Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Signin with

Choosing The Right Power Supply

by

A cheap power supply isn't a good place to try to save money, although it's often the first place less experienced builders will try to go cheap. As a general rule, you want a well-built power supply that conforms to modern technical standards, and you can expect to spend at least $40 on it. Decent PSUs priced under $30 simply do not exist. Keep your eye out for the following safety-oriented features:

Abbreviation
Feature
Requirement
OVPOver-Voltage ProtectionRequired
UVP Under-Voltage ProtectionRequired
OCPOver-Current ProtectionRequired
OPP Over-Power Protection Optional
OTP Over-Temperature Protection Optional
SCPShort Circuit ProtectionRequired
NLONo Load OperationOptional


PSU Wattage

The capacity of your power supply really depends on the components going into your PC. Our basic build, without discrete graphics, would easily be fine with a 250 W PSU. If we add a budget-friendly graphics card priced under $100, 300 to 350 W are plenty. However, if you jump on Ebay and grab a former flagship priced inexpensively, you'll probably want something able to sustain 350 or 400 W.

Now, those numbers represent current from the 12 V rail. To be safe, we recommend a 450 to 500 W power supply. And stay away from cheap PSUs that emphasize less-taxed 3.3 and 5 V rails.

Let’s have a look at our two builds and their power requirements. In the chart above, we have the build designed for basic productivity, without discrete graphics. The chart below represents the more advanced configuration, sporting an add-in graphics card.

Manufacturers have managed to reduce the power draw of their components at idle over the years. So, the difference between idle and load power is greater now than ever before. Since a PSU’s efficiency drops off dramatically below roughly 20 percent of its maximum current, it makes no sense to use a power supply able to supply more wattage than a system will ever need. You'd only want to buy a higher-capacity PSU if you're using (or planning to use) a higher-end graphics card, for example.

500 W tops; none of these systems need more than that


Without Discrete Graphics
With Discrete Graphics Up To 100 W TDP
With Discrete Graphics Up To 200 W TDP
PSU Recommendation
300 W (80+)
350 W (80+)
450-500 W (80+)
Price
$40
$40
$41


Bottom Line

You can get a decent, reliable power supply for about $40. It’s important to check that it has all of the safety features we mentioned above and, in case you want to use an older graphics card, all the necessary connectors (like auxilary PCIe power cables). Also, it’s always a good idea to read power supply reviews first; that could save you a lot of trouble down the road.

Now, we need an enclosure in which to put our hardware. So, cases come next.

Share:
126
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
velocityg4 07/11/2012 4:30 AM
Hide
-20+

Interesting, but I'm assuming most parents that build there own computers, game and read toms hardware would be better suited just giving their kids their old gaming PC's. Since many this enthusiastic will already be replacing them every couple of years. Now they have another excuse to replace them and their kids get computers made from former high end and quality parts that are still very fast and more than capable of playing any kids games and edutacational/edutainment software.

Although I say just give them an Apple IIe so they can learn on what we learned on in school.

s3anister 07/11/2012 4:51 AM
Hide
-20+

velocityg4 :
Interesting, but I'm assuming most parents that build there own computers, game and read toms hardware would be better suited just giving their kids their old gaming PC's.


I see the reasoning in this, however, for someone like myself I found this an interesting article; as I'm actually about to build a computer for my nieces and they do not need a fully featured gaming rig. It doesn't make sense to give them a machine that doesn't suit their needs and I'm sure many other parents/uncles/aunts are in the same boat.

JOSHSKORN 07/11/2012 5:44 AM
Show
belardo 07/11/2012 6:05 AM
Show
Maximus_Delta 07/11/2012 6:20 AM
Hide
-17+

iCrap (something for the fashion victims & super creative types to show off whilst sipping their skinny lattes in starbucks whilst facebooking their friends about the fact that are in starbucks, having lattes, and got a new iPad / macbook)

belardo 07/11/2012 6:23 AM
Hide
-13+

What *YOU* do is hand your kid the OLD computer when you upgrade. But yeah, since about the age of 1 and a half, my son has had his own PC... keeps if off ours. He did damage his CRT monitor with paint - which was somewhat cleaned up. Fine. His first was a client's out-dated Pentium III-1Ghz which he paid $2500 when it was NEW. Then he got a compaq handme down from mom.

Today, age 7: AMD X4 CPU, 4GB RAM, ATI 4670 card I built from various parts. I use it for background work since its so powerful. He does his educational and game software on it.

