Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Did you notice the missing Notebook Battery Life tests that we normally run on client SSDs? This brings us to a sour note when dealing with NVMe: compatibility. Even though our Lenovo X1 Carbon Gen 3 fully supports the AHCI-attached SM951, the NVMe model will not boot in the Broadwell-based platform. Lenovo may add support at a later date, but as of right now, the system kicks out an error telling us that it can't start up. Without boot support, we can't run our barrage of battery life tests on the SM951-NVMe.
And this points to an even larger problem. Several motherboard manufacturers released NVMe-enabled firmware updates for new X99 and Z97 platforms. But older boards haven't received the same love. Many users upgrading to cutting-edge storage products are building them into completely new configurations. There is an even larger group of enthusiasts with older Z87- and Z77-based machines, though. If your board vendor of choice isn't deliberately adding NVMe support, you won't be booting to an NVMe drive any time soon. We hope this will happen over time, but we aren't holding our breath that years-old motherboards will suddenly get new features.
If you already purchased a Samsung SM951 SSD with AHCI, then we can't recommend the NVMe model for its slight performance boost. It's faster, but only slightly. Moving from an 850 Pro to the SM951-NVMe is a nice upgrade though, and you will notice snappier performance from the reduced latency.
Compatibility obviously needs to be considered, but we also feel capacity should be included in your purchasing decision. The SM951s are limited to a maximum capacity of 512GB, while Samsung's 850 Pro scales to 1TB. That could be a problem for you if your Steam/Origin folder is bursting at the seams.
The 850 Pro 256GB is one of the fastest SATA-based products on the market today. Samsung's SM951-NVMe 256GB is the fastest client PCIe drive smaller than 400GB. We expect it to sell for just over $256 when it's released. That's much less than Intel's SSD 750 400GB NVMe SSD. If you want performance beyond what SATA offers but don't want to spend big money on unused capacity, the smaller SM951-NVMes are a good choice.
When they become available, we'll published performance results from the SM951-NVMe 128GB and 512GB models. We're excited to see how the SM951-NVMe 512GB compares to Intel's SSD 750 400GB.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
HP begins subscription plans for its printers and ink — up to $36 per month, includes limits and cancellation fees
Analyst estimates Nvidia is now TSMC's second largest customer accounting for 11% of revenue in 2023
Elon Musk sues OpenAI - alleging breaches of the founding agreement
Glad to see that some aspects of computing are getting rapid improvements.Reply
I will stick with 2.5" For Heat problems lolReply
hpv-2560 is rated 1.9A and the another one VPV-2560 is 2.7A Maybe you guys need test the power consumption.Reply
I find the preamble about comparing these M.2 drives to regular SATA drives a little odd. When SSD's first came out, of course they were compared to HDD's because that was precisely the question of the moment — how much more performance can one expect from the more expensive SSD's. With this new generation of SSD's, it's only natural to want to see them compared to the old, cheaper stuff. How else are we going to evaluate whether it's worth it to upgrade?Reply
If it only resulted in an extra 10% on a real-world test, then it wouldn't make any sense to spend double or more on a NVMe drive. With these solid numbers, though, the massive performance leap will be well worth the cost for those who can afford it.
Looks great! NVMe is defiantly the ideal solution for users that need high speed/responsive storage.Reply
I wish you guys would of compared this NVMe SSD to the Intel NVMe SSD that just came out.
The Intel SSD 750 and the Samsung SM951-NVMe will show up side by side soon in another review.Reply
What about the rest of the system in which they were tested?Reply
Test systems: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/how-we-test-storage,4058.htmlReply
All three drives were tested in the PCIe test system. They are the only systems setup for testing queue depths beyond 32.
I'm sad the real world chart is misleading. If you show seconds instead of MB/s you'd see it doesn't justify the cost. Sad.Reply
The Intel SSD 750 and the Samsung SM951-NVMe will show up side by side soon in another review.That is a natural comparison and I look forward to reading it.