Best Hard Drives 2026 — The best HDDs for desktop PCs, NAS, and more, based on our extensive benchmarking
Based on our extensive benchmarks, these are the best hard drives for every need and budget.
Mechanical hard drives might seem like ancient technology, but there are still many places where they provide 'good enough' performance, and they easily offer the most amount of storage for the price. These devices still store the lion's share of data around the world, but recent demand spikes driven by AI data centers have put us firmly in the midst of shortages, and now prices are exponentially higher than normal. That makes finding a reasonably-priced hard drive all the more difficult, but we've compiled the list below to help you navigate the crisis and find the best deals possible. Our recommendations are based on in-depth benchmarking and our extensive library of reviews, ensuring you can make the best purchasing decision possible.
You do not always need the fast access that the best SSDs are designed to provide, and an HDD's sequential performance is plenty for streaming and other tasks. There are still a lot of hard drives to choose from, so we’ve tested multiple drives in our labs to help make sure you pick the right one for your needs.
While the best SSDs will give you the best experience for your operating system and boot drive, and also offer much better application and game loading times than HDDs, they are still significantly more expensive per terabyte of storage space. However, NVMe SSDs have also experienced a tremendous pricing upswing, now costing far more than ever before. They also have a practical capacity limit per device, and motherboards have limited M.2 slots. Meanwhile, HDDs are already at 32TB and are planned to hit 50TB and beyond, with 120TB on the horizon, and work with legacy SATA ports.
Best Hard Drives in 2026 at a glance (more info below):
| Header Cell - Column 0 | Best HDD |
Alternate |
|---|---|---|
Best High-End Desktop Hard Drive |
Row 0 - Cell 2 | |
Best Budget Hard Drive |
||
Best NAS Hard Drive |
||
Best Enterprise Hard Drive |
Here's the shortlist of our best HDD rankings below, but we have deeper breakdowns for these drives below, along with more picks for other categories. We also have shopping tips further below.
Best Hard Drive You Can Buy in 2026
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
The Toshiba X300 Pro replaces the Seagate BarraCuda Pro in this category, as the latter has become harder to find. This works out okay because the X300 Pro has respectable performance, particularly at 12TB, which is a reasonable capacity for a desktop drive. It has 512MB of cache at this capacity, and the warranty is a full five years. Performance in some areas, like gaming, is less great, but desktop HDDs today are more often used as cold storage. For that, it performs well and is not a budget-class drive.
Read: Toshiba X300 Pro HDD Review
Best High-Capacity Desktop Hard Drive
2. WD Black 8TB HDD
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
The WD Black is and has been an extremely popular, high-performance hard drive. It’s an easy way to get guaranteed top performance with a 7200-RPM spindle speed. At 4TB and up, 256MB of DRAM cache is an option that can help elevate it further over the competing WD Blue HDD. The Black's performance as a whole is higher, and the warranty is much better at five years instead of two.
The WD Black’s biggest drawback, aside from potentially being noisier, is its price. The 8TB Black is significantly more expensive than the 8TB Blue. It’s worth jumping up if you want the very best performance, and it’s also probably worth paying more for the longer warranty period. To save some money, you can go with the 128MB cache version.
Read: Western Digital 8TB Black HDD Review: Not Back in Black
Best Budget Hard Drive in 2026
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
We weren’t fans of the Seagate BarraCuda in our original review, but that’s because this drive is very different at lower capacities that use the performance-killing SMR technology and a slower spindle speed. At higher capacities of 16TB+, it switches from SMR to CMR, 5400 to 7200 RPM, and 256MB to 512MB cache, so it’s much closer to the original BarraCuda Pro. That makes it a much more compelling drive, especially when taken into consideration with the current pricing environment.
The transfer rate isn’t as fast as other higher-capacity hard drives, and the warranty is only two years in duration, like the X300 Pro. On the other hand, it matches up well against the better WD Blues but offers a higher capacity ceiling, which could be appealing even if the absolute price is higher.
Read: Seagate BarraCuda Review
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
If you need a larger drive and/or are looking for higher performance without the cost, the 10TB/12TB WD Blue HDD SKUs are available with a 7,200 RPM speed and a large 512MB DRAM cache. We previously recommended the excellent Seagate FireCuda at this capacity, but it can be difficult to find for a reasonable price. Dollars per terabyte is the metric to use, but sometimes you don’t want a 20TB+ drive for your home system. That’s where the CMR-based Blue comes in, as it has a lower entry point while delivering everything you expect from an HDD. It’s a good pick as a drive for your backups and media files if you don’t want to spring for an SSD – consider it a WD Black “lite.”
