- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (74) |
- Share
Best AGP Card for Under $100:
| Codename: | RV635 |
| Process: | 55nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 128 |
| Texture Units: | 8 |
| ROPs: | 4 |
| Memory Bus: | 128-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 725 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 500 (1000 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10 / SM 4.0 |
With the 2600 Pro AGP getting harder to find at a good price, the near-identical 3650 has come along to take its place. At $80, it’s not a bad upgrade for any number of older AGP cards.
Best AGP Card for $100:
| Codename: | RV630 |
| Process: | 65nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 128 |
| Texture Units: | 8 |
| ROPs: | 4 |
| Memory Bus: | 128-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 800 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 700 (1400 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10 / SM 4.0 |
The 2600 XT holds its position at $100. This is a decently fast DirectX 10 card available for AGP, and it surprisingly offers a great deal of performance at the $100 price point. Previously reported driver issues seem to have been worked out, and the only thing detracting from the 2600 XT is the dropping price of the 3850 AGP.
Best AGP Card For $130
| Codename: | RV670 |
| Process: | 55nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 320 |
| Texture Units: | 16 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 670 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 833 (1666 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
Forever rumored and now finally available to purchase, the Radeon 3850 is, frankly, a curiously powerful card for the aging AGP bus. It’s a bit too powerful, in fact, to be properly utilized on the single-core CPUs that are typically paired with this platform.
Regardless, this is the most powerful AGP card you can get. Perhaps you have an AGP gaming system you just can’t bear to part with, or an older system with both a dual-core CPU and AGP slot. Whatever the reason, you can’t get better than an AGP 3850, and if anyone ever releases a more powerful card in the future for the dying bus, we’ll be incredibly surprised.
- Best PCI graphics Card [Graphic & Displays]
- Best Graphics Card For 1366x768 [Graphic & Displays]
- The best graphics card for my system [Graphic & Displays]
- Best graphic card for laptop [Graphic & Displays]
- What is the best Graphics card my PSU will power? [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 4
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Fastest Single Core CPU?
- AMD 939 upgrade options (warhammer!)
- Unexplainable high prices !!!
- Best configuration for 3d animation
- Upgrading? CPU, GFX or RAM?
- HOWTO: Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - Guide v1.6.1
- Phenom and Ati Card
- Questions about Q6600 & 9600GT.
- GUIDE: 3+GHz Core 2 Duo Budget System for $426 (Overclock)
- Watercooling Core i7 in Antec 1200 questions
- MEMORY FAQ (please read before posting)
- Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H dead? or maybe not...
- [LGA 1366] Best Motherboard, $ unlimited ???
- Motherboards confusion
Best offers
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $129.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $214.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Radeon HD 5770 Video Card (1GB,... | $179.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
896-P3-1255-AR GeForce GTX260 Video... | $223.26 PC Connection More info |
|
Radeon HD 5750 Video Card (1GB,... | $144.99 Newegg.com More info |
- radeon 3850 hd driver
- radeon 3850 agp review
- hd 3850 agp review
- best graphics card for under 100
- radeon hd 3850 agp drivers
- radeon 3850 agp drivers
- most powerful agp graphics card
- driver for radeon hd 3850 agp
- radeon hd 3850 agp review
- agp directx 10
- radeon 3850 agp driver
- best graphic card under 100
- best gaming graphics cards for the money agp interface
- best gaming graphics card for under 100
- radeon 3850 agp best drivers
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|
Good write up. Thanks for the chart, helps to pick between ATI and nVidia on price points
BTW, first 4850x2 card on Newegg: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 9&Tpk=4850
the 4850x2 belongs in the spot between the 4870 and 4870x2 ? lol
Not quite sure on that though. At $430, the price is a little high for it though as a crossfire of 2x 4850s would only run about $320. I would rather invest that extra $100 in a better motherboard.
"It doesn’t need an external power cable, which for some upgraders is a really important feature."
Actually I was wondering how important that really is. My best friend lives a long way from me, so to avoid having to carry heavy computers with serveral terabytes of harddrives etc I built a lightweight pc with a brisbane, a zalman 9700, 3 raptors and a dvdrw drive in a lanfire (3kg) chassis. It's power by a puny xilenz (or spelled another way) 450W psu. When my friend visits he just plugs in his 8800gtx and plays. We power it via two converters from molex to the 6pin plugs - and it runs just fine when I got to his place and use my hd4870 in it - so I'm actually wondering if it's that big a deal if the psu is adequate or not. For longterm use it may be, but in the 4 months I've had the system, we haven't see any problems with it. So even without pcie power on the psu you can get a decent lan gamer it would appear.
This "big bang 2" driver was total rubbish, only thing it did was cause my first BSOD for this year in Vistax64.
