All about Motherboards
 Latest Motherboards articles
All Motherboards articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
crazy : Interactive Boogy Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
Ads

Sponsored links

790GX: Dissected

Previous Next
3:40 AM - 08/06/2008 by Chris Angelini

The 790GX consists of two components (versus Nvidia’s single-chip platforms): the 790GX northbridge and an SB750 southbridge.

790GX: A Little of This, A Little of That

From the top-down, chipset diagram view, there’s actually very little distinguishing the 790GX northbridge from the 780G that came before it. Both components support HyperTransport 3 connectivity to AMD’s latest processors (790GX runs at up to 2.6 GHz). They both incorporate dual, independent display controllers — one digital and one analog. Support for DVI, HDMI, and DisplayPort are shared between the pair. And the two include onboard graphics based on AMD’s RV610 core.

However, one noticeable difference is PCI Express connectivity. Both chipsets boast a x16 PCIe 2.0 link for graphics. But while the 780G takes a single add-in card, 790GX is able to branch off into a pair of x8 links, offering the same 8 GB/s per slot you’d get from a first-gen x16 connection.

The flexible PCIe configuration lets 790GX boast CrossFireX support for higher-end gaming, similar to what Nvidia did with 780a SLI, which begs the questions, “How many enthusiasts need integrated graphics on their gaming machine” and “How many mainstream gamers need a pair of x16 slots for dual-card setups?” Aren’t the 790FX and 780G chipsets already doing a great job keeping those respective segments satisfied?

Fortunately, 790GX offers more than just a divisible PCIe link. The integrated RV610 core, armed with 40 stream processors, the same UVD support, and a 16-bit memory interface gets accelerated from 500 MHz on 780G to 700 MHz on 790GX — exciting since the northbridge is manufactured using the same 55 nm process used to etch 780G. Then again, AMD always did seem confident in the core’s available headroom. As a result of its higher clock, the graphics solution is now being called Radeon HD 3300-class.

Moreover, the side-port memory feature made available to board vendors before (but was rarely used) looks like it’s turning into a standard feature. As a refresher, side-port memory is a DDR2/DDR3 cache that lives on the motherboard, directly connected to the graphics core. Without the memory, the RV610 core utilizes the HyperTransport interface to access DDR2 memory attached to the processor’s integrated controller. But by adding even just 128 MB of DDR3 running at 1,333 MHz, AMD claims performance jumps by as much as 15 percent. We’ll be putting those claims to the test in a performance suite brand new to Tom’s Hardware.

Northbridge
AMD 790GX AMD 780G Nvidia GeForce 8300
Processor Interface HT 3.0/5,200 MT/s HT 3.0/5,200 MT/s HT 3.0/5,200 MT/s
PCI Express Support 2.0/26 lanes/2x8 Graphics 2.0/26 lanes/1x16 Graphics 2.0/19 lanes/1x16 Graphics
Integrated Core RV610 RV610 G86
DirectX/OpenGL 10.1/2.1 10.1/2.1 10.0/2.0
Graphics Clock 700 MHz 500 MHz 500 MHz
Display Outputs DisplayPort, HDMI, DVI, VGA DisplayPort, HDMI, DVI, VGA HDMI, DVI, VGA
Multi-GPU Hybrid CrossFireX, CrossFireX Hybrid CrossFireX GeForce Boost
Addtl. PCIe Six x1 PCIe 2.0 Six x1 PCIe 2.0 Three x1 PCIe 2.0
Southbridge SB750 SB700 N/A
Interconnect A-Link Xpress (4 x PCIe 1.1) A-Link Xpress (4 x PCIe 1.1) N/A
RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 10, 5 RAID 0, 1, 10 RAID 0, 1, 10, 5
Audio HD Audio HD Audio HD Audio
USB 12 USB 2.0 + 2 USB 1.1 12 USB 2.0 + 2 USB 1.1 12 USB 2.0
Ethernet N/A N/A Gigabit Ethernet

Beyond the core’s 3D capabilities, 790GX retains the same video capabilities introduced with 780G. Mainly, it boasts the first-gen Avivo HD display pipeline, including AMD’s Universal Video Decoder. Even if you don’t install a discrete card, the integrated core’s UVD handles Blu-ray playback with ease. To that end, HDCP support is of course an important part of the package and, like AMD’s add-in boards, the Radeon HD 3300’s HDMI output does S/PDIF audio as well. It simply lacks some of the functionality introduced with the RV770 core: acceleration of dual video streams, dynamic contrast, and 7.1-channel audio over HDMI.

As with 780G, 790GX offers two independent display controllers; one analog (VGA) and the other digital (dual-link DVI, HDMI, or DisplayPort). In all frankness, we would have liked to see two digital outputs this time around. After all, if a gamer is flush enough to afford two cards in CrossFire, he probably has a couple of LCDs, too. Given the scarcity of DisplayPort-equipped displays, expect most 790GX boards to include VGA, DVI, and HDMI outputs, just like we saw with 780G.

Talkback
kitsilencer 08/06/2008 6:47 AM
Hide
-6+

Great review, and it's good to see that AMD is at last able to target more enthusiast markets competitively.

cangelini 08/06/2008 7:38 AM
Hide
-0+

kitsilencer :
Great review, and it's good to see that AMD is at last able to target more enthusiast markets competitively.