When I was age 7, the Apple II was just released and most people didn't know what one was. It wasn't until 1980 that we started seeing these $1200~3000 computers... usually in the school library with 1 or 2 units. My 1985 PC: 1-2Mhz 128k RAM, 360k floppy drive system with a monitor was $900+. I still have it and it works. I forgot how to use it.

Suggestions when building a PC for 3~8 year olds: buy a logitech notebook mouse ($15~20) as these are smaller but perfect for little hands. Use a cheap keyboard as kids tend to be messy and destroy them. if they are real young (1~3yrs old) try to get your hands on a CRT. Harder to knock over, costs $0~5 if you can find one.

Also, a $200~250 netbook makes a good "notebook" for young kids (4~9 years old). Or give your kid your old notebook. My kid was given a 17" notebook a friend gave away when he upgraded.

acerace 07/11/2012 6:23 AM
Hide
-14+

Quote :

So show me a top of the line Android tablet that costs less than the "overpriced" iPad...




You're feeding the troll, genius. :heink:

JohnnyLucky 07/11/2012 6:41 AM
Hide
-2+

Leave out the bling and dedicated video card for a basic pc for grandma and grandpa! I've already built a couple for senior citizens who are not gamers.

BTW - there is an option to dedicate some of the memory to the integrated graphics. I installed inexpensive 8GB memory and dedicated 2GB to the graphics. What I don't know is if it makes a real difference. Would that help gamers?

amdfangirl 07/11/2012 6:58 AM
Hide
-1+

JohnnyLucky :
Leave out the bling and dedicated video card for a basic pc for grandma and grandpa! I've already built a couple for senior citizens who are not gamers. BTW - there is an option to dedicate some of the memory to the integrated graphics. I installed inexpensive 8GB memory and dedicated 2GB to the graphics. What I don't know is if it makes a real difference. Would that help gamers?


More or less dependant on the speed of the RAM.

Proximon 07/11/2012 7:11 AM
Hide
-2+

After all that build up a cheap PSU is used based entirely on claims written on the box. No reviews exist and apparently Cooler Master knows it's junk because they haven't bothered to get it certified by 80plus.

bliq00 07/11/2012 7:15 AM
Hide
-20+

why didn't the author post the stock cooling solution temps. Personally I've always found that the stock intel cooling was both quiet and sufficient, even in mini itx cases. I'm curious how big the difference is. if the diff is just 10-15%, I don't think it's worth spending extra on a 3rd party cooler for a kids computer.

amdfangirl 07/11/2012 7:15 AM
Hide
-4+

Quote :

After all that build up a cheap PSU is used based entirely on claims written on the box. No reviews exist and apparently Cooler Master knows it's junk because they haven't bothered to get it certified by 80plus.




I'd just go with the Antec Earthwatts series.

killeeeeer 07/11/2012 7:49 AM
Hide
-3+

Its funny how its PC for kids and they benchmarked Gta IV, the 3850 seems the way to go better than buying and i3 or g someing and buying like GT520 as the 3850 beats the 520 in benchmarks

FormatC 07/11/2012 8:01 AM
Hide
-0+

The GT 520 is slower than A8-3850. Take a look at the Charts 2011 :)

killeeeeer 07/11/2012 8:03 AM
Hide
-4+

FormatC :
The GT 520 is slower than A8-3850. Take a look at the Charts 2011

"as the 3850 beats the 520 in benchmarks " read carefully

FormatC 07/11/2012 8:15 AM
Show
de5_Roy 07/11/2012 8:24 AM
Hide
-3+

nice read. :)
interesting choice, benching gta iv for a kid's pc...lol i know it was to test platform strength.. i hope it wasn't in the pc when it was handed to him. 7750 was a very good choice.
some people might argue why the amd apus were not overclocked so that they could outperform pentiums for gaming and the apus' higher performance in 3d rendering and pov ray tracing.. :D
i am a bit skeptical about cm gx psu... overall good performance for money from both intel and amd builds.

emad_ramlawi 07/11/2012 8:25 AM
Show
FormatC 07/11/2012 8:31 AM
Hide
-9+

Quote :

This is Cooler Master advertisement ...
Tough Times huh Tom ...




No, this is what I had on matching components in my lab here, because we have recently tested these parts. This is a so-called recycling :D

Best offers

All about Desktops

Newsletters


OK