Nvidia GTX 1650 Super Review: 1080p Gaming for $160

A solid 1080p performer

(Image credit: © Zotac)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Zotac GTX 1650 Super is able to reach 60 fps or more in many titles when running 1080p resolutions and is a good value at $160. It’s SFF-friendly at just over six inches long. We just wish its fans were quieter under load.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Small size

  • +

    Good performance per dollar

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    No ‘fan off’ capability

  • -

    Fans get loud under load

  • -

    4GB VRAM

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Nvidia’s Turing based lineup has matured over recent months and filled in performance gaps on the mid-range and high-end segments by adding the ‘Super’ branded cards. The new GPUs (RTX 2080 Super/RTX 2070 Super/RTX 2060 Super) hit the market with better performance than their predecessors and a lower price. More recently, the budget end has received the same attention with the recent release of the GTX 1660 Super and the GTX 1650 Super we have in our hands today.

The GTX 1650 Super fits into Nvidia’s product stack above the GTX 1650 and below the GTX 1660. With a huge performance gap and a price difference of about $70, there was ample room to add a card without blurring the lines between products. And for consumers, getting a notably faster card option for a $10 price increase over the launch price of the GTX 1650 feels like a worthy upgrade option.

Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • Mileta Cekovic
    It would be interesting to see how Radeon RX 5500 and especially RX 5500 XT fare against RTX 1650 Super and what the prices of them will be.
    With RTX 1650 Super @ $160, Nvidia has given AMD a serious task to beat this price/performance level.
    Reply
  • King_V
    This, I think, has definitely put AMD on notice. A little hard to say for certain, and I wish the RX 570 4GB and RX 580 8GB results were on the charts as well, but, depending on the game, it looks like the 1650 Super is at least equal to the RX 570, and sometimes matches the RX 590.

    Given the $160 price point, it seems the RX 570, 580, and 590 are going to have to adjust prices downward.

    Further, I'm thinking that AMD is not going to be able to get by with only matching the RX 580's performance with the RX 5500. Or, if they do, they will have to definitely undercut the 1650 Super's price, which will put even further downward pressure on the Polaris cards.

    On the other hand, I don't know what to think about the RX 5500 - at one point it was stated to be a 150W card, then it was 110W. What little performance data we have, and it's precious little data, pegs it at around RX 580 performance. I'm hoping this is all a case of AMD holding their cards close to their chest, but, as it stands, that's not overly promising, given what the 1650 Super offers in performance... and AMD should worry.
    Reply
  • BlissfulGamer
    It's a great card however the fans on this model are insanely loud under load.
    Reply