Noticed no improvement during the three minutes I played on it prior to bsod either..
"It doesn’t need an external power cable, which for some upgraders is a really important feature."Actually I was wondering how important that really is. My best friend lives a long way from me, so to avoid having to carry heavy computers with serveral terabytes of harddrives etc I built a lightweight pc with a brisbane, a zalman 9700, 3 raptors and a dvdrw drive in a lanfire (3kg) chassis. It's power by a puny xilenz (or spelled another way) 450W psu. When my friend visits he just plugs in his 8800gtx and plays. We power it via two converters from molex to the 6pin plugs - and it runs just fine when I got to his place and use my hd4870 in it - so I'm actually wondering if it's that big a deal if the psu is adequate or not. For longterm use it may be, but in the 4 months I've had the system, we haven't see any problems with it. So even without pcie power on the psu you can get a decent lan gamer it would appear.
Using less power means saving $$$ in the form of lower electric bills. Also, that card would be great for any individual looking to build a machine with low power consumption without sacrificing too much performance(on-board chipsets are horrid for gaming).
This "big bang 2" driver was total rubbish, only thing it did was cause my first BSOD for this year in Vistax64.Noticed no improvement during the three minutes I played on it prior to bsod either..
Then be glad you ain't got an ati card! while my vista64 doesn't generate bsod, it does frequently crash the display driver (and successfully recover it) when I'm running media player classic on the secondary monitor while playing world of warcraft on the primary one in window mode. (both with 8.9 and 8.10)
@Slomo4sho : Ye sure it's useful for that, but that's not what I was talking about. The article does seem to assume the card will be used for gaming, and most gaming systems are not built to be cost effective on the power bill ; or at least I don't know of anyone who cared for efficiency when building a gaming pc. My point was, that it doesn't seem to matter if the psu has pcie connectivity or not in order to use a card requiring it.
"The Radeon 4350 joins the list not because it’s a great gaming card, but because it can be found for only $40"
The article indicates that they are aware the 4350 is not the top contender for a gaming PC. But anyone with a budget system and a 17" inch screen would find it worthwhile over on-board graphics. I am actually thinking about using the 4350 in a build for my parents
Now at $100, the Radeon HD 3870 is an easy recommendation, lying between the GeForce 8800 GT and the new Radeon HD 4670. It is still a force to be reckoned with at 1600x1200, and even at 1920x1200.
isn't 4670 the wrong number you meant? because who want to pay $100 for a card that performs like a $dollar gpu?
like always a good article
"The Radeon 4350 joins the list not because it’s a great gaming card, but because it can be found for only $40"The article indicates that they are aware the 4350 is not the top contender for a gaming PC. But anyone with a budget system and a 17" inch screen would find it worthwhile over on-board graphics. I am actually thinking about using the 4350 in a build for my parents
Hey kid don't take it out of context! the card you're quoting isn't the one they point out the feature of no extra pcie on. That card is infact futher down the page, and being passed on as a decent cheap gaming card - which it probably is.
Hey kid don't take it out of context! the card you're quoting isn't the one they point out the feature of no extra pcie on. That card is infact futher down the page, and being passed on as a decent cheap gaming card - which it probably is.
First off, there is no need for name calling as I am probably older than you are. Secondly, the quote is not out of context. The quote is the introduction to the write-up on the
On page 3 :
Even though the Radeon HD 4830 offers the 8800/8900 GT its first competition in its price class, the card remains a strong contender, and is still a viable option.
8900GT?
First off, there is no need for name calling as I am probably older than you are. Secondly, the quote is not out of context. The quote is the introduction to the write-up on the
grr seems half of my post got cut off somehow...
As I was saying, the quote is the introduction to the write-up
Hmm 260+ but not 4870 1GB? The Asus card can be had for $270. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814121277
sapphire made a custom Radeon HD 4850 X2 2gb.
grr seems half of my post got cut off somehow...As I was saying, the quote is the introduction to the write-up
Fine that is what you interpret it as, but I do not.
In the intro it sais it's for gamers, not for home cinema systems.
And as for kid, fine you may not be one, but you're still either taking it out of context, or not understanding it even remotely the way I think it's meant.
or not understanding it even remotely the way I think it's meant.
Either your perception is right or I am wrong. Either way, the 4350 and 4670 are both low power consumption cards and both can be considered for gaming on budget systems on which a individual plans on playing low resolution.
Never said they couldn't did I ?
Besides, if I am right, you are wrong - it's not possible the way you describe it. I'm right or you're right, but if you're wrong I can't be.
Read what I quoted in bold and underlined. What you perceive to be true may not be true for another individual. Each individual has their own interpretation of reality.
Either way, its almost 5 AM, I am going to bed