There are some downsides, though. You can get larger drives with the same or better performance at or below the price per terabyte of the 12TB Blue if you have the money to spare. Those drives also tend to have superior warranties compared to the Blue, as they are designed for NAS and enterprise workloads; however, it may be possible to obtain an extended warranty through other means. The Blue is sufficient for use in recording, content creation, AI, and so on, but you may also want a higher level of reliability than it promises for important data. In general, though, it’s a good drive pick for home use, and is a step up over the 5,640 RPM SKUs with smaller caches.
Read: WD Blue 8TB HDD Review
Best NAS Hard Drive in 2026
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
The Seagate IronWolf Pro is a strong performer posting faster speeds than the competing WD Red Pro in many of our tests. We like Seagate’s three-year data recovery services as they report a high record of success, and data recovery is traditionally very expensive.
The IronWolf Pro has larger caches for many of its models with the same storage capacity, including 24TB, and also a corresponding workload rating increase from 300 to 550 TB/year.
Read: Seagate IronWolf Pro Review
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
The 22TB Red Pro NAS HDD is a worthy alternative drive for NAS usage. It has strong performance in random workloads thanks to the 7200 RPM spindle speed, and it also comes with 512MB of DRAM cache for the 14TB and larger models. This is backed by a five-year warranty, although the 300 TB/yr workload rating is merely average.
This hard drive has very similar specifications and pricing as the Seagate IronWolf Pro, which has the advantage of a slightly higher maximum sustained write speed and Seagate’s three-year rescue plan. The Red Pro has a larger DRAM cache, though, and its OptiNAND technology gave better 4KB results, so it's better for workloads that have small I/O.
Read: WD Red Pro HDD Review
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
This drive has claimed its spot with good reason. The version we reviewed was good enough but had 256MB of cache and a less competitive price. Current versions are less expensive compared to their peers and can have 512MB of cache. The rest remains good: a full 7,200 RPM drive with CMR technology, which is superior to 5,400 RPM and SMR for NAS. The drive is also relatively quiet and efficient, which is a positive in this role. Its main downside is the shorter three-year warranty, although if you’re looking for a less expensive, smaller NAS drive, it’s a worthwhile trade.
Read: WD Red Plus 12TB HDD Review
Best Enterprise Hard Drive in 2026
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
The new Seagate Exos M is the successor to the Exos series. The M stands for Mosaic, which is the HAMR technology Seagate has refined to get this level of storage density with 3TB+ platters. Seagate has worked to keep power consumption down with equal or better performance using other techniques, including multiple idle power states. The drive as tested is up to 30TB with CMR technology at 7,200 RPM, which means it is high-performance. Larger CMR drives are possible in this line, but for now, the 32TB and 36TB offerings are SMR, which have performance caveats.
It’s difficult to name a better enterprise HDD on the market simply because Seagate is the first one to reach these capacities. If you absolutely need the most space per drive/volume, then your decision is currently made easy. If your workloads lean more towards NAS, Seagate has the same hardware in the IronWolf Pro, which now goes up to 30TB. That remains the best NAS drive. In both cases, it makes the most sense to buy these in multiple units, which makes the raw cost prohibitive for most home users and even some small businesses. In those cases, we can still recommend the smaller capacity IronWolf Pro and the older Exos series, or the WD Gold and Red Pro.
Read: Seagate Exos M 30TB HDD Review
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
The WD Gold line is WD’s “gold standard” for HDDs, intended to offer the best performance and reliability for enterprise. It shares many characteristics with the WD Purple Pro, made for surveillance, and the WD Red Pro, made for NAS, but has a higher sustained transfer rate and also the ArmorCache feature at 22TB and up. Compared to Seagate’s IronWolf Pro and Exos lines, the WD Gold has OptiNAND technology like its above siblings. This enables higher capacities but can also improve performance due to metadata being stored in fast, non-volatile iNAND flash. WD also backs the Gold with a full warranty and software support.
Where the 24TB Gold in particular stands out is with its ArmorCache technology. This technology uses some of the flash memory to safely store data from DRAM in case of an unexpected power loss event. This can protect user data when the write cache is enabled (WCE) for full performance, writing out with help from rotational momentum. When the cache (WCD) is disabled, a policy used to guarantee data integrity, the Gold improves random write performance especially with larger transfer lengths, up to WCE levels. The Gold is perfect for multi-drive and RAID environments but is held back by its price if you don’t need that feature.
Read: WD Gold 24TB HDD Review
Best Lower-Capacity (or Budget) Enterprise Hard Drive
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
These older Exos drives can be a great option if you’re trying to navigate the current very expensive storage situation. You’re getting older technology, which means lower capacities, but that also means you can invest less money into the solution. The performance on these drives is still quite good, and the warranty is solid. The biggest issue is having worse data density, but this might not be an issue for many home labbers. They also have 256MB rather than 512MB of cache, which can reduce performance in some cases, but this is an acceptable trade-off almost always.
