Best Gaming Graphics Cards for the Money: AGP Interface

Previous Next
1:20 AM - 06/02/2008 by Don Woligroski

Best AGP Card for Under $100:

Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Codename: RV630
Process: 65 nm
Universal Shaders: 128
Texture Units: 8
ROPs: 4
Memory Bus: 128 bit
Core Speed MHz: 600
Memory Speed MHz: 500 (1000 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 10 / SM 4.0

In this category we’re now recommending the low-priced Radeon 2600 PRO. This card is almost as fast as the older Geforce 7600, but can now be found for less than $100 on the aging AGP bus; at that price, it’s a good buy.

Best AGP Card for $100:

Radeon HD 2600 XT
Codename: RV630
Process: 65 nm
Universal Shaders: 128
Texture Units: 8
ROPs: 4
Memory Bus: 128 bit
Core Speed MHz: 800
Memory Speed MHz: 700 (1400 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 10 / SM 4.0

The 2600 XT is relatively new to the AGP scene, but almost as cheap as its PCIe cousin. This is a decently fast DirectX 10 card for the AGP bus, and surprisingly offers a great deal of performance at the $100 price point. Be forewarned that it’s been reported the official ATI drivers don’t work with the AGP version of this card, but the modified Omega drivers work fine.

Best AGP Card For $110 to $160: None

With stock of the AGP X1950 PRO and 7900 GS almost impossible to find, there are no longer any compelling AGP cards to purchase in this price segment; this is perhaps the beginning of the end of AGP support.

Best AGP Card For $170:

Radeon 3850 512MB
Codename: RV670
Process: 55 nm
Universal Shaders: 320
Texture Units: 16
ROPs: 16
Memory Bus: 256 bit
Core Speed MHz: 670
Memory Speed MHz: 833 (1666 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 10.1 / SM 4.0

Forever rumored and now finally available to purchase, the Radeon 3850 is, frankly, a curiously powerful card for the aging AGP bus. In fact, it’s possibly too powerful to be properly utilized on the single-core CPUs that are typically found on this platform.

Regardless, this is the most powerful AGP card you can get. Maybe you have an AGP gaming system you just can’t bear to part with, or perhaps you have an older system with both a dual-core CPU and AGP slot: whatever the reason, you can’t get better than an AGP 3850. If in the future anyone ever releases a more powerful card for the dying bus, we’ll be incredibly surprised.

Talkback
reasonablevoice 06/02/2008 9:46 AM
Hide
-4+

Will somebody finally fix the wording on the 9600 GSO description?! It states, "the 9600 GSO is what was formerly known as the 8800 GS, and the 8800 GS is essentially a crippled 8600 GT"
That should say it is essentially a crippled 8800 GT
Thanks

reasonablevoice 06/02/2008 10:00 AM
Hide
-3+

Something else that bothers me is seeing all these spots being taken up by SLI and Crossfire configurations. I suppose it makes sense to include them but I for one never want to have to run more than one graphics card in my system. I still go for performance, my main machine has an 8800 GTS 512 in it, but it seems like this is more of a play for gamer's cash than trying to make games more playable. Cost is just one issue for me though. The extra power requirements, heat dissipation, and when you start talking about 3 or 4 cards space in your case becomes an issue. I have several expansion cards in my system besides my double slot cooled graphics card.
Energy is of especial concern to me, while my system isn't exactly a "green" machine, I did take keep in mind power efficiency and savings while selecting the parts for my build. Anyway, aside from multiple gpus on one PCB, I will never run SLI or Crossfire.

shmuls 06/02/2008 11:37 AM
Hide
-0+

I second reasonablevoice's comment!! Don, what if I have $210+ to spend on a GPU and only one PCIE slot?!? More people have a MoBo with a single PCIE slot than have AGP, but you always mention AGP!! To use SLI they have to buy a new motherboard with an Nvidia chipset (not intel!), and probably a new power supply or case as well, costing much more time and money. Don, start listening to the people...

brownlove 06/02/2008 1:34 PM
Hide
-1+

I do appreciate artcles like this. However, they don't seem to take in others qualities of the technology. If an Nvidia card scores 15 to 20 FPS better in a video game than an ATI based card, but has poorer quality when it comes to watching tv, video, and other media functions, I'd want to know about that. I'd rather have the whole package in a video card.

JeanLuc 06/02/2008 1:35 PM
Hide
-0+

donstinks :
Don, your Best Graphics Cards for the Money just get worse every time. Do you research these cards for the price ranges? such as performance/power requirements or common problems? or just spend 5 or less minutes slapping this all together? or do you just reach further up your arse every time?? no recommendations for non-sli over 210? from a power/performance standpoint, there must be at least 1 card better than sli at the equiv. price.



Why do you have to be so rude?

Despite how he puts his POV across he is right. You should consider those who don't have access to SLI or Crossfire technologies in future articles.

BTW, when are the charts going to be updated?

r352alit 06/02/2008 1:40 PM
Hide
-0+

Yeah, thats right!!! I agree with you donstinks, too much SLI or Crossfire, that is really such a pain in the arse. I mean c'mon think about power consume, heat issue, and money. i don't think that anyone can buy or change a system just for 1 month or less, after they read and ask here and there about plus and minus from their current system specially GPU. It did powerfull card means expensive one, but don't forget about the price and power consumption. Not too many people that can afford a $210 card, so... why don't you start to 'research' about cheap card, low power consume and can play the latest game. And don't too focus to high-end multi billionaire hardware maniac enthusiast though.

spaztic7 06/02/2008 2:03 PM
Hide
-0+

What card for the money will be able to display at 1920x1200 or higher in Crysis, Oblivion, or any high end game? My 8800GTX is struggling at this resolution and I am looking to go up to 2560x1600 soon. What is the best card for that for $300-$400???