Thanks for the feedback Kit.

eklipz330 08/06/2008 8:19 AM
Hide
-1+

^^^iseriously thought that was sarcasm, until i saw the authors name

waffle911 08/06/2008 9:01 AM
Hide
-0+

So... why does a page 15 and 16 of this article exist if there is no page 15 or 16 to the article?
Take a closer look. What happened?

YYD 08/06/2008 9:15 AM
Hide
-2+

PCMark seems Intel biased, please read this:
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/har [...] view.ars/6

Please change this benchmark suite or check if PcMark Vantage is unbiased.

cangelini 08/06/2008 9:23 AM
Hide
-0+

waffle911 :
So... why does a page 15 and 16 of this article exist if there is no page 15 or 16 to the article?Take a closer look. What happened?



That was strange. Should be fixed now.

cangelini 08/06/2008 9:24 AM
Hide
-0+

YYD :
PCMark seems Intel biased, please read this:http://arstechnica.com/reviews/har [...] view.ars/6Please change this benchmark suite or check if PcMark Vantage is unbiased.



Fortunately, with no Intel platforms tested, this should be a non-issue for the current situation ;-) In the future, you'll be seeing SYSmark, though.

Anonymous 08/06/2008 9:30 AM
Hide
-1+

Seems past page 8 or something the links are corrupt.. can't fully read this article and getting error 404 - page not found.

Anonymous 08/06/2008 9:32 AM
Hide
-1+

.. and now the article seems to be removed even from the main page!?!?!

cangelini 08/06/2008 9:51 AM
Hide
-0+

lacrits :
.. and now the article seems to be removed even from the main page!?!?!



Alright, mystery solved. It's back up, sans the blank page. Thanks for pointing that out lacrits!

nickchalk 08/06/2008 11:31 AM
Hide
-2+

Hi, i wanted to ask something aout the article.
why you use 3470 and 8500 for the tests?
hybrid crossfire and nvidia boost don't work with faster cards?
is the performance gain not big with 3870 or 9600gt?
thanks

cangelini 08/06/2008 11:36 AM
Hide
-2+

Hybrid CrossFireX uses alternate frame rendering, as does GeForce Boost, I believe. As a result, both technologies are best complemented by discrete boards evenly matched to the integrated core. In the case of the GeForce 8300, that'd be an 8500 GT. For the 790GX, AMD recommends the 3470. To spend any more money on discrete graphics for either platform would be a waste of money even if you could use faster cards.

nickchalk 08/06/2008 11:42 AM
Hide
-1+

thanks for responding so fast.
so what if i use a 3650 with this board? or why will i buy a quad core and dont spend some more for a 3850?

cangelini 08/06/2008 11:54 AM
Hide
-0+

Unfortunately, performance won't scale with the 3650. With that said, you'll still see reasonable gaming performance in Hybrid CrossFireX. The beauty of this board is that you CAN drop in a 3850, 3870, 4850, etc. and then add a second one later for CrossFireX.

demonhorde665 08/06/2008 12:47 PM
Hide
-0+

as cool as new main board features are , I think eventually consumer graphics wil move to a poitn where seperate card buses jsut dont cut it, I see a future where a main board has 2 sockets on board one for teh CPU and one for the GPU , at that time i also expect that the main board with have two sets of ram slots as well one set of slots for system ram and one set of slots for video ram. think of teh possiblities such a future could have , instead of replacing an entire component card , you just drop in a new gpu and or add more video ram much as you would upgrade the cpu/system ram. of course in this furture FSB speeds would ahve to reach ridculous proportions , i think this is the only reason that this kind of video ard setup hasnt already happened

zenmaster 08/06/2008 1:20 PM
Hide
-0+

cangelini :
Unfortunately, performance won't scale with the 3650. With that said, you'll still see reasonable gaming performance in Hybrid CrossFireX. The beauty of this board is that you CAN drop in a 3850, 3870, 4850, etc. and then add a second one later for CrossFireX.



Nice Review, However I would like to see how well SLI scales on this board using a 4850 and 4870 vs another AMD Board with full Duel 16x PCIE 2.0 Slots.

I've seen some other reviews where Dual 8x PCIE 2.0 Slots start having scaling issues on the 4850 at are not seen on the 3800 Series.

computerfarmer 08/06/2008 1:20 PM
Hide
-1+

Thank you for this excellent article.
Does the 128mb side-port limit the on board video to that amount of memory? Does this affect Vista Areo?

jimmysmitty 08/06/2008 3:13 PM
Hide
-1+

Good article. Phenom can finally OC. I wounder if the mobo makers are going to make them with higher quality voltage regulators so it can support the 9850BE and higher across the selection.

cshorte 08/06/2008 3:47 PM
Hide
-1+

good review,

i have a question why do you recommend ddr1066 over 800? i thought there wasn't a huge difference.

also im a bit confused about this 16x, vs. 8x 8x...
if i use a single card (for now) which motherboard (790g, 790gx) will produce more graphixs capabilities?

ltcommander_data 08/06/2008 4:03 PM
Hide
-1+

It would have been interesting to see a comparison between the GMA X4500 and the 790GX.

http://www.hkepc.com/?id=1510&page=5&fs=idn#view

The GMA X4500 seems to be much faster than the GMA X3500 and within 10-30% of the 780G in actual games. I guess the 790GX was a timely addition and with it being 20% faster than the 780G, that should open up the lead over the GMA X4500 to 30-50%.


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links