For gaming only the 7800x3d is the best choice. That's why I was a little surprised the came out with a 7900 and 7950 variant.
    I can see those other variants as people who game when they aren't working but still need a boat load of cores for their work.
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    I am actually quite surprised by how closely the AMD supplied benchmark results were to the results for the same games in the review.
    Reply