Trump says Apple has agreed to 'build' chips with Intel — neither company confirms deal as Intel share price rockets
Via Truth Social.
President Donald Trump said on Thursday that Apple has agreed to work with Intel to “design and build” chips in the United States, posting the claim to Truth Social before either company confirmed any arrangement. Apple and Intel didn’t respond to initial requests for comment from Reuters, and neither has issued a statement acknowledging a finalized deal.
Trump says the deal is part of his administration’s push to reshore semiconductor manufacturing, writing that the U.S. needs to build its chips domestically and that he "decided to help Intel because we need to design and build our Chips right here in America.” He credited earlier government intervention for drawing Nvidia and Elon Musk's TeraFab project to Intel's foundry.
Apple already designs its own silicon and has done so since it dropped Intel processors from its products in 2020. Any arrangement here would purely be a foundry deal, with Intel acting as a contract manufacturer for chips Apple designs in-house. It wouldn’t return Apple to Intel-designed processors, and it certainly wouldn’t displace TSMC from Apple's flagship products.
The logic behind any such deal for Apple would be simple supply diversification; the company remains dependent on TSMC, whose leading-edge capacity is being absorbed by AI customers, including Nvidia and AMD. Placing a lower-volume part on a second source reduces single-foundry exposure without touching the iPhone and high-end M-series lines that rely on TSMC's most advanced nodes.
We’ve known about much of this for a little while now. Reporters caught wind of a preliminary deal last month, following discussions that ran for more than a year. Before that, analyst Ming-Chi Kuo and GF Securities outlined the likely scope: Apple's M7 SoC built on Intel's 18A-P process, powering the MacBook Air and entry-level iPad Pro, with mass production targeted for late 2027.
Those two product tiers accounted for roughly 20 million units in 2025, with annual shipments expected to settle between 15 million and 20 million — significant for a new foundry customer, but small enough to leave TSMC's revenue mix intact. Reporting has also suggested that Apple's A21 iPhone chips will move to Intel's 14A node around 2028, but none of this has been confirmed by Apple or Intel.
Trump's announcement comes just two days after Intel said its 18A-P process had entered risk production, announced at the VLSI Symposium in Honolulu. The node is the first performance-enhanced version of 18A, and Intel claims it delivers 9% higher performance at the same power, or 18% lower power at the same performance, while staying design-rule compatible with 18A so customers can reuse existing IP. CEO Lip-Bu Tan told investors last month that he expects multiple foundry commitments to close in the second half of 2026.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Intel has yet to confirm a single leading-edge customer for 18A, and any commitment from Apple would be a best-case scenario in terms of securing the validation the company both desperately wants and needs. The U.S. government holds a 10% stake in Intel, and its shares rose as much as 9% in premarket trading on the news, extending a run that has lifted the stock 464% over the past 12 months to a market cap of $608.7 billion.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
-
usertests ReplyBefore that, analyst Ming-Chi Kuo and GF Securities outlined the likely scope: Apple's M7 SoC built on Intel's 18A-P process, powering the MacBook Air and entry-level iPad Pro, with mass production targeted for late 2027.
That's an important chip. Can they get it from both foundries or do they have to toss one "low-end" thing (M7 die size should be relatively small) into the Intel bucket? -
alchemy69 "Trump says..." is usually a good indication that nothing of the kind ever happened.Reply -
TerryLaze Reply
He stole part of intel...it makes sense, even for trump, to force apple to give intel money since a part of that will be going towards the gov.alchemy69 said:"Trump says..." is usually a good indication that nothing of the kind ever happened. -
thestryker Reply
With Intel using industry standard tools these days it should be much easier to have a design which works on both with minimal modification. That being said I really think Apple would try to take advantage of BSPDN if their goal was seeing how Intel does since it's a fundamental advantage they bring to the table right now.usertests said:Can they get it from both foundries or do they have to toss one "low-end" thing (M7 die size should be relatively small) into the Intel bucket?
I'm still very concerned about Intel's fab capacity because of how much the buildouts have slowed. They have plenty of floor space, but I don't know what the EUV plan is due to the infinite backlog from ASML. I would like to think that this was accounted for last year, but I also wouldn't count on it. -
DS426 I would have to look back at the timing in history, but off-hand, couldn't we saw one thing that helped Intel start to fall was their loss of CPU business with Apple?Reply
Too big to fail as usual. I mean, would Apple go to Intel if there was no outside pressure? I'm sure they were looking at 18A in seriousness, but Apple needs VERY strong assurances on production numbers and timelines, something they'll happily pay for and have been getting with TSMC for many years now.
As @thestryker mentioned, it takes many years for new advanced and leading-edge fab to come online, not to mention mind-blowing CapEx costs. What is Intel's walk on making sure they have enough supply for 1st-party AI/DC first, Intel client compute 2nd, and then presumable others third? Hasn't Intel said themselves that they've been somewhat supply constrained from IFS in recent quarters? I don't see how AI-related CPU demand upticks releases any pressure, even if IFS has brought any new production (besides 18A) online. -
usertests Reply
You could say 14nm++++++++++++ missteps, 10nm misfire were the start, losing Apple was merely a symptom. Multiple years of no efficiency/graphics improvements made them a tough sell for Apple.DS426 said:I would have to look back at the timing in history, but off-hand, couldn't we saw one thing that helped Intel start to fall was their loss of CPU business with Apple?
I'm not sure the loss of Apple revenue has mattered as much as bleeding in the server market (attacked by AMD and ARM) and having to shovel lots of cash into Foundry.
I think Intel is getting back on track with some strong releases (Lunar Lake, Panther/Wildcat, Nova Lake) and if they don't have to spin off Foundry to do it, it will be a miracle.
I think there are lots of serious looks at Intel because of the current desperate AI situation. Pressure wasn't needed. Intel may have sufficiently proven 18A works with Panther Lake, with 18A-P and 14A actually reaching external customers.DS426 said:Too big to fail as usual. I mean, would Apple go to Intel if there was no outside pressure? I'm sure they were looking at 18A in seriousness, but Apple needs VERY strong assurances on production numbers and timelines, something they'll happily pay for and have been getting with TSMC for many years now. -
QuarterSwede So in a day or so after he and his cronies make a killing on the Intel stock raise, he’ll say something like, “I didn’t say Apple was building devices in America.” And he and his cronies will all make money on shorting the stock falling too. Typical disgusting Trump grift.Reply -
DS426 Reply
Agreed. One could probably rattle off a dozen or so missteps that all added up, Apple being one after they already saw Intel drifting while ARM was only becoming more and more competitive.usertests said:You could say 14nm++++++++++++ missteps, 10nm misfire were the start, losing Apple was merely a symptom. Multiple years of no efficiency/graphics improvements made them a tough sell for Apple.
I'm not sure the loss of Apple revenue has mattered as much as bleeding in the server market (attacked by AMD and ARM) and having to shovel lots of cash into Foundry.
I think Intel is getting back on track with some strong releases (Lunar Lake, Panther/Wildcat, Nova Lake) and if they don't have to spin off Foundry to do it, it will be a miracle.
I think there are lots of serious looks at Intel because of the current desperate AI situation. Pressure wasn't needed. Intel may have sufficiently proven 18A works with Panther Lake, with 18A-P and 14A actually reaching external customers.
Funny that it used to be that Apple was a priority customer for TSMC, as in could always get as much allocation on any node as they desired. nVidia is their darling gem now and even so, yes, logic and mem allocation competition is fierce.