PC Components GPUs NVIDIA GeForceFX: Brute Force Attack Against the King Features By Lars Weinand published 27 January 2003 Comments (0) Page 20 of 30: Quality Benchmarks Page 1: Introduction Page 2: The GeForceFX GPU, Continued Page 3: The GeForceFX GPU, Continued Page 4: The Card Page 5: The Cooler Page 6: The Cooler, Continued Page 7: The Cooler, Continued Page 8: The Performance Page 9: Gaming Benchmarks Page 10: Unreal Tournament 2003 Botmatch Page 11: 3D Mark 2001 SE Page 12: Serious Sam 2 Z-Buffer Problems Page 13: Serious Sam 2 Z-Buffer Problems, Continued Page 14: Aquanox Page 15: Jedi Knight II Page 16: Max Payne Page 17: Comanche 4 Page 18: Codecreatures Page 19: 3D Application Benchmarks Page 20: Quality Benchmarks Page 21: Serious Sam 2 Page 22: 8x Anisotopic Page 23: Serious Sam 2 Page 24: 4x FSAA & 8x Anisotopic Page 25: Serious Sam 2 Page 26: Theoretical Benchmarks Page 27: Vertex Shader - Matrox Sharkmark Page 28: Fillrate Single Texturing Page 29: Vertex Shader Speed Page 30: Conclusion Quality Benchmarks4x FSAAUnreal Tournament 2003At lower resolutions, the GeForceFX is ahead, but at higher resolutions it loses its lead. At 1600x1200, the Radeon is slightly ahead.Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware NewsletterGet Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 … 30 Current page: Quality Benchmarks Prev Page 3D Application Benchmarks Next Page Serious Sam 2 TOPICS Workstation Nvidia ATI Benchmark Codec DirectX GeForce Hardware Radeon AMD See all comments (0) Lars Weinand No comments yet Comment from the forums
