Intel Going Deeper With Two New RealSense Depth Cameras

 RealSense Camera F200
(Image credit: Intel)
3

A couple of years ago, Intel brought us the RealSense Camera F200, its first short-range depth-sensing camera. Since then, RealSense has come a long way; the F200 found its way into a handful of notebooks and all-in-ones. Depth and motion detection lead to many useful applications, such as creating virtual green screens and replacing passwords with facial recognition.

Intel's RealSense R200 Depth-Perceiving Camera In A 2-In-1 System (Image credit: Intel)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Tom's Hardware is the leading destination for hardcore computer enthusiasts. We cover everything from processors to 3D printers, single-board computers, SSDs and high-end gaming rigs, empowering readers to make the most of the tech they love, keep up on the latest developments and buy the right gear. Our staff has more than 100 years of combined experience covering news, solving tech problems and reviewing components and systems.

  • eklipz330
    it's pretty obvious what the natural evolution of this will be. dual infrared cameras that can pivot and have the distance between the two cameras either be increased or decreased. also cameras that will be able to telescope slightly should help with distance.
    Reply
  • basroil
    I would have called this "news" if it was done a few weeks ago... The F200 is ancient, and R200 was first announced way back when...
    Reply
  • bit_user
    17367291 said:
    it's pretty obvious what the natural evolution of this will be. dual infrared cameras that can pivot and have the distance between the two cameras either be increased or decreased. also cameras that will be able to telescope slightly should help with distance.
    I don't see that happening. They want to make it cheaper, yet any moving parts would add significant cost, bulk, and reduce reliability.

    Perhaps they'll add more cameras that aren't on the same baseline as the others. Or perhaps they'll use polarized filters.
    Reply