GeForce RTX 2070, 2080, or 2080 Ti: Which Nvidia Turing Card Is Right for You?

Contributor

Kevin Carbotte is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware who primarily covers VR and AR hardware. He has been writing for us for more than four years.

  • Integr8d
    Who cares? JUST BUY IT.
    Reply
  • Samuel White
    None at $800+ a card for less then 30% performance increase against my 1080 SSC2
    Reply
  • jaber2
    *80TI this or next version in about 5 years, my 1080Ti does all I want to do with current games
    Reply
  • quilciri
    I wonder how many torches & pitchforks of people who bought 20 series cards becaue of Tom's will be outside their offices when AMD's 7nm cards drop.
    Reply
  • compprob237
    Until GPU prices come down to even more reasonable prices I'll be sticking with my GTX 970. There's no cards yet to perform well enough to warrant a purchase at roughly the same price.
    Reply
  • beoza
    I have a GTX 970 as well, but I was looking at upgrading to a 1080 as the 970 is getting a bit old in the tech world. But if the 2070 is offering the same if not better performance than the 1080 I think I'll upgrade to the 2070. I play some games that are more CPU dependent like WoW (14yrs later they decide to work on optimizing for multi-core/multi-threaded), and others that utilize more of the GPU and can take advantage of more CPU cores. It's time for a GPU upgrade, I think my i7 6700K still has some life left in it.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    i tend to buy mid range or lower cards so none of them matter to me right now. looking to replace my 280 but am waiting to see what the 2050/60 models look like as they are closer to my preferred price range. though a current 1060 6gb looks good if the price is right :)

    don't care at all about eye candy in games so the new stuff is meaningless to me and not likely to be on the lower end 2000 series anyway from what i've read. not in a big hurry so if AMD is coming soon with their new stuff, i'll see what they have to offer as wel since i prefer to support them over nvidia to keep the competition alive.
    Reply
  • Posty351
    Seems like 1070 to 1080ti is still the way to go. The RTX's small bump in performance just don't justify the huge bump in price. I just went from a 970 to a 1080ti and could not be happier. It will last me a few years until 4k GPU's are affordable.
    Reply
  • Jim90
    "GeForce RTX 2070, 2080, or 2080 Ti: Which Nvidia Turing Card Is Right for You?"

    For the sane purchaser...none!
    Reply
  • Giroro
    The Ray-Tracing and AI hardware is a total waste of die space and money when it comes to gaming, even if its just $50. Most people will be better off putting that extra money towards RAM, SSD, their CPU, or even one of those little Optane modules. Literally half the hardware on the die generally won't be supported by devs for *years*, if ever. Just imagine how much better this generation would have been if that die space had been devoted to the actual GPU. Instead, the RTX line are just faulty quadro chips, so Nvidia is just doing the bare minimum amount of marketing to sell you on leftover features that are really only useful when companies like Disney and Google fill a warehouse with racks of Turing cards.

    If Nvidia is still supporting these features in a generation or two, then maybe it's worth looking into (although Nvidia RARELY supports throw-away leftover enterprise features like these past the pre-launch sales pitch). At this point, I don't have much confidence that Ray-Tracing and AI hardware will even be supported within the same generation in a RTX 2060/2050. They have to cut out about 3/4 of the die to get costs down enough to compete with AMD's current options in the mainstream market. But, if they made that cut and continued to include the wasted hardware, then those chips would only be able to eke out about 75% the performance of the last-gen equivalents.
    In the least, I think that it will at least be quite awhile before we see a RTX 2060 - because the reduced performance would force Nvidia to rebrand a would-be RTX 2060/2050 as an overpriced RTX 2030/2040.
    Maybe they'll even have to split the product lines and introduce a graphics-only GTX 2060 or skip directly to a chip that can be cut into a GTX 2180/2170/2160/2150.

    Bottom line, Nvidia has really marketed themselves into a corner trying to sucker people into all this this useless ray-tracing and AI crap. They're trying to justify a short-term (crypto influenced?) price-hike in a way that is ultimately going to do a lot of long-term harm to their branding.
    Reply