Dell XPS 15 (9510) Review: Now With OLED

Not much else has changed, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Dell XPS 15 (9510)
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Dell XPS 15 (9510)'s OLED screen is bright and vivid, complimenting a laptop with strong performance and slim bezels. Thescreen upgrade does, however, shorten battery life.

Pros

  • +

    + Bright 16:10 OLED display

  • +

    + Slim bezels

  • +

    + Strong performance

  • +

    + Great adio

Cons

  • -

    Middling webcam

  • -

    Runs warm

  • -

    OLED shortens battery life

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

If we've learned anything about the best ultrabooks over the past few months, it's that it's hard to pass up something reliable with a nice screen. If you're going to be looking at it all day (and sometimes into the night), a quality display is important.

The Dell XPS 15 (9510) is the company’s latest revision of a semi-professional favorite. Perhaps the biggest change here, other than the latest Intel and Nvidia components, is the addition of an OLED screen. It starts at $1,349 with an 11th Gen Intel Core i5 and integrated graphics, while we tested it at $2,400.99 with a Core i7 and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti.

The XPS 15 still retains some professional trappings, including a full-sized SD card reader, but still hasn't changed much even after being redesigned last year. If OLED is what you want, and you’re after something a bit bigger than most ultraportables, this is one to consider.

Design

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Huydinhat
    khas hay
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    How many millimeters between the edge of the Bezel on each side and the first lit up pixel that you can see?

    Normally, Dell claims < 5mm.
    Reply
  • blppt
    Personally, I'm wondering if they've solved the problem of burn-in with OLED. For monitors this would seemingly be a huge problem.

    Although the new Escalade uses OLED for its instrument display, so something must have changed.
    Reply
  • PapaCrazy
    blppt said:
    Personally, I'm wondering if they've solved the problem of burn-in with OLED. For monitors this would seemingly be a huge problem.

    I'm wondering the same about Dell's wobbly trackpad issues.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    LG has said for years their panels last over 100,000 hours. If the OLED screen in this laptop lasts 15,000 hours before showing signs of burn in and/or uneven wear on the useful part of the screen (area above the taskbar and below the title bar which is where burn in and uneven wearing would show first), 15,000 hours at 8 hours a day is 1,875 days, or 5 years, which is basically the lifespan of a laptop used intensively.

    I still wouldn't trust it, as someone who doesn't make 6 figures a year. I can't wait until OLED becomes durable and mainstream enough to last 10 years on a computer display, even though IPS has made some great strides lately it still suffers in contrast ratio due to the nature of IPS, but the thought of having to babysit a screen and that the screen will burn itself out through normal use reminds me way too much of CCFL backlit LCD panel displays and the migraines they caused me as the CCFLs aged...
    Reply
  • satai
    Intel Core in such an expensive notebook? Is this some kind of a sick joke?

    In such a machine for such a money you need
    performance
    battery life
    coolnesso Intel should out of game for now.

    Why Dell does put this crap into its machines instr\ead of Ryzens?
    Reply
  • DSzymborski
    satai said:
    Intel Core in such an expensive notebook? Is this some kind of a sick joke?

    In such a machine for such a money you need
    performance
    battery life
    coolnesso Intel should out of game for now.

    Why Dell does put this crap into its machines instr\ead of Ryzens?

    An i7-11800H is perfectly competitive with the comparable Ryzen 7 5800H.

    In any case, we don't do AMD vs. Intel flame wars, so be substantive.
    Reply
  • blppt
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    I still wouldn't trust it, as someone who doesn't make 6 figures a year. I can't wait until OLED becomes durable and mainstream enough to last 10 years on a computer display, even though IPS has made some great strides lately it still suffers in contrast ratio due to the nature of IPS, but the thought of having to babysit a screen and that the screen will burn itself out through normal use reminds me way too much of CCFL backlit LCD panel displays and the migraines they caused me as the CCFLs aged...

    Agreed on IPS. I can't stand 'grey' blacks---theres also a reason that none of the top rated HDR TVs are IPS---they are absolutely awful at HDR.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    blppt said:
    Agreed on IPS. I can't stand 'grey' blacks---theres also a reason that none of the top rated HDR TVs are IPS---they are absolutely awful at HDR.

    As far as TVs go, go OLED if you want HDR, unless you do something stupid like watch CNN all day on it it'll last you long after 8K has become as mainstream as 4K is today.

    For a computer display and people who don't care about HDR currently because it's as rare as actual 4K content right now, give me 10-bit (or 8+2 bit) IPS any day over VA and PLS. You may not get the perfect black of OLED or 240hz refresh rate of TN, but they're a fraction of the price, have no color shifting, and look absolutely stellar.
    Reply
  • blppt
    I have an IPS 4k monitor right now, and yes, while its color accuracy is spectacular, it is absolutely terrible for dark scenes in video content or games. You don't get black; you get gray.

    I have yet to see a review on any IPS tv or monitor where its HDR performance is anywhere near acceptable---they simply cannot display anything close to true blacks.

    That being said, VA has its own issues (namely screen uniformity, which is why VA monitors (near field viewing) tend to be curved, not an issue with distance viewing TVs). But the only acceptable HDR computer monitors are either VA or OLED.
    Reply