System Builder Marathon, March 2011: $500 Gaming PC
Deals
published
Benchmark Results: Productivity
Stock or overclocked, the current quad-core configuration smokes December’s triple-core processor in our 3ds Max rendering benchmark.
Three high-clocked Propus cores hang close in 7-Zip, but are completely outclassed by the quad-core Deneb CPU in WinRAR compression. WinRAR is one application known to benefit from the Phenom II’s L3 cache.
Photoshop also rewards us for a smart CPU upgrade, making it a clean sweep in favor of the current PC in our productivity suite.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Productivity
Prev Page Benchmark Results: Audio/Video Next Page Benchmark Results: SyntheticsStay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
More about gaming pcs
TOPICS
98 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
LuckyDucky7 "I’ll certainly entertain the possibility of Intel’s newly-available Core i3-2100 for the next SBM."Reply
Have fun overclocking that rig!
I'd choose my O/C'd i3-530 @ 3.75 GHz (stock, air-cooled) over any of the new Sandy Bridge offerings any day.
The 2100 just cannot compete with that- it's marginally better than a first-gen i3, and it cannot be pushed harder.
*Hopes Bulldozer will be ready by that time* -
haplo602 now finaly a low SBM build I like.Reply
++ on the PSU (finaly not a 500W+ waste)
+ on the case (looks decent) -
lunyone Pretty good build for the $. I would've gone with the Athlon x4 or x3 to keep things under budget, but that is just me. There are plenty of GPU options in the ~$170 price range. I think you might've got one of "those" GPU's that you read about. This is why "expecting" OC'ing abilities with whatever part you buy, shouldn't be taken for granted. Buy what you can afford and if you get a good OC on your parts, feel blessed:)Reply -
lunyone I would've taken the savings on the CPU and bought better RAM or maybe even a different case, but that is just nit picking a bit :)Reply -
one-shot Would someone please explain the point of comparing the old SBM to the new one if there isn't a list of the parts from the SBM done in the past? These have always been annoying when the reader is forced to look back to December for a detailed list of parts. This has been practiced for years here. It makes no sense comparing to something the reader has no idea as to the parts being used in the past. Seriously....Reply
Edit: Why Did I get a Minus one the second after my post was submitted?