Read: Seagate Exos X20 Review
Best Surveillance and NVR Hard Drive in 2026
Specifications
Reasons to buy
Reasons to avoid
The Seagate SkyHawk AI HDD is designed with “AI” firmware to improve the drive’s ability to handle recording, video analysis, and GPU analytics workloads. This includes up to 64 HD video streams and 32 AI streams with zero dropped frames. This is combined with a robust warranty, including a high workload rate and Seagate’s three-year data recovery service.
This makes it a great pick for surveillance and NVR work, but WD’s Purple Pro is quite similar at this capacity. While these drives are comparable, we give the nod to the SkyHawk AI because of Seagate’s Rescue Services plan. This seems to be a particularly worthwhile feature for the expected use cases.
Read: Seagate SkyHawk AI 20TB HDD Review
Quick Shopping Tips
It is important to be aware of the drive’s form factor, with 3.5” being the most common for the best HDDs (this is the only type we cover). If you need 2.5”, your options are more limited, especially for capacity. Otherwise, your computer case’s ability to house a certain number of 3.5” drives might be your primary limitation.
The ubiquitous SATA interface is used for desktop PCs, and most motherboards have ample available ports, which makes expansion easy. If you're shopping for an HDD, you’re probably looking for the lowest possible cost per TB, but you should consider performance and support for certain applications. There are a few potential performance pitfalls when buying a new HDD, and the type of recording technology is one of the most important factors. We only recommend conventional magnetic recording (CMR) drives and not shingled (SMR), as the latter comes with performance and operational caveats.
For performance, HDDs are also often gauged by rotations per minute (RPM), which is usually a direct indicator of performance (though not the only indicator). The RPM value impacts sequential transfers as well as random access latency. Lower RPM drives tend to be quieter and more efficient, while higher RPM drives have better performance. There are also variable RPM drives that try to achieve the best of both worlds. Power draw, heat, and noise are factors related to performance.
HDDs additionally have an amount of DRAM to help temporarily cache data. This amount of cache generally scales with the capacity of the drive. More cache is, of course, better, but if it comes as a trade-off — for example, instead of having a support service — then you should consider your priorities carefully when making a purchase.
When choosing one of the best HDDs, you should balance these factors with your intended usage and, of course, around your budget. You will want specialized drives for NAS, surveillance/DVR/NVR, raw storage for media and backups, or for heavier workloads. Certain drives will offer a better bang for the buck if you just want the extra capacity, or you may require a lower RPM drive to avoid the noise of faster drives. See our list below for more details.
Benchmarks / How We Tested
We utilize a variety of benchmarks to fully test an HDD and characterize its performance and consistency. HDDs are still relatively popular for holding game libraries, particularly as games continue to get larger. While this means longer loading times than you get with SSDs, it can be useful to prevent having to redownload large games, and HDDs are also fine for temporarily putting games “on ice” as you cycle through other titles. Our 3DMark benchmarks give us an idea of gaming performance, although it’s best to go with an SSD for multiplayer and regularly-accessed games.
PCMark 10, which is related to 3DMark, focuses on measuring performance in productivity and standard desktop PC applications. While you don’t want to run big applications off of hard drives, there are many cases where HDDs must be used, particularly with content creation. HDDs also make for good “cold” storage as an archival backup, especially for larger source files that may have less or no compression. HDDs are also popular for recording gameplay as they have enough speed to keep up with even decent bitrates.
The most common use for hard drives, though, is simple file transfers. Our DiskBench test estimates transfer performance with a real-world workload that is useful for calculating how long a transfer could take. Hard drives have consistent performance and will hit their maximum sustained speed at QD1 with large enough I/O, which is illustrated in our ATTO benchmark results. This is particularly useful for showing differences in technology and capacity as drives get bigger and faster.
Crystal Disk Mark also demonstrates this with its sequential performance results but also at a higher queue depth if you’re doing multiple transfers at once. For maximum sustained write performance, we show write saturation characteristics as well. Crystal Disk Mark further reveals 4KB performance which is latency-intensive, a result impacted by RPM and other drive characteristics, although HDDs are generally quite slow with such small I/O.
We also test power consumption and temperature. Power consumption will vary with drive performance, RPM, and more, and it’s important to look at four different cases: maximum power draw, average power draw, idle power draw, and workload efficiency. Power usage can add up with multiple drives. Temperature is also an important metric for hard drives, as overheating is a common cause of failure, particularly during sustained workloads.
Best gaming laptop deals | Best monitor deals | Best PC and laptop deals | Best SSD deals | Best CPU deals | Gaming Chair | Best hard drive deals | Best PC case deals | Best Dell and Alienware deals | Best 3D printer deals | Best PC peripherals deals | Best motherboard deals | Best CPU cooler deals
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.
