Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Review: Mainstream Ada Arrives

Roughly matching the RTX 3080 for $100 less and with DLSS 3.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Founders Edition
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

To say that the RTX 4070 Ti was poorly received at launch would be an understatement. It wasn't a terrible card, but people hoped for a lot lower pricing on the 4070 Ti. Unlike some of the other GPUs, it has basically been in stock since launch day at MSRP. With the RTX 4070, Nvidia seems to be getting the message from gamers that $800 or more is too much. With inflation issues and a downward spiraling economy, a lot of people are looking to save money rather than blowing it on a graphics card upgrade.

Dropping the entry price of the RTX 40-series down to $599 with the RTX 4070 helps, no doubt, though it's still a $100 increase over the previous-gen RTX 3070. Then again, inflation isn't just hitting individuals, so increasing the generational price by 20% after two and a half years might be justifiable. Maybe. If not, kick back and wait for the other 40-series GPUs to arrive, or AMD's lower-tier RX 7000-series parts.

Compared to the previous-gen parts, the RTX 4070 ends up trading blows with the RTX 3080 across our test suite. There are times when it's 5–10 percent faster, and other instances where it's 5–10 percent slower. Of course, that's not counting DLSS 3, which can boost performance by another 30% or more. But as we've said many times, DLSS 3's Frame Generation doesn't directly translate into universally better performance. It can smooth out visuals, but it adds latency and still needs a decent base level of performance before it's acceptable.

The most impressive aspect of the RTX 4070 isn't the performance or the price, but rather the efficiency. Even though it's not clearly superior to an RTX 3080, it's close enough that we'd give it the edge. The fact that it needs 120W less power to reach the same level of performance is just the cherry on top.

Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • peterf28
    I skip this generation. 16GB is minimum nowadays.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    If there were no previous gen high-end GPUs available this would be a good buy but at this price you can just buy a new AIB 6950XT.
    Reply
  • PlaneInTheSky
    So it offers similar performance to the 3080 and launches at an only slightly lower MSRP.

    Going by price leaks of some AIB, we will be lucky if we're not going backwards in price / performance.

    In 2 years time since the 3080, performance per $ has barely increased.

    The 12GB VRAM is depressing too, considering a RX 6950XT offers 16GB for the same price.

    DLSS 3.0 doesn't interest me in the slightest since it's just glorified frame interpolation that does nothing to help responsiveness, it actually adds lag.

    It's hard to get excited about PC Gaming when it is in such a terrible state.
    Reply
  • PlaneInTheSky
    In Europe, price/performance of Nvidia GPU generation-generation has basically flatlined now.

    3080 MSRP: €699
    4070 MSRP: €669

    That's the state PC gaming is in now. In 2 years time, no improvement in price/performance.

    It is a good example of what happens in a duopoly market without competition.
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    PlaneInTheSky said:
    In 2 years time since the 3080, performance per $ has barely increased.
    That's really sad, how many gold plated leather jackets does jensen really need?
    Reply
  • DSzymborski
    The 4070 is releasing at a significantly lower price than the 3080. $699 in September 2020 is $810 in March 2023 dollars. $200 over the 4070 MSRP of $599 is a significant amount. Now, few 4070s will be available at $599, but then few 3080s were actually available at $699 (which, again, is $810 in current dollars).

    The 3070 was released at an MSRP of $499, which is $578 in March 2023 dollars.
    Reply
  • Exphius_Mortum
    Title of the article needs a little adjustment, it should read as follows
    Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Review: Mainstream Ada Arrives at Enthusiast Pricing
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    @JarredWaltonGPU thanks for the review, I saw that you retested all the GPUs with recent drivers which must have taken a huge effort (y)
    PS: Are you planning to add or replace some older titles with new games for future benchmarks?
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Hey look, a 1.65% performance improvement per 1% more money card when compared to the 3070. It's disappointing that's where we are at with gpus these days
    Reply
  • healthy Pro-teen
    PlaneInTheSky said:
    In Europe, price/performance of Nvidia GPU generation-generation has basically flatlined now.

    3080 MSRP: €699
    4070 MSRP: €669

    That's the state PC gaming is in now. In 2 years time, no improvement in price/performance.

    It is a good example of what happens in a duopoly market without competition.
    A duopoly at best, it's almost a monopoly. AMD will probably undercut it by a small amount, get middling reviews and then heavily discount the GPU only when most people have already decided on the 4070. 6950XT is discounted right now and offers better value and the average gamer doesn't know it, so 4070 will sell regardless.
    Reply