Best offers
|
GeForce GTX 295 Video Card (1.75GB,... | $549.99 Dell Home More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $214.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $219.85 PC Connection More info |
|
Radeon HD 5770 Video Card (1GB,... | $179.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Radeon HD 4890 Cyclone OC Video Card... | $216.70 PC Connection More info |
Popular Searches
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
violent :
More Mindless Violence
Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
|
Ads
Sponsored links
9:10 AM - 04/07/2008 by
Don Woligroski
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (9) |
- Share
| GeForce 9600 GT 512 MB | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | G92 |
| Process: | 65nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 64 |
| Texture Units: | 32 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 650 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 900 (1800 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10 / SM 4.0 |
(Compare Prices on Geforce 9600 GT 512 MB Cards)
The new 9600 GT is Nvidia’s answer to the Radeon 3800 series: cheap, powerful and efficient, the 9600 GT usually performs a bit below the 3870 with no antialiasing, and a bit faster than the 3870 when AA is enabled. Since the 9600 GT has lowered in price to $150, there is little reason to pay more for the 3870.
Best PCI-E Card For $200
| GeForce 8800 GT 512 MB | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | G92 |
| Process: | 65nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 112 |
| Texture Units: | 56 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 600 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 900 (1800 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10 / SM 4.0 |
The 8800 GT offers incredible GeForce 8800 GTX-class performance at almost half the price. It beats both the Radeon 3870 and GeForce 9600 GT by a notable margin, but it does tend to be a bit more expensive. That said, if you have $200 to spend on a graphics card, you couldn’t do better than a nice 8800 GT.
Topics being discussed on the forums
- Workstation Vs. Gaming Graphics Cards [Graphic & Displays]
- October Gaming graphics cards [Graphic & Displays]
- Graphics cards. Not for gaming, for multi media, design etc. [Graphic & Displays]
- The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: April 2008 [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- AMD Phenom II 940 "Xtremely" Benchmarked
- Would it be bad (amd)
- Q6600 or i7 920?
- It looks as if AMD did a price cut as well
- E8500 vs X2 7750
- Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide
- Guide to Overclocking Video Cards (56K WARNING)
- New Build, want to OC - need advice!
- A short story of water cooling Now with Triple cooled GTX's.Pictures
- Core Clock, Memory Clock confusion - advice please.
- New i7 workstation
- I want to upgrade to 4gb ram
- need help, memory test or system test
- Nvidia chipset vs. Intel ?
I would personally like to see the higher end video card rankings include not just SLI options. First, if you are upgrading an existing single card system an SLI option is not an option. Second, if you are building new or dont have an SLI MB then that best for $300 option is more like best for $400 because in most cases you will pay $100 more to just set up SLI. It requires a bigger PSU than a single card system would need and most newer SLI MBs, like the 780i series, are more expensive than the single card alternative, like a P35. IMO going to SLI is not the best option for many people. Nothing wrong with including it in the review for those with a SLI capable MB but it should not replace what is the best card in that price range.
^Agreed,
I can't SLI on my Mobo and don't plan to get a SLI mobo any time soon. IMO single card solutions are always better as some games don't support SLI and sometimes the improvement over the single card is only a few FPS.
Also agreed, I don't plan on spending what extra cash I do have on a second video card.
Your final table is really messed up. you have ATI and Nvida cards mixed up. Also you are missing relatively new cards like the 8800 GTS 320 which is a great buy used right now as people upgrade.
Also, in reference to my earlier post, could you treat SLI like you do AGP with a seperate list? Recomending SLI to people who dont already have an SLI MB is not helpful at all.
I'd also like to see single slot suggestions for the high end... and a comparison on how they stack up the SLI.
A submission for the under $100 card: Powercolor AX3650 1gb ddr2 128 bit $64.99 after $20 rebate. Only $130 for 2 gb in crossfire.
This chart is for gaming cards. I would like to see same charts but then for video-editing users, dtp-users, allround-users.
Hrmmmm.... SLI and Vista still not working correctly? Ive heard from all my gamer buddies this is true, and I just switched (I love vista, i hated till i tried it). Anyways Im on a 512 Geforce 8800GT loving graphics and was thinking about buying another 8800GT for the SLI...but apparently SLI doesnt work with Vista (something about Nvidia drivers and Vista)... Is this true or is that Mac antivista propaganda?
that's old news nows , before the amazing HD 4000 series come out .
i have HD 4650 (bought it for 72$ now in newwegg cost 40$ )
and it's beat GF9500GT in everything .