- Shane Downing Contributing Writer
-
ajtatum Honestly, I can't believe you don't consider the Toshiba N300 HDD as the best for NAS devices. According to HDD reports, they have a much lower failure rate than WD Red drives and a bit lower than Seagate. Additionally, Toshiba N300 drives typically have more cache than either Seagate or WD Red. They have a higher TBW test and an awesome warranty. I've had WD Red drives fail me so much in the past that I don't even consider them, and the sentiment is the same with many NAS websites like NAS Compares. Seagate is just more widely known and have more marketing dollars to make people believe their drives are superior, whereas Toshiba doesn't need to do the marketing as anyone who's done their research would be able to see that Toshiba N300 drives are high quality, last long, and are less expensive than Seagate.Reply -
Uberwolf My experience over 40 years has been, between the typical, WD and Seagate I have had about the same issues, with Seagate being a tad more reliable and expansions disks(USB) being the least reliable. Have had minimal experience with Toshiba.Reply -
nerevah So when crypto was hot and everybody was farming, I gave it a shot at farming Chia (a crypto currency that needed HDDs to farm).Reply
Out of my 20 WD and 18 Seagate HDDs, 5 of the Seagate HDDs broke in less than a year, with no WD HDDs failing until now (3 years later).
Seagate also refused to honor the warranty on their HDDs as they were shucked from external USB enclosures. They eventually gave in and replaced 3 of their HDDs after threatening them with legal actions.
NEVER SEAGATE AGAIN!
PS: I sold all the Seagate HDDs and the WD ones are still working without any problem in my NAS. -
breezeman This list makes little to no sense when looking at the pros and cons of allof the drives. You list WD Blacks 256mb cache as an advantqage but then list Seagates Exos line 256mb cache as a disadvantage. The Exos has a sustained write of 260mbs, so does the wd black but you havent mentioned that either. Also in the description section of the Exos drives you say that the drives dont reach 22TB when they definatly do. I have 4x 22TB 22x Exos drives running as we speak. In my experience the Exos line is far an away more reliable than the WD Black.Reply
This list is not helpful, misleading and shotty in its research of the available hardware. I hope that anyone reading the article scrolls down to the comments to see what others and I have mentioned. Do better, this is a garbage post. -
TheBeastFromOz Reply
I've had a total of two HDD fail in the last 10 years, both WD Red drives. One of them, a 10TB, was only 3 years old and had just been used to store my movie collection. It started to fail, so I quickly replaced it with a Seagate, never had a failure of those, although I do tend to retire my drives at 10 years/50,000 hours, whichever happens first. The WD Reds are total crap, in my limited experience, and glad to see others have found the same. Never seen the Toshiba drives for sale here in Oz, the few suppliers that list them have them as out of stock, so assume they are no longer available here.ajtatum said:Honestly, I can't believe you don't consider the Toshiba N300 HDD as the best for NAS devices. According to HDD reports, they have a much lower failure rate than WD Red drives and a bit lower than Seagate. Additionally, Toshiba N300 drives typically have more cache than either Seagate or WD Red. They have a higher TBW test and an awesome warranty. I've had WD Red drives fail me so much in the past that I don't even consider them, and the sentiment is the same with many NAS websites like NAS Compares. Seagate is just more widely known and have more marketing dollars to make people believe their drives are superior, whereas Toshiba doesn't need to do the marketing as anyone who's done their research would be able to see that Toshiba N300 drives are high quality, last long, and are less expensive than Seagate. -
SomeoneElse23 Reply
Any drive with less than 5 year warranty isn't worth my time.TheBeastFromOz said:I've had a total of two HDD fail in the last 10 years, both WD Red drives. One of them, a 10TB, was only 3 years old and had just been used to store my movie collection. It started to fail, so I quickly replaced it with a Seagate, never had a failure of those, although I do tend to retire my drives at 10 years/50,000 hours, whichever happens first. The WD Reds are total crap, in my limited experience, and glad to see others have found the same. Never seen the Toshiba drives for sale here in Oz, the few suppliers that list them have them as out of stock, so assume they are no longer available here. -
Trevor Dennis My main worry with HDDs is reliability. I have had several fail over the years, but never an SSD, NVMe drive. 24TB is a lot of data to back up! So I'd be looking for data on how long a particular drive is going to last.Reply -
USAFRet Reply
Drives die.Trevor Dennis said:My main worry with HDDs is reliability. I have had several fail over the years, but never an SSD, NVMe drive. 24TB is a lot of data to back up! So I'd be looking for data on how long a particular drive is going to last.
Be it HDD, SSD, whatever....
I've personally had both die.
The only thing you should be doing is a good backup routine.
Keeping data on a single device, no matter what type, is foolish.