These best for the money is good... but it could be so much more!

WiredEvolution 06/02/2008 3:02 PM
Hide
-0+

reasonablevoice :
Something else that bothers me is seeing all these spots being taken up by SLI and Crossfire configurations. ... Energy is of especial concern to me, while my system isn't exactly a "green" machine, I did take keep in mind power efficiency and savings ... /citation]

This was apparent on May's round up too. No consideration for extra "cost" involved with added heat disipation or power consumption. This *IS* an article looking at costs, and these 2 variables should factor in to any purchasing benchmark.

[citation][nom]shmuls[/nom]I second reasonablevoice's comment!! ... To use SLI they have to buy a new motherboard with an Nvidia chipset (not intel!), and probably a new power supply ... Don, start listening to the people...



Good point, although I think mobo choices are a little subjective to include in this benchmark as it's benchmark is cost/performance of video cards. Good call though about AGP being mentioned, while THG seems aloof to the inherited heat and power issues associated with SLI.

Anonymous 06/02/2008 3:26 PM
Hide
-0+

Hmmm... well i think a card is missing from the $300 - $400 Range. The
HD3870x2, benchmarks have shown it outperforming 2 hd3870s in crossfire.
Plus Dual GPUs are sexy

rosanjin 06/02/2008 3:26 PM
Hide
-1+

I for one would like to thank Don for his continuing work on this article. I believe it's up to us, as readers, to filter out what hardware configurations are unworkable in our current rigs from issues like chipset/hardware/thermal limitations. The point of what he's doing here is to give a simple, relative recommendation scale for gamers who may have been out of the loop for a bit. (I'm sure most of us know how quickly this market can turn if you're not paying constant attention) :D

mpkonig 06/02/2008 3:29 PM
Hide
-3+

Too many Sli Configs. If you really like putting the Sli configs in, then make another section for that. I personally want to know about single card solutions.

blackened144 06/02/2008 3:38 PM
Hide
-0+

brownlove, as someone who went from the 6800GT to the x1650 to the 8800GT, I have not noticed any difference image quality watching DVD, BluRay, HD DVD or live TV broadcasts on my ATI theater 600 Pro going from the x1650 to the 8800GT. The only difference I ever noticed was when I was using a 30" CRT HD Sony Wega TV as my monitor, the the ATI did compensate for overscan better than the Nvidia card, but the actual image quality was close enough that I did not notice a difference going to the 8800GT from the x1650 Pro. I did see a pretty big improvement when I went to the x1650 Pro from the 6800GT.

Cleeve 06/02/2008 4:20 PM
Hide
-0+

Hey guys,

I've dsaid it before and I'll say it again: what I'm recommending is the best price/performance setups, not the best for your particular mobo.

You have a single PCIe slot? Then buy the single PCIe card like the 8800 GTS 512MB. I'm not going to recommend something with poor price/performance like the 9800 GTX because you don't have two PCIe slots. That doesn't make sense.

Anonymous 06/02/2008 4:46 PM
Hide
-0+

lol, you are talking about price/performance ratio? did you count the cost premium you gonna spend on a sli/Crossfire ready motherboard than a standard single PCIe slot motherboard? then there goes power consumption and oh don't forgot to mention a sli/crossfire ready psu is usually cost $30-50 more than a

Cleeve 06/02/2008 4:50 PM
Hide
-0+

That still doesn't make the 9800 GTX or 9800 GX2 a good deal, mate. They are overpriced.

There are recommended single card solutions, the best of which is the 8800 GTS 512MB. IMHO if you have a single slot and you're spending more than that, you're wasting your money.

Compared to the 8800 GTS 512MB, the price difference is huge and the performance increase is minimal with the GTX.

The GX2 hasd more oomph, but dude... it's $500 for chrissake. Two 9600 GTs are $300, it still makes more sense to get an SLI mobo.

So yeah, I did count the cost premium...

Cleeve 06/02/2008 5:24 PM
Hide
-0+

I will cede the 3870 X2 might not be a terrible choice though.

I might add it next month if the price is close enough to two 3870s/9600 GTs.

johnbilicki 06/02/2008 5:27 PM
Hide
-1+

You guys need to stop with the copy and paste and actually review things before you publish them. The 9600 GSO is essentially a crippled 8800GT. You can cripple a 128-bit memory interface card unless you lower the bus width. I'm glad at least one other person posted about this.

Cleeve 06/02/2008 5:46 PM
Hide
-1+

Wow. We're fixing it, but seriously... It's a typo fella.
Learn to cope.

LkS 06/02/2008 6:13 PM
Hide
--1+

cleeve :
Wow. We're fixing it, but seriously... It's a typo fella.Learn to cope.



This problem isn't just with this article it is in many posts on the site. Please proof read. This article was very lazy job. It was confusing to read. I will probably stop visiting Toms if this level of poor presentation continues.

Cleeve 06/02/2008 6:19 PM
Hide
-1+

The article was proofread a number of times, lad. But nobody's perfect.

For what it's worth, your threat gave me a chuckle though. :)


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links

All about Graphics Cards
 Latest Graphics Cards articles
All Graphics Cards articles
 Graphics Cards performance charts
All performance charts
 Latest Graphics Cards news
All Graphics Cards news

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

Ads

Sponsored links