10 Times AMD Beat Intel in the CPU Innovation Race

Five Decades of CPU Rivalry

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • salgado18
    AMD has beaten Intel a lot of times. But evil tactics from Intel and one bad generation from AMD made the first rest on its laurels, and the later to go nearly bankrupt.

    But AMD has always been about inovation, like it or not.
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    The first Athlon at 1GHz was based on the K75 core not Thunderbird. It was a Slot A processor with 1/3 clock rate L2 cache.
    Reply
  • Onus
    I'm no Intel fanboy, but this article is really reaching. Highest clocks <> fastest processor, and Bulldozer was often called Faildozer for Reasons.
    Today, a suitable PC for most any task (not requiring Big Iron) can be built with a CPU from either company.
    Reply
  • bloodroses
    Being first doesn't necessarily mean being better as software needs to be there as well to take advantage of it. AMD takes risks to try and stay competitive, Intel stays with the standard. the 64-bit CPU is a perfect example as while AMD may have hit 64-bit first with x86, 64-bit Windows didn't become viable until Intel joined the game as well. Anyone who ran the 64-bit version of Windows XP on their new AMD chip knows this very well.

    Regardless, if it wasn't for AMD, innovation would stagnant as Intel wouldn't have actual competition in the x86 space.
    Reply
  • Martell1977
    I'm surprised there is no mention of the period when AMD was spanking Intel on IPC. In the time of 1.2ghz to 2.2ghz, AMD CPu's were killing Intel's P4. They had CPU's at 1.4ghz that were equivalent to Intel's 1.7 or 2.0ghz P4's.
    Reply
  • Gam3r01
    21099678 said:
    I'm no Intel fanboy, but this article is really reaching. Highest clocks <> fastest processor, and Bulldozer was often called Faildozer for Reasons.
    Today, a suitable PC for most any task (not requiring Big Iron) can be built with a CPU from either company.

    Im assuming we are supposed to read this article as a time based measure, not performance based. They beat them to that milestone, but failed to surpass intel with it. Which is not a great metric, but its something I guess.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    21099814 said:
    21099678 said:
    I'm no Intel fanboy, but this article is really reaching. Highest clocks <> fastest processor, and Bulldozer was often called Faildozer for Reasons.
    Today, a suitable PC for most any task (not requiring Big Iron) can be built with a CPU from either company.

    Im assuming we are supposed to read this article as a time based measure, not performance based. They beat them to that milestone, but failed to surpass intel with it. Which is not a great metric, but its something I guess.

    Than I would say how is that innovation? What good was a 5GHz FX-9590 that often couldn't stay at 5GHz without a decent CLC and even then failed to beat most stock clocked i5s?

    IMC, sure. Dual core, yes. But some of these are not what I would call innovation.
    Reply
  • feelinfroggy777
    Nice to finally see some competition again in the CPU space.
    Reply
  • almarcy
    Us geezers are amused by the state of the art... when I started, Univac still had in service computers using vacuum tubes. When the world went all SS, "Binning" of transistors was done by their switching speed. A given crop of theoretically similar pieces would require up to twenty bins. Ah, the good old days. Mainframes had vast back panels that sported huge coils of simple wire to get them all to work together, for a while. It was more fun, back when a system crash meant the user population could go home and call in daily to see if it was back up. I remember being at an IBM site that had crashed and stayed down over a week. Lots of three piece suits walking around, trying to look serious.
    Reply
  • gasaraki
    This article is reaching... Could have listed other things. Can't believe Bulldozer and FX is on here...